shit's weak, bro.

jordo212000;1228508 wrote:I'm not popular in those threads because I keep things real

To be completely honest, and this is coming from a neutral side as I haven't had to many convos with you, you are a huge douchebag.

Go fuck yourselves

DeyDurkie5;1228573 wrote:To be completely honest, and this is coming from a neutral side as I haven't had to many convos with you, you are a huge douchebag.

Not here to make friends. Here to talk sports. My opinions hurt feelings from time to time, but that's never the goal.

I haven't read the thread in question in this instance as I've been busy this week and most of this summer. But I find it comical how CoA, Like_That, RDI, etc. are constantly renaming a new "C4F" and honestly believe they are as awesome as they think they are.

First, it seems you always seem to have a beef with some moderator. First it was me. Then I heard TS took the mantle for a bit. Now you're claiming it is O-Trap. Ever begin to think the problem isn't three different moderators who are pretty different people and not familiar with each other but rather your world view. The way you perceive and act with the world is distorted and everything that you do is twisted in such a way to fit into that distortion. Instead of just trying to be raging assholes the whole time, just try acting like a reasonable person would in a conversation face to face.

Second, justt because you have a lot of reps doesn't mean tons of people actually like you and agree with you. You're the essence of trash TV. Most of the shit you say is mind numbing, but it's entertaining to watch idiots some times. As previously mentioned it's mainly a little circle of posters that all seem to have each others back and use that support to justify their actions and words. It's basically a little internet biker club or gang. Just because your fellow gang friends approve of you metaphorically killing someone doesn't make your behavior actually acceptable or by any means appropriate.

And O-trap is right that none of us Mods want to go around infracting people. It's a pain in the ass to have to deal with the bitching of those infracted. There is no reward for infracting anyone. There is only punishment. It's like a parent punishing a kid. No one enjoys it but it has to be done. Everyone would prefer that it not be done. But that's just not feasible and there has to be some kind of ruels for behavior, so just stop acting like ass hats and it won't be an issue.

Remember that there was a time when there was essentially no rules, however, that proved to not be a feasible model for this site as it just made the entire place miserable. We were hemorrhaging posters who actually added substance and every discussion turned into a vulgar version of Stephen A. Smith and Skip Bayless yelling debate.

As I said above, I don't know much about the original infraction or the thread in question. I'm just speaking to a few of the things brought up here. Will my post change anything? Better chance of either of the two aforementioned sports personalities using substance in an argument. But some people need a serious reality check.

Now a piece of advice not directed at anyone. If you do disagree with an infraction receive, do you think you'll be more likely to get your way if you do so crying and pouting or putting together a well thought out post logically stating your point of view?

I would love to see a list of the members we were hemorrhaging. I can't think of any members we lost that were of any substance. Only dumbass trolls like Dynasty and SQ.

jordo212000;1228508 wrote:I'm not popular in those threads because I keep things real

Utter bullshit. You are like the kid who takes a shit in the crowded public pool, steps out and watches as everyone panics, laughing all along saying (in your best Steve Urkel voice) "who me?...I didn't do it." Your act, on Cleveland threads, is EXTEMELY transparent. You only post on those threads to fuck with Cleveland fan posters.

I actually think its hilarious that C4F and O-Trap masquerade as trying to stop the nonsense on this site, improve it, make it more welcoming etc... Yet they infract good posters for friendly banter/ribbing in an obv joking situation, yet Sleeper, Isadore, Turdo, Weeper, etc... go unchecked. That's a hypocrite statement. A "you fuck" in serious business (another point is that the thread title is an obvious joke, poking fun at serious internet forums. A joke that C4F and O-Trap don't seem to get. Probably because they have no friends [That's an obvious joke, yet I can guarantee it hurt their feelz]). You guys are full of shit and talking out of both sides of your mouth.

BR1986FB;1228651 wrote:Utter bullshit. You are like the kid who takes a shit in the crowded public pool, steps out and watches as everyone panics, laughing all along saying (in your best Steve Urkel voice) "who me?...I didn't do it." Your act, on Cleveland threads, is EXTEMELY transparent. You only post on those threads to fuck with Cleveland fan posters.

Amen. +1, and lolz

Fly4Fun;1228647 wrote:I haven't read the thread in question in this instance as I've been busy this week and most of this summer. But I find it comical how CoA, Like_That, RDI, etc. are constantly renaming a new "C4F" and honestly believe they are as awesome as they think they are.

First, it seems you always seem to have a beef with some moderator. First it was me. Then I heard TS took the mantle for a bit. Now you're claiming it is O-Trap. Ever begin to think the problem isn't three different moderators who are pretty different people and not familiar with each other but rather your world view. The way you perceive and act with the world is distorted and everything that you do is twisted in such a way to fit into that distortion. Instead of just trying to be raging assholes the whole time, just try acting like a reasonable person would in a conversation face to face.

