2014 Cleveland Browns Offseason Thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ 2014 Cleveland Browns Offseason Thread
Terry_Tate's avatar

Terry_Tate

Senior Member

7,606 posts
Nov 11, 2014 9:55 PM
Laley23;1673560 wrote:This class is gonna be pretty ridiculous.

ODB, Watkins, Evans and Benjamin we know about.

But, when Wayne retires, Moncrief will be a beast with Luck throwing to him.

Mathews and Bryant have been pretty damn impressive as well.

Not sure whats not to like about the class. Its is deep and top heavy all in one.
And you didn't even name Brandin Cooks, Allen Robinson, John Brown, Allen Hurns, or Davante Adams, lol. So much depth in this class.
Nov 11, 2014 9:55pm
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Nov 11, 2014 10:46 PM
Laley23;1673563 wrote:I must be miss reading this post...
Best ever was my "meh"

No one is saying this class doesn't appear to be a really Good one.
Nov 11, 2014 10:46pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Nov 11, 2014 10:54 PM
SportsAndLady;1673584 wrote:Best ever was my "meh"

No one is saying this class doesn't appear to be a really Good one.
Gotcha.

Yeah, best ever is ridiculous to say after 10 weeks.

But, it has the chance to be special. There are some really good looking WRs out there.
Nov 11, 2014 10:54pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Nov 12, 2014 1:40 AM
Laley23;1673560 wrote:This class is gonna be pretty ridiculous.

ODB, Watkins, Evans and Benjamin we know about.

But, when Wayne retires, Moncrief will be a beast with Luck throwing to him.

Mathews and Bryant have been pretty damn impressive as well.

Not sure whats not to like about the class. Its is deep and top heavy all in one.
This shows your colts bias in unreal fashion. Instead of naming cooks, Robinson, etc, you name moncrief
Nov 12, 2014 1:40am
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Nov 12, 2014 7:37 AM
DeyDurkie5;1673595 wrote:This shows your colts bias in unreal fashion. Instead of naming cooks, Robinson, etc, you name moncrief
At no point was I naming a list in any kind of order. Simply throwing out names off the top of my head.
Nov 12, 2014 7:37am
SportsAndLady's avatar

SportsAndLady

Senior Member

35,632 posts
Nov 12, 2014 8:17 AM
Subliminal bias..lol
Nov 12, 2014 8:17am
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Nov 12, 2014 9:31 AM
SportsAndLady;1673618 wrote:Subliminal bias..lol
In listing him, probably lol. Since he is on the Colts, I always think of him when thinking about future WRs

If I were to rank them, he would be around 10th though.
Nov 12, 2014 9:31am
Mulva's avatar

Mulva

Senior Member

13,650 posts
Nov 12, 2014 9:45 AM
I didn't say best rookie class ever. I said best collective rookie season ever.
Nov 12, 2014 9:45am
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 12, 2014 9:52 AM
True or False: The Browns would be undefeated if they had Josh Gordon.
Nov 12, 2014 9:52am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Nov 12, 2014 9:57 AM
sleeper;1673649 wrote:True or False: The Browns would be undefeated if they had Josh Gordon.
False. They would've found a way to lose one of those. I think he may have been the difference maker in the Pittsburgh/Baltimore games but Hoyer was so epically bad in the JAX game that I don't think even Gordon could've saved him. Although, Gordon may have opened up the running game a little against JAX. 8-1, possibly.

Now if we were talking Johnny Football, they would've been 11-0 in those nine games. :rolleyes:
Nov 12, 2014 9:57am
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Nov 12, 2014 10:03 AM
True or False: Cleveland would be 0-9 with Manziel at QB.
Nov 12, 2014 10:03am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
Nov 12, 2014 10:06 AM
False.
Nov 12, 2014 10:06am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
Nov 12, 2014 10:24 AM
sleeper;1673653 wrote:True or False: Cleveland would be 0-9 with Manziel at QB.
Incomplete because I think Hoyer would've taken over, due to injury to Manziel, by now.
Nov 12, 2014 10:24am
T

thavoice

Senior Member

14,376 posts
Nov 12, 2014 12:06 PM
sleeper;1673653 wrote:True or False: Cleveland would be 0-9 with Manziel at QB.
False. they played the steelers twice so would beat them once no matter the QB
Nov 12, 2014 12:06pm
lhslep134's avatar

lhslep134

why so serious?

9,774 posts
Nov 12, 2014 12:11 PM
Mulva;1673642 wrote:I didn't say best rookie class ever. I said best collective rookie season ever.
I got that. I don't think others did based on the conversation that followed.
Nov 12, 2014 12:11pm
J

jmog

Senior Member

6,567 posts
Nov 12, 2014 1:04 PM
I wouldn't say 0-9, but let's make the vast assumption that Manziel would be healthy for 9 games straight in the NFL while being a scrambler (big assumption). I'd say we'd be 3-6 or 4-5 at best right now with a rookie QB.
Nov 12, 2014 1:04pm
F

Footwedge

Senior Member

9,265 posts
Nov 12, 2014 7:11 PM
sleeper;1673653 wrote:True or False: Cleveland would be 0-9 with Manziel at QB.
8-1. If you're 6-3 with the mediocre quarterback, you have to figure 1 or 2 more wins with a stud.
Nov 12, 2014 7:11pm
DeyDurkie5's avatar

DeyDurkie5

Senior Member

11,324 posts
Nov 12, 2014 9:17 PM
Hey guys, why the fuck are you still on the offseason thread??
Nov 12, 2014 9:17pm
GOONx19's avatar

GOONx19

An exceptional poster.

7,147 posts
Nov 12, 2014 9:26 PM
Because that was the last time the Hoyer/Manziel situation was actually a debate.
Nov 12, 2014 9:26pm
Heretic's avatar

Heretic

Son of the Sun

18,820 posts
Nov 13, 2014 11:35 AM
GOONx19;1673867 wrote:Because that was the last time the Hoyer/Manziel situation was actually a debate.
Except for two people. For them, it will be an eternal debate that will go on long after Hoyer is no longer a Brown.

Next year, when the team is, say 1-3 with Johnny, nothing will be his fault. It will be all on Pettine and the front office for starting Hoyer and causing unrepairable damage to Johnny's psyche.
Nov 13, 2014 11:35am