lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
May 7, 2014 5:38pm
What, partying and having fun? LOL I'd take the word of the coaches who have worked with him (Sumlin and Whitfield) and attest to his work ethic and attitude than anyone else.queencitybuckeye;1613640 wrote:massive character issues.
Above all, dude wants to kick ass in the NFL, he doesn't have character issues imo.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
May 7, 2014 5:38pm
I lol'd at you throwing your roommate under the bus.Automatik;1613642 wrote:My roommate thinks the same thing, although the only thing he knows about Manziel is what has been pumped out by ESPN. Coincidence?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 7, 2014 6:30pm
It's as if the Bull and the Fox have been reading my postings! Today they were whackin it at the thought of drafting both Manzial and Sammy.
The simplest way of doing it would be to package 26 and 35 for Houston's pick. If needed, give them one of the number 4's as well. The late minute frenzy to draft Manziel includes both the Raiders and Tampa Bay trading up for St Louie's number 2, with packages comparable to what Washington did to land RG 3. How to stop it? Get Houston's number1.
Imagine 6 or 7 pro bowlers on one offensive unit. It's up to you Farmer....you either get it done or you don't.
The simplest way of doing it would be to package 26 and 35 for Houston's pick. If needed, give them one of the number 4's as well. The late minute frenzy to draft Manziel includes both the Raiders and Tampa Bay trading up for St Louie's number 2, with packages comparable to what Washington did to land RG 3. How to stop it? Get Houston's number1.
Imagine 6 or 7 pro bowlers on one offensive unit. It's up to you Farmer....you either get it done or you don't.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
May 7, 2014 6:39pm
It's true though. He doesn't follow college football and the only thing he knows about Manziel are the ridiculous highlights and off the field BS seen over and over on Sportscenterlhslep134;1613647 wrote:I lol'd at you throwing your roommate under the bus.
Now the other roommate (another Cleveland diehard) is enamored w/ Manziel. It's like my own version of the OC. The bicker daily about who to get at 4. :laugh:
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 7, 2014 6:42pm
lol you dipshit, if teams are going to give St Louis an RG3 type deal for #2, why in the FUCK would the #26, and a second rounder get it done to move to 1? lolfail.Footwedge;1613652 wrote:It's as if the Bull and the Fox have been reading my postings! Today they were whackin it at the thought of drafting both Manzial and Sammy.
The simplest way of doing it would be to package 26 and 35 for Houston's pick. If needed, give them one of the number 4's as well. The late minute frenzy to draft Manziel includes both the Raiders and Tampa Bay trading up for St Louie's number 2, with packages comparable to what Washington did to land RG 3. How to stop it? Get Houston's number1.
Imagine 6 or 7 pro bowlers on one offensive unit. It's up to you Farmer....you either get it done or you don't.
Idiot Post of the Week
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
May 7, 2014 7:13pm
Thought the same thing. A better deal for #2 than for #1...Commander of Awesome;1613655 wrote:lol you dipshit, if teams are going to give St Louis an RG3 type deal for #2, why in the FUCK would the #26, and a second rounder get it done to move to 1? lolfail.
Idiot Post of the Week
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
May 7, 2014 7:16pm
I will do the freaking math for you once again to show you how retarded your idea is...Footwedge;1613652 wrote:It's as if the Bull and the Fox have been reading my postings! Today they were whackin it at the thought of drafting both Manzial and Sammy.
The simplest way of doing it would be to package 26 and 35 for Houston's pick. If needed, give them one of the number 4's as well. The late minute frenzy to draft Manziel includes both the Raiders and Tampa Bay trading up for St Louie's number 2, with packages comparable to what Washington did to land RG 3. How to stop it? Get Houston's number1.
Imagine 6 or 7 pro bowlers on one offensive unit. It's up to you Farmer....you either get it done or you don't.
http://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp
Houston Gets-#26 (700), #35 (550) and a 4th rounder (82) for a total value of 1332
Cleveland Gets-#1 (3000) for a total of 3000
Here's another site that backs me up
http://walterfootball.com/draftchart.php
Now, no way on the planet does Houston do that freaking trade. You are a moron if you believe they would.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 7, 2014 7:32pm
I love that he keeps putting out these shitty trades thinking that would Houston would bite.
We'd severely cripple the future of the team to get two players. I'll pass.
Hell ESPN today was doing a mock draft, and to move from 9 to 1, required Buffalo to give up the Following:
#9 Pick, 2015 1st Rd, 2016 2nd Round, 2014 3rd, and 2015 3rd.
We'd severely cripple the future of the team to get two players. I'll pass.
Hell ESPN today was doing a mock draft, and to move from 9 to 1, required Buffalo to give up the Following:
#9 Pick, 2015 1st Rd, 2016 2nd Round, 2014 3rd, and 2015 3rd.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 7, 2014 8:09pm
OK. So they won't do that. I'm OK with that. Then you have to sweeten it more. Throw in another draft pick...this year or even next year's number 2. Whatever it takes to get the deal done. Now do you understand, numbnuts?jmog;1613662 wrote:I will do the freaking math for you once again to show you how retarded your idea is...
http://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp
Houston Gets-#26 (700), #35 (550) and a 4th rounder (82) for a total value of 1332
Cleveland Gets-#1 (3000) for a total of 3000
Here's another site that backs me up
http://walterfootball.com/draftchart.php
Now, no way on the planet does Houston do that freaking trade. You are a moron if you believe they would.