Second, justt because you have a lot of reps doesn't mean tons of people actually like you and agree with you. You're the essence of trash TV. Most of the shit you say is mind numbing, but it's entertaining to watch idiots some times. As previously mentioned it's mainly a little circle of posters that all seem to have each others back and use that support to justify their actions and words. It's basically a little internet biker club or gang. Just because your fellow gang friends approve of you metaphorically killing someone doesn't make your behavior actually acceptable or by any means appropriate.

And O-trap is right that none of us Mods want to go around infracting people. It's a pain in the ass to have to deal with the bitching of those infracted. There is no reward for infracting anyone. There is only punishment. It's like a parent punishing a kid. No one enjoys it but it has to be done. Everyone would prefer that it not be done. But that's just not feasible and there has to be some kind of ruels for behavior, so just stop acting like ass hats and it won't be an issue.

Remember that there was a time when there was essentially no rules, however, that proved to not be a feasible model for this site as it just made the entire place miserable. We were hemorrhaging posters who actually added substance and every discussion turned into a vulgar version of Stephen A. Smith and Skip Bayless yelling debate.

As I said above, I don't know much about the original infraction or the thread in question. I'm just speaking to a few of the things brought up here. Will my post change anything? Better chance of either of the two aforementioned sports personalities using substance in an argument. But some people need a serious reality check.

Now a piece of advice not directed at anyone. If you do disagree with an infraction receive, do you think you'll be more likely to get your way if you do so crying and pouting or putting together a well thought out post logically stating your point of view?

tl;dr - but I've never given anyone a new nickname.

@O-Trap - you give Durkie an infraction for telling every thread to go fuck themselves or is that just a joke you can overlook? He did derail multiple threads, but i guess it's fine cause he was drunk and didn't specifically tell a single poster to fuck themselves right?

Raw Dawgin' it;1228661 wrote:@O-Trap - you give Durkie an infraction for telling every thread to go fuck themselves or is that just a joke you can overlook? He did derail multiple threads, but i guess it's fine cause he was drunk and didn't specifically tell a single poster to fuck themselves right?

Or wait until a mod is on a computer so something can be done about it? He did it at what...2 in the morning? It's only 7:30. People sleep and work.

There's an infractions and warnings thread for this reason. O-Trap has been on his power trip since at least 7/12 when I was banned for calling Justin an iFag

http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1224681

jordo212000;1228633 wrote:Not here to make friends. Here to talk sports. My opinions hurt feelings from time to time, but that's never the goal.

This is a great example of a turdo passive agressive post. You are obviously referring to certain members, however your are too much of a douche bag to address them, so instead you make a vague reference. You are in the basement, and you are still too much of a puss. What a joke.

Also, let me get this straight, people's feelings get hurt by your posts, yet you are the one who admitted to posting less, because of CoA and I... Excuse me while I LMAO at that hypocrisy fail. You can spin it all you want, the fact of the matter is you are a douche bag, and many posters realize this. You brought it upon yourself, so don't QQ here in the basement, because no one gives a fuck what you have to say on any Cleveland thread, and they express that in a not so kindly matter.

Fly4Fun;1228647 wrote:I haven't read the thread in question in this instance as I've been busy this week and most of this summer. But I find it comical how CoA, Like_That, RDI, etc. are constantly renaming a new "C4F" and honestly believe they are as awesome as they think they are.

First, it seems you always seem to have a beef with some moderator. First it was me. Then I heard TS took the mantle for a bit. Now you're claiming it is O-Trap. Ever begin to think the problem isn't three different moderators who are pretty different people and not familiar with each other but rather your world view. The way you perceive and act with the world is distorted and everything that you do is twisted in such a way to fit into that distortion. Instead of just trying to be raging assholes the whole time, just try acting like a reasonable person would in a conversation face to face.

Second, justt because you have a lot of reps doesn't mean tons of people actually like you and agree with you. You're the essence of trash TV. Most of the shit you say is mind numbing, but it's entertaining to watch idiots some times. As previously mentioned it's mainly a little circle of posters that all seem to have each others back and use that support to justify their actions and words. It's basically a little internet biker club or gang. Just because your fellow gang friends approve of you metaphorically killing someone doesn't make your behavior actually acceptable or by any means appropriate.

And O-trap is right that none of us Mods want to go around infracting people. It's a pain in the ass to have to deal with the bitching of those infracted. There is no reward for infracting anyone. There is only punishment. It's like a parent punishing a kid. No one enjoys it but it has to be done. Everyone would prefer that it not be done. But that's just not feasible and there has to be some kind of ruels for behavior, so just stop acting like ass hats and it won't be an issue.

