A) He's actually pretty upset that the forum treats new members like shit.O-Trap;1247880 wrote:a) So he told you? Must be legit, then. After all, that guy who tells kids he's selling candy out of his panel van always looked legit, too.
b) I thought your opinion was that this place was too regulated. If I was incorrect, I apologize.
a) I'm sure he is ... or he's a current member trolling. If I were a betting man ...sleeper;1247881 wrote:A) He's actually pretty upset that the forum treats new members like shit.
B) Unregulated financial information.
B) He shouldn't be forced to disclose anything, just like we shouldn't believe a word he says about any financial data.O-Trap;1247883 wrote:a) I'm sure he is.
b) Private ownership. Why should a site owner be forced to disclose advertisement earnings?
Eh, I've seen it, so I believe it, but I guess you know better. Carry on.sleeper;1247884 wrote:B) He shouldn't be forced to disclose anything, just like we shouldn't believe a word he says about any financial data.