Like I said, if I were GM, the Browns would win the division next season.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 7, 2014 8:12pm
So..if I read your post correctly, the Browns are getting a shit deal....AND Houston is getting a shit deal. So which is it Slick?HighRoller74;1613674 wrote:I love that he keeps putting out these shitty trades thinking that would Houston would bite.
We'd severely cripple the future of the team to get two players. I'll pass.
Hell ESPN today was doing a mock draft, and to move from 9 to 1, required Buffalo to give up the Following:
#9 Pick, 2015 1st Rd, 2016 2nd Round, 2014 3rd, and 2015 3rd.
As for mortgaging the future, what future are they mortgaging exactly? Give me 7 pro bowlers on offense and then cry a river on how badly the future is mortgaged. as George Allen was wont to say..."the future is now".
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 7, 2014 8:16pm
Mike Mayock came out today with his latest and greatest mock draft. He has the Browns drafting Matthews at number 4. LMAO. Yeah, the Browns need to correct their 15 drought by drafting a right tackle. What an ass. This guy is actually worse that Kiper Jr, if that's possible. He has Manziel going on the 11th overall. I would love to book his action too.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 7, 2014 8:23pm
So...how about number 26, 35 and next year's number 1? You OK with that? Whatever uit takes.Commander of Awesome;1613655 wrote:lol you dipshit, if teams are going to give St Louis an RG3 type deal for #2, why in the FUCK would the #26, and a second rounder get it done to move to 1? lolfail.
Idiot Post of the Week
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
May 7, 2014 8:24pm
lol fuck no.Footwedge;1613696 wrote:So...how about number 26, 35 and next year's number 1? You OK with that? Whatever uit takes.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 7, 2014 8:30pm
Footwedge is trollin, you can't be this stupid. Everyone ignore.
S
Sonofanump
May 7, 2014 8:34pm
I did along time ago, made this thread easier to read.SportsAndLady;1613704 wrote:Footwedge is trollin, you can't be this stupid. Everyone ignore.
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
May 7, 2014 8:36pm
thisSonofanump;1613709 wrote:I did along time ago, made this thread easier to read.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
May 7, 2014 8:52pm
Sonofanump;1613709 wrote:I did along time ago, made this thread easier to read.
These.vball10set;1613714 wrote:this
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 7, 2014 8:53pm
That wouldn't get it done....but I'd still pass.Footwedge;1613696 wrote:So...how about number 26, 35 and next year's number 1? You OK with that? Whatever uit takes.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 7, 2014 8:54pm
I know we shouldn't feed the troll, but I just love seeing how far he takes it.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
May 7, 2014 9:08pm
The Browns reportedly conducted an "expensive and thorough analytics study" before the draft that "ultimately pointed to" Teddy Bridgewater showing the "best success rate" in the 2014 quarterback class.
Per CBS Sports' Jason La Canfora, the $100,000 study was spearheaded by club president Alec Scheiner. The team commissioned "decades of successful NFL quarterbacks" and took into consideration "all sorts of variables," while incorporating both "film review and advanced metrics." La Canfora reports analytics are "taken very seriously within the Browns' organization," and believes Bridgewater could be in play for Cleveland at the Nos. 26 and 35 overall picks.
Per CBS Sports' Jason La Canfora, the $100,000 study was spearheaded by club president Alec Scheiner. The team commissioned "decades of successful NFL quarterbacks" and took into consideration "all sorts of variables," while incorporating both "film review and advanced metrics." La Canfora reports analytics are "taken very seriously within the Browns' organization," and believes Bridgewater could be in play for Cleveland at the Nos. 26 and 35 overall picks.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
May 7, 2014 9:25pm
FOX Sports' Jay Glazer reports the Texans are seeking three first-round picks and a second-round pick if they are to trade down from No. 1 overall.
This is essentially the same thing ESPN's Ed Werder reported Tuesday evening. Glazer added that the Texans' demands are on a "sliding scale," which means the further they have to move back, the more the team trading up will have to surrender. If the Texans stick to their demands, they'll pick first tomorrow night.
This is essentially the same thing ESPN's Ed Werder reported Tuesday evening. Glazer added that the Texans' demands are on a "sliding scale," which means the further they have to move back, the more the team trading up will have to surrender. If the Texans stick to their demands, they'll pick first tomorrow night.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 7, 2014 9:26pm
After reading this, gotta laugh at footwedge saying it could be had for the 26th pick and a second rounder lolDr. KnOiTaLL;1613748 wrote:FOX Sports' Jay Glazer reports the Texans are seeking three first-round picks and a second-round pick if they are to trade down from No. 1 overall.
This is essentially the same thing ESPN's Ed Werder reported Tuesday evening. Glazer added that the Texans' demands are on a "sliding scale," which means the further they have to move back, the more the team trading up will have to surrender. If the Texans stick to their demands, they'll pick first tomorrow night.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
May 7, 2014 9:29pm
I love Bridgewater but have to LOL at using analytics to determine success rate of a player who has never played a down in the NFL in his life.
Also, Footwedge is a ratard.
Also, Footwedge is a ratard.
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 7, 2014 9:33pm
Well I mean we could throw in next years 2nd lol.SportsAndLady;1613750 wrote:After reading this, gotta laugh at footwedge saying it could be had for the 26th pick and a second rounder lol
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
May 7, 2014 9:37pm
Houston would basically tell us to fuck off with any deal that didnt include our 4th.HighRoller74;1613754 wrote:Well I mean we could throw in next years 2nd lol.