Remember that there was a time when there was essentially no rules, however, that proved to not be a feasible model for this site as it just made the entire place miserable. We were hemorrhaging posters who actually added substance and every discussion turned into a vulgar version of Stephen A. Smith and Skip Bayless yelling debate.

As I said above, I don't know much about the original infraction or the thread in question. I'm just speaking to a few of the things brought up here. Will my post change anything? Better chance of either of the two aforementioned sports personalities using substance in an argument. But some people need a serious reality check.

Now a piece of advice not directed at anyone. If you do disagree with an infraction receive, do you think you'll be more likely to get your way if you do so crying and pouting or putting together a well thought out post logically stating your point of view?

This post brought the lulz. Nice to see you back C4F /sarcasm. The best part is C4F tries to act like his nickname doesn't bug him, yet this post says otherwise.

-Sleeper is the one who called out TS, not me. I have just been calling out all the mods lately for turning into little ticky tacky dipshits who are trying very hardly to express their e-power ever since Justin implemented this new rules. The main point of this is to express displeasure with the new rules, because it sure as hell isn't working.

-I love how you pretend to be so self-righteous, but yet you call people idiots when they think your moderating abilities are piss poor. If many posters think you are a shitty mod, then you most likely are. Don't give me this bullshit about "my gang," it extends way more than the actual posters you are thinking of. There is a reason why your nickname has lived on. Keep pretending it's only a select few posters though, whatever let's you sleep at night. I can be lazy like you and call the trigger happy mods a gang, but I am not a dipshit, so I won't resort to that cop out argument.

-No one is claiming reps make you a top poster LMAO. The fact of the matter is, if I receive reps for putting people like turdo (or yourself) their place, then people are expressing their distaste for that poster, and agree with what I say. For someone who thinks so highly of himself, I figured you would understand that, apparently not.

-Please let me know which posters left this site, because of the no rules. I would love a good laugh. Crynasty? Nobody liked him lmao. Tiernan? The mods didn't like him. Capone? Rock? Oh god, how has this site survived without them?!?!? SQ? Well fuck, no wonder why this site is going down the drain, he hasn't been posting!!! You? Good fucking riddance, biggest crybaby on this site. You are the same person who told me through pm you would like to implement a "no cussing" rule. I can lis tmany more of these OC "All Stars" that have left.

You need to take your own advice and get a firm grip on reality. This is an internet site, and the core concept of the site was clearly defined when it was created. The title of the most popular forum of this site is "Serious Business," which was made to mock the idea of taking shit on her seriously. Somewhere in the past 2 months, you guys started taking the idea literally. Well, you have been taking the idea literally since this site has existed. You are just a power hungry sensitive cry baby who will never have real power in his life, so you get off from providing infractions on the internet. I can't wait for you to pm me and tell me about your class ranking and where you are interning this summer in attempt to make yourself look more credible lmao.

Commander of Awesome;1228649 wrote:I would love to see a list of the members we were hemorrhaging. I can't think of any members we lost that were of any substance. Only dumbass trolls like Dynasty and SQ.

Obvious blanket statement is obvious.

BR1986FB;1228651 wrote:Utter bullshit. You are like the kid who takes a shit in the crowded public pool, steps out and watches as everyone panics, laughing all along saying (in your best Steve Urkel voice) "who me?...I didn't do it." Your act, on Cleveland threads, is EXTEMELY transparent. You only post on those threads to fuck with Cleveland fan posters.

+1, he will continue to pretend no one see's through his bullshit though.

GoChiefs;1228667 wrote:Or wait until a mod is on a computer so something can be done about it? He did it at what...2 in the morning? It's only 7:30. People sleep and work.

Or you don't have to infract him, because he was obviously fucking around, just like Hoops and DW were...

+1. Good call on the reps, QQ-Trap said that no one liked me, and I used Reps as evidence to the contrary. He then tried to spin it as bragging or claiming I'm the best poster or something ridiculous. Glad to see that got under his skirt.

like_that;1228720 wrote:Or you don't have to infract him, because he was obviously fucking around, just like Hoops and DW were...

No he said a cuss word in Srs Biz! I'm a dipshit and can't tell the difference between messing around by one of the forums oldest and least serious posters and a troll! Since people disagree with me, I'm going to make a blanket statement about others are just out to get mods bc I'm a pussy. /O-Trap and C4F.

DeyDurkie5;1228601 wrote:Go **** yourselves

This has cracked me up.

Commander of Awesome;1228653 wrote:I actually think its hilarious that C4F and O-Trap masquerade as trying to stop the nonsense on this site, improve it, make it more welcoming etc...

Show me where I said that's what I'm doing. Please cite sources, if you can.

I just try to enforce the rules in place, good or bad.

