F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 6, 2014 5:13pm
Did jmog add anything of substance to this thread? Some things never change jmog.jmog;1613218 wrote:Did Failwedge really just talk about the Browns winning the Central? That's about as classic as his Breowns will make the playoffs thread.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 6, 2014 5:14pm
Another quality substance post from our resident idiot.lhslep134;1613226 wrote:Why stop at winning the All-American Football Conference? The Premiere League is ripe for the taking.
ohiobucks1
Posts: 4,915
May 6, 2014 6:05pm
OB1s updated wants/realistic gets:
4. Robinson
26. Fuller/Roby
35. TBW
I'd still be ok with any combo of Robinson, JFF, Mack, Watkins, Evans, Clowney, or Gilbert with our first pick (depending on if we trade down for Gilbert or Evans)
I'd also be ok with Fuller, Roby, Latimer, TBW, and a host of others at 26.
I just want us to get a combo of QB, WR, Guard or T, CB, LB. with our first 6 picks. IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?
4. Robinson
26. Fuller/Roby
35. TBW
I'd still be ok with any combo of Robinson, JFF, Mack, Watkins, Evans, Clowney, or Gilbert with our first pick (depending on if we trade down for Gilbert or Evans)
I'd also be ok with Fuller, Roby, Latimer, TBW, and a host of others at 26.
I just want us to get a combo of QB, WR, Guard or T, CB, LB. with our first 6 picks. IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 6, 2014 6:13pm
We aren't getting tbw at 35. A trade up to 32 is more realistic.ohiobucks1;1613239 wrote:OB1s updated wants/realistic gets:
4. Robinson
26. Fuller/Roby
35. TBW
I'd still be ok with any combo of Robinson, JFF, Mack, Watkins, Evans, Clowney, or Gilbert with our first pick (depending on if we trade down for Gilbert or Evans)
I'd also be ok with Fuller, Roby, Latimer, TBW, and a host of others at 26.
I just want us to get a combo of QB, WR, Guard or T, CB, LB. with our first 6 picks. IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?
iclfan2
Posts: 6,360
May 6, 2014 6:30pm
Fuck Roby. Footwedge suicide watch: Jay Glazer just said Browns will not be drafting JFF
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 6, 2014 6:44pm
So Louis Riddick of ESPN has the Browns selecting......
Aaron Donald
Aaron Donald
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
May 6, 2014 7:52pm
He is borderline obsessed with Donald.HighRoller74;1613249 wrote:So Louis Riddick of ESPN has the Browns selecting......
Aaron Donald
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 6, 2014 9:02pm
I was talking to my friend about this. If the browns traded down to say 10, I would not QQ about Donald.HighRoller74;1613249 wrote:So Louis Riddick of ESPN has the Browns selecting......
Aaron Donald
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 6, 2014 9:19pm
I wouldn't either, wouldn't be a terrible move. He was very productive in College, and seems to be high on a lot of draft boards.like_that;1613307 wrote:I was talking to my friend about this. If the browns traded down to say 10, I would not QQ about Donald.
Just couldn't see taking him at 4, too much talent will be left on the board that i'd much rather have.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
May 7, 2014 12:55am
I think Donald's the best defensive lineman in the draft (Mack, Barr, Clowney are not true lineman, they're hybrid players). If Pettine, who has proven he knows how to run a defense, feels like Donald will help us a ton at 4, I'm OK with it. I'd rather draft offense, but anyone we take on the defensive side the ball is fine by me.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 7, 2014 9:12am
I'm still liking a QB at 4. That's what I want.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
May 7, 2014 10:34am
The only way I like QB at 4 is if they specifically want a guy and KNOW he won't be available at 26.SportsAndLady;1613463 wrote:I'm still liking a QB at 4. That's what I want.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 7, 2014 10:38am
Well, obviously.Dr. KnOiTaLL;1613510 wrote:The only way I like QB at 4 is if they specifically want a guy and KNOW he won't be available at 26.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
May 7, 2014 1:55pm
Just saying... you said "I want a QB at 4, it's what I want," as if that's the only option in your opinion. I was simply stating that opinion would be very short-sighted.SportsAndLady;1613511 wrote:Well, obviously.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 7, 2014 2:23pm
I said I want a QB at 4, assuming you know I meant I don't just want any QB at 4, I want a QB the FO feels would win. I don't just want Aaron Murray at 4 lolDr. KnOiTaLL;1613587 wrote:Just saying... you said "I want a QB at 4, it's what I want," as if that's the only option in your opinion. I was simply stating that opinion would be very short-sighted.
I also didn't say QB was the only option. I said that's what I want.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 7, 2014 3:08pm
I don't want a QB at 4, but if we do go QB I want Bridgewater. I do not want any part of a system QB in Manziel who will be Weeden 2.0 and out of the league in 3 years.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 7, 2014 3:16pm
Weeden 2.0 is reserved for Carr.sleeper;1613607 wrote:I don't want a QB at 4, but if we do go QB I want Bridgewater. I do not want any part of a system QB in Manziel who will be Weeden 2.0 and out of the league in 3 years.
sleeper
Posts: 27,879
May 7, 2014 3:31pm
Manziel. Tebow 2.0like_that;1613613 wrote:Weeden 2.0 is reserved for Carr.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
May 7, 2014 4:06pm
Hopefully the Dawg Pound can get out ahead of the pack tomorrow night...
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
May 7, 2014 4:13pm
Reps, one of my all time fave gifsDr. KnOiTaLL;1613626 wrote:Hopefully the Dawg Pound can get out ahead of the pack tomorrow night...
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
May 7, 2014 4:17pm
I know you're going to be stubborn about this but whatever I'll try anyways: the only "system" Manziel played in was a hybrid one designed by Sumlin and not the same Air-Raid offense that he ran at Houston.sleeper;1613607 wrote:I don't want a QB at 4, but if we do go QB I want Bridgewater. I do not want any part of a system QB in Manziel who will be Weeden 2.0 and out of the league in 3 years.
Further, all of these examples of "system" QBs that I know you love to refer to (Weeden, Keenum, Colt Brennan) would not have been able to put up the numbers Manziel did in the SEC and often times looked mediocre against the only NFL quality competition they played.
If you're going to harp on Manziel, harp on his actual issues* instead of some dumb and overly simplistic concept like system.
*iffy footwork, tendency to stare down reads, too trigger happy to leave the pocket.
Q
queencitybuckeye
Posts: 7,117
May 7, 2014 5:01pm
massive character issues.lhslep134;1613629 wrote: *iffy footwork, tendency to stare down reads, too trigger happy to leave the pocket.
Rotinaj
Posts: 7,699
May 7, 2014 5:04pm
Massive? LOLqueencitybuckeye;1613640 wrote:massive character issues.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
May 7, 2014 5:06pm
My roommate thinks the same thing, although the only thing he knows about Manziel is what has been pumped out by ESPN. Coincidence?queencitybuckeye;1613640 wrote:massive character issues.
Manziel will be fine in the NFL regarding his "character issues."
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 7, 2014 5:09pm
I LOL'd too. What a thug 20 year old going out to college parties and shit.Rotinaj;1613641 wrote:Massive? LOL