Laley23;1251526 wrote:Based strictly on the Mod page, I would venture a guess you get more warnings than anyone else on this site. You also break the rules at least 2x as much as anyone on here.

And essentially got off better than most would because of how some glitch in the software didn't let him get stuffed into the basement when it (in theory) should have initially happened because he had so many infractions that the software assumed he was banned.

O-Trap;1251517 wrote:It does look like your first tracked rule violation was an infraction, but then you received two warnings in a row before another infraction.

In essence, it looks like you've gotten more warnings than most people get.

Check again. That information is false.

Laley23;1251526 wrote:Based strictly on the Mod page, I would venture a guess you get more warnings than anyone else on this site. You also break the rules at least 2x as much as anyone on here.

The only deserved warning was my first one, but it was still pretty tame. Pretty sad you don't know the rules around here.

sleeper;1251530 wrote:Check again. That information is false.

Checked it. Screenshot it. You have a PM.

Heretic;1251529 wrote:And essentially got off better than most would because of how some glitch in the software didn't let him get stuffed into the basement when it (in theory) should have initially happened because he had so many infractions that the software assumed he was banned.

lol

mcburg93;1251509 wrote:This is funny to me cause gochiefs read what footwedge said cause he quoted and then proceeded to comment back so gochiefs was not doing his job.

My "job" is the football forum, not pro sports.

xKoToVxSyNdRoMe;1251542 wrote:lol

It's a true story, believe it or not.

O-Trap;1251540 wrote:Checked it. Screenshot it. You have a PM.

This deserves to be shown to all!


We wanna See!

Devils Advocate;1251551 wrote:This deserves to be shown to all!


We wanna See!

He can post it if he wishes. It's his history, and I'm not going to post a member's history without his/her consent.

However, when I checked the Mod forum, it looks like there was indeed a discrepancy between what that report showed and what actually happened, due to a reversal.

O-Trap;1251540 wrote:Checked it. Screenshot it. You have a PM.

Actually, sleeper had received so many warnings and infractions, his count was all messed up, which is why it shows and infraction for a first offense. At one time, he had like 9 warnings/infractions built up.

se-alum;1251590 wrote:Actually, sleeper had received so many warnings and infractions, his count was all messed up, which is why it shows and infraction for a first offense. At one time, he had like 9 warnings/infractions built up.

Yes, I recall that discussion in the Mod forum. I also recall that he wasn't the only one showing that issue.

Too many doosh bags on this site to control. Mods are trolls, I've been telling you that since LJ. Gotta be a friend in the clique to get along or you get trolled, and reporting posts means nothing. New rules don't help when there are still double standards. I got a month ban and my first post back in SB I got trolled. I reported it because it was worse than what I got banned for, and all that happens is the posts get deleted. No ban for trolls.

Well, when the guy who seems to have specifically crafted a sig to troll fans of a particular well-represented college on this site is complaining about standards, there obviously is a problem!

Heretic;1251611 wrote:Well, when the guy who seems to have specifically crafted a sig to troll fans of a particular well-represented college on this site is complaining about standards, there obviously is a problem!

That was before my current sig, and one reason for it. GFY