WebFire;1532601 wrote:Sounds a bit uptight to me.

Manhattan Buckeye;1532603 wrote:I'm not the person that called another person's wife a bitch, because we don't post strange photos of ourselves on social media. Perhaps we are strange but not any of our FB friends ever posted a photo like that.

hasbeen;1532593 wrote:sounds like your wife is a bitch and your relationship sucks.

Pick6;1532675 wrote:Divorce for touching inappropriately?

WebFire;1532601 wrote:Sounds a bit uptight to me.

GoChiefs;1532679 wrote:This. I wouldn't call her a bitch, but definitely seems uptight. This isn't 1950 anymore.

Manhattan Buckeye;1532683 wrote:Then post a picture of your wife/significant other here. Most people don't post pictures of your hand on your SO's boob on public sites.

pmoney25;1532528 wrote:So people seeing you do that in public in real time is not bad, but posting a picture of it would be?

gut;1532713 wrote:A) without the picture, there's no proof as grounds for termination (not that it matters with at-will employees, but most employers won't act without evidence)
B) there are perhaps only a few dozen people who see you do that in public, but posting a picture on line enables everyone to witness it

It's comically sad that this is even a debate. There appears to be an incorrectable level of ignorance with respect to professional conduct - again, not about what is right or what is fair but what is expected.

pmoney25;1532718 wrote:I mentioned multiple times I have no issue with the firing because the school can do what they want. I understand professional conduct. The debate moved on to the type of people who would report this or be offended. Also people who say it is immoral or inappropriate but do similar things.

Way to pay attention.

gut;1532734 wrote:Oh, MY APOLOGIES.

Based on the quote of yours I responded to, it was not clear the debate had moved on nor that you understood professional conduct (as indicated by you asking the question in the firs tplace). Perhaps you had an epiphany in the past 7 hours, for which I congratulate you.

jmog;1532668 wrote:I don't know MB from Adam, but to be quite honest that was an asshole thing to say.

Calling a poster's wife a bitch is uncalled for.

Manhattan Buckeye;1532669 wrote:I've got the thick skin to handle it...I'm just curious if all of these people have bikini photos of their wives, why aren't they posting them here?

majorspark;1532677 wrote:Not touching inappropriately but posting a pick of him touching breast publicly on the internet. I have no idea what Mrs. MB does for a living but as you can see these types of things can have consequences on one's career. That could be a problem.

My wife would be very pissed if I posted something like that on Facebook. She would likely not divorce me but her trust in me and my judgement would definitely be shaken.

GoChiefs;1532685 wrote:I would have zero problems posting a picture of me touching my wife's boob on Facebook, and she wouldn't give a shit either.

hasbeen;1532884 wrote: Mainly because we're not a bunch of proper tools.

gut;1532901 wrote:In other words, people "proper tools" typically consider to be trash.

pmoney25;1532741 wrote:My question had nothing to do with professional conduct. It was just a question asking if he did those things in public and it being ok because no one took a picture.

hasbeen;1532903 wrote:You consider the picture originally posted as trash? If that's the case, then fuck your standards.

gut;1532922 wrote:No, POSTING that photo for the world to see is typically the sort of thing expected of tacky, crude white-trash.

gut;1532922 wrote:No, POSTING that photo for the world to see is typically the sort of thing expected of tacky, crude white-trash.