Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

Notre dame to the acc?

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ Notre dame to the acc?
T

Tiernan

Senior Member

13,021 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:10 PM
Can't wait for that first Dookie vs Potato Eaters grid clash...watta game!
Sep 12, 2012 11:10am
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:15 PM
Big East is saying ND will have to pay $5 million and give 27 months notice to make move to the ACC.
Sep 12, 2012 11:15am
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:24 PM
killer_ewok;1268747 wrote:Big East is saying ND will have to pay $5 million and give 27 months notice to make move to the ACC.

I imagine Swarbrick will get that notice lowered
Sep 12, 2012 11:24am
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:30 PM
killer_ewok;1268747 wrote:Big East is saying ND will have to pay $5 million and give 27 months notice to make move to the ACC.

Or they'll just throw a ton of money (and they have it) at the BE to shut them up like everyone else has.
Sep 12, 2012 11:30am
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:36 PM
I think its a great move.

Question is, imo, who do they keep on the schedule. Do you keep all 5 of Navy (for sure), UofM, USC, MSU and Stanford? Could even throw in Purdue to that equation.

I know they can keep all of them on the schedule, but will they? I think its too much, year in year out, to be playing them as well as possibly (2 of) FSU/Clemson/VA TECH/Miami Fl.
Sep 12, 2012 11:36am
B

bigkahuna

Senior Member

4,454 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:38 PM
Tiernan;1268679 wrote:Makes alot of sense to send your Girls Golf Team to Ga Tech on a 36 Hr RT van ride but then again the Catoleigh Church never does anything the smart or easy way.
That's the same as the 36HR RT van ride to Houston or 32HR RT van ride to SMU, or the 34 HR RT van ride to CFU with the new additions to the Big East right?

BTW, Ga. Tech would only be ≈ 22HR RT.
karen lotz;1268754 wrote:I imagine Swarbrick will get that notice lowered
Or pay the higher bail out price like Pitt and 'Cuse did.

Notre Dame's football schedule will actually be pretty brutal every year

5 ACC Schools
Michigan
Michigan State
Purdue
Stanford
USC
Navy

Then 1 random game to fill out the 12th. It's probably easier for them to complete a schedule now, but damn.
Sep 12, 2012 11:38am
B

bigkahuna

Senior Member

4,454 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:40 PM
Laley23;1268766 wrote:I think its a great move.

Question is, imo, who do they keep on the schedule. Do you keep all 5 of Navy (for sure), UofM, USC, MSU and Stanford? Could even throw in Purdue to that equation.

I know they can keep all of them on the schedule, but will they? I think its too much, year in year out, to be playing them as well as possibly (2 of) FSU/Clemson/VA TECH/Miami Fl.
Beat me to it. I bet they'll have to for a while because all of those games have long contracts. Also, ALL of those games are traditional rivalries. As Notre Dame (from a rivalry standpoint), who do you kick off the schedule? Which rivalry is the most meaningless?
Sep 12, 2012 11:40am
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:45 PM
Don't they take a four year break from tsun real soon?
Sep 12, 2012 11:45am
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:47 PM
vball10set;1268772 wrote:Don't they take a four year break from tsun real soon?
They don't play each other in 2018-2019.
Sep 12, 2012 11:47am
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:48 PM
killer_ewok;1268776 wrote:They don't play each other in 2018-2019.
Thanks
Sep 12, 2012 11:48am
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:50 PM
In order:
SC
Navy
Michigan
Michigan State
Purdue
Stanford

The Michigan series is taking a two year break soon too.

I'd think they would want to keep Stanford on the schedule though. Maybe rotate the B1G schools moving forward, they have a series with Texas in two years and i think a 5 year deal with byu starting this year.
Sep 12, 2012 11:50am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Sep 12, 2012 3:55 PM
Why do they get the ACC bowl tie-in if they aren't playing football in the conference?
Sep 12, 2012 11:55am
killer_ewok's avatar

killer_ewok

iRep

11,379 posts
Sep 12, 2012 4:00 PM
WebFire;1268785 wrote:Why do they get the ACC bowl tie-in if they aren't playing football in the conference?
Not to be a smartass but probably for the same reason they had a Big East bowl tie-in even though they didn't play football in that conference.....because they can.
Sep 12, 2012 12:00pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 12, 2012 4:30 PM
WebFire;1268785 wrote:Why do they get the ACC bowl tie-in if they aren't playing football in the conference?

hmmm I'm not sure. I bet it doesn't benefit the ACC at all though!!
Sep 12, 2012 12:30pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Sep 12, 2012 4:34 PM
WebFire;1268785 wrote:Why do they get the ACC bowl tie-in if they aren't playing football in the conference?
Gotta believe the ACC is anticipating ND joining the conference in football at some point. And because of that, were willing to give in to quite a few demands, mainly on the football front, to get them to switch from the Big East.
Sep 12, 2012 12:34pm
V

vball10set

paying it forward

24,795 posts
Sep 12, 2012 4:34 PM
^^^on ESPNU shortly
Sep 12, 2012 12:34pm
KnightRyder's avatar

KnightRyder

Senior Member

1,428 posts
Sep 12, 2012 4:57 PM
this gives the acc another tomato can
Sep 12, 2012 12:57pm
FatHobbit's avatar

FatHobbit

Senior Member

8,651 posts
Sep 12, 2012 5:05 PM
KnightRyder;1268834 wrote:this gives the acc another tomato can
Like Florida State?
Sep 12, 2012 1:05pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Sep 12, 2012 5:10 PM
karen lotz;1268811 wrote:hmmm I'm not sure. I bet it doesn't benefit the ACC at all though!!

With the way it's set up, assuming ND never joins for football, the only purpose ND serves is to potentially fuck ACC schools out of BCS at large selections.
Sep 12, 2012 1:10pm
KnightRyder's avatar

KnightRyder

Senior Member

1,428 posts
Sep 12, 2012 5:10 PM
FatHobbit;1268839 wrote:Like Florida State?
no like duke or nc state. that is if they were to join for football.
Sep 12, 2012 1:10pm
Z

Zoltan

Senior Member

1,003 posts
Sep 12, 2012 5:10 PM
Michigan, Mich. St. and Purdue are now likely to drop ND from future schedules.
Sep 12, 2012 1:10pm
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
Sep 12, 2012 5:16 PM
ts1227;1268841 wrote:With the way it's set up, assuming ND never joins for football, the only purpose ND serves is to potentially fuck ACC schools out of BCS at large selections.
I guess my question wasn't clear. It was more along ts's thinking. Why would the bowls accepts ND as an ACC school if they are independent?
Sep 12, 2012 1:16pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Sep 12, 2012 5:17 PM
ts1227;1268841 wrote:With the way it's set up, assuming ND never joins for football, the only purpose ND serves is to potentially fuck ACC schools out of BCS at large selections.


Swofford just said they have to be ranked higher than an acc team to take their spot or be within one win to be eligible to take the spot. Again, if it were such a horrible deal for the acc schools, ND wouldn't be joining.
Sep 12, 2012 1:17pm