SportsAndLady;1557861 wrote:The weeden pick was one of the worst moments in my browns fanhood career. I got sick that night thinking about the next shitty 3 years of 4-12 seasons. Smh.

wes_mantooth;1557862 wrote:It was bad, but right now the trich pick looks just as bad.

Dr. KnOiTaLL;1557863 wrote:I disagree. At least we got another first out of the TRich pick, even if we had to wait for 2 seasons.

Dr. KnOiTaLL;1557863 wrote:I disagree. At least we got another first out of the TRich pick, even if we had to wait for 2 seasons.

Commander of Awesome;1557865 wrote:So we pick a bum player, waste a 3rd round pick to do so, and in exchange get a 25th pick 2 yrs from now? That's shitty anyway you look at it. I'm glad we have a 1st but I'd much rather have a do over on that.

Dr. KnOiTaLL;1557856 wrote:Everyone was saying we were stupid for not making a deal to get that pick. I thought that was ridiculous. There is NO ONE worth 3 firsts and a second or whatever the deal was. If you do your due diligence, 3 firsts and a 2nd are 4 starters. No single player can make up for 4 players. Not to mention, it's a COLLEGE kid. Those kids have proven nothing yet. I think the Browns have been smart in stockpiling picks instead of trading them all away for anything but a sure thing. Now, we can't pull the same crap previous regimes and the Cavs did an blow our picks. Whatever has been done in the past as far as draft prep, I would double it heading into this draft. With the amount of picks we have, if we hit on a large majority of them, we could be sitting in playoff contention next season.

wes_mantooth;1557853 wrote:I was just looking over draft projections...off subject, but god, how awful does that RG3 deal look for Washington right now? The Rams are sitting pretty.

Mulva;1557984 wrote:Too bad for Rams fans they keep blowing picks on terrible offensive players. Austin Pettis, Greg Salas, Lance Kendricks, Brian Quick and Isaiah Pead in the first 4 rounds in 2011 and 2012. Then spent picks on Tavon and Stedman Bailey in the first and third round this past draft, and somehow they still need to upgrade at receiver.

HighRoller74;1557990 wrote:I'd think they have to go after another Tackle, seeing as Jake Long can't stay healthy. But the one player I think its safe to say is off the board for them is Clowney.

I wouldn't take another QB this high if I'm them. Bridgewater lost a lot of his luster this season in my eyes, and I'm not a believer in Derek Carr, or Blake Bortles.

But at the same time, they sit in a good spot to trade down if some team falls in love with one of the above QB's.

1. Houston (2-14)
2. St. Louis - from Washington (3-13)
3. Jacksonville (4-12)
4. Cleveland (4-12)
5. Oakland (4-12)
6. Atlanta (4-12)
7. Tampa Bay (4-12)
8. Minnesota (5-10-1)
9. Buffalo (6-10)
10. Detroit (7-9)
11. Tennessee (7-9)
12. New York Giants (7-9)
13. St. Louis (7-9)
14. Chicago (8-8)
15. Pittsburgh (8-8)
16. Dallas (8-8)
17. Baltimore (8-8)
18. New York Jets (8-8)
19. Miami (8-8)
20. Arizona (10-6)
21. Green Bay* (8-7-1)
22. San Diego* (9-7)
23. Philadelphia* (10-6)
24. Kansas City* (11-5)
25. Cincinnati* (11-5)
26. Cleveland - from Indianapolis* (11-5)
27. New Orleans* (11-5)
28. San Francisco* (12-4)
29. New England* (12-4)
30. Carolina* (12-4)
31. Denver* (13-3)
32. Seattle* (13-3)

Mulva;1558936 wrote:Aren't 21-32 contingent on playoff finish, or was that rule eliminated? I know the Ravens picked 32nd this year.

se-alum;1558935 wrote:Draft order is set. Browns get #26 pick from Colts.

1. Houston (2-14)
2. St. Louis - from Washington (3-13)
3. Jacksonville (4-12)
4. Cleveland (4-12)
5. Oakland (4-12)
6. Atlanta (4-12)
7. Tampa Bay (4-12)
8. Minnesota (5-10-1)
9. Buffalo (6-10)
10. Detroit (7-9)
11. Tennessee (7-9)
12. New York Giants (7-9)
13. St. Louis (7-9)
14. Chicago (8-8)
15. Pittsburgh (8-8)
16. Dallas (8-8)
17. Baltimore (8-8)
18. New York Jets (8-8)
19. Miami (8-8)
20. Arizona (10-6)
21. Green Bay* (8-7-1)
22. San Diego* (9-7)
23. Philadelphia* (10-6)
24. Kansas City* (11-5)
25. Cincinnati* (11-5)
26. Cleveland - from Indianapolis* (11-5)
27. New Orleans* (11-5)
28. San Francisco* (12-4)
29. New England* (12-4)
30. Carolina* (12-4)
31. Denver* (13-3)
32. Seattle* (13-3)

Footwedge;1558960 wrote:Number 4 is pretty damn good considering only one 4-12 team picks ahead of them. But didnt Jax beat the Browns? I guess head to head doesnt play a roll here.

like_that;1557869 wrote:Remember when the low life said tried to remind us in every game thread how dumb the browns were for not making that deal? LOL.

Commander of Awesome;1557876 wrote:For said:

said_aouita;1558987 wrote:Obviously the Browns are doing a lot better not making that pick.

Does your ankle hurt on cold days?




Funny....

Actually the Redskins may be worse than the Browns right now but it's not all rg3's fault either.

like_that;1558991 wrote:You think the browns would have been better off making that trade? Please say yes, so you can further prove your lack of knowledge.