Commander of Awesome;1228653 wrote:Yet they infract good posters for friendly banter/ribbing in an obv joking situation, yet Sleeper, Isadore, Turdo, Weeper, etc... go unchecked.

Sleeper has been ANYTHING but unchecked. He's had more infractions than any of you three. Isadore doesn't break rules, so it doesn't matter that you or I don't care for him as a poster. "Turdo" is someone I don't recall ever having much of an encounter with, so to date, I've had no reason to do anything. Weeper stays in the Basement, where the stuff he says is allowed.

Commander of Awesome;1228653 wrote:That's a hypocrite statement.

"hypocritical"

But I'm sure you knew that.

Commander of Awesome;1228653 wrote:A "you fuck" in serious business (another point is that the thread title is an obvious joke, poking fun at serious internet forums. A joke that C4F and O-Trap don't seem to get.

Not at all. I got it. I knew he wasn't being serious. Who the hell talks like that when serious?

However, to do something about a "Fuck you," but not a "you, fuck" would be hypocritical if we're to go by the letter of the law.

If you'd prefer that all these Mods for which you have such contempt just use their own subjectivity to enforce the rules, I'm sure that could be arranged ... and I'm sure you'd bitch about that, too.

Commander of Awesome;1228653 wrote:Probably because they have no friends [That's an obvious joke, yet I can guarantee it hurt their feelz]).

You nailed it. In fact, I'm QQing about it right now.

Or it could be that you're the only one who's been QQing this whole thread. Not a single one of the people who were even infracted have bitched even close to as much as you have. Hell, on this whole site, sleeper might be the only person who QQs more than you about it.

Commander of Awesome;1228653 wrote:You guys are full of shit and talking out of both sides of your mouth.

Nobody else seems to be so dense as to think so, but you're entitled to stick your head in the sand if you want.

Raw Dawgin' it;1228661 wrote:@O-Trap - you give Durkie an infraction for telling every thread to go fuck themselves or is that just a joke you can overlook? He did derail multiple threads, but i guess it's fine cause he was drunk and didn't specifically tell a single poster to fuck themselves right?

When did any of this happen? I didn't see it. Sorry. I don't go looking for things to moderate, hence how rarely I moderate anything.

However, if you report it, someone will take a look at it.

GoChiefs;1228667 wrote:Or wait until a mod is on a computer so something can be done about it? He did it at what...2 in the morning? It's only 7:30. People sleep and work.

And have lives ... except for C4F and I, because we apparently have no friends. Go figure.

Commander of Awesome;1228721 wrote:+1. Good call on the reps, QQ-Trap said that no one liked me, and I used Reps as evidence to the contrary.

Where did I say nobody liked you? Actually, the discussion at that point wasn't about you being "liked" at all. It was about the fact that your level of communication is equitable to a teen stoner.

And reps aren't evidence of anything but the fact that someone ... not even someone unique ... liked a post of yours. It could mean 5 or 10 or 20 of the same people constantly like your posts. Doesn't mean everybody likes you, or that everybody takes what you say seriously. That's the problem. Your failed attempt to use anything as "evidence" that you're not communicating on the level of a high schooler was grounded in the fact that what you presented as evidence was not evidence.

Commander of Awesome;1228721 wrote:He then tried to spin it as bragging or claiming I'm the best poster or something ridiculous.

Nope. Never said you thought you were the best. Just thought it was odd for someone to actually keep a tally of their reps and have that information available off-hand.

Commander of Awesome;1228721 wrote:Glad to see that got under his skirt.

Somehow, I think you know better than this actually being the case and just needed something to end your post with.

This is bringing the lulz big time.

So I have a question if I'm the KING of REPS do I get a shirt or a bib?

Commander of Awesome;1228722 wrote:No he said a cuss word in Srs Biz!

Had nothing to do with anything being a "cuss word."

Commander of Awesome;1228722 wrote:I'm a dipshit and can't tell the difference between messing around by one of the forums oldest and least serious posters and a troll!

You must not have read where I said precisely what he was doing. I knew he wasn't serious, but having just infracted someone who looked completely serious, and his post being essentially the same in content (regardless of intent), I can guarantee one of the few on here with a hard-on for railing against the Mods would have called it inconsistent or hypocritical. Then another would have picked it up and used it in several posts, always stipulating that it's not against the rules because one person wasn't infracted for it ... ie, the way like_that does with the whole personal attack thing about avoiding specificity.

Commander of Awesome;1228722 wrote:Since people disagree with me, I'm going to make a blanket statement about others are just out to get mods bc I'm a pussy. /O-Trap and C4F.

Yes, statements like these are why people take you seriously. Carry on.

like_that;1228720 wrote:Or you don't have to infract him, because he was obviously fucking around, just like Hoops and DW were...

Commander of Awesome;1228722 wrote:No he said a cuss word in Srs Biz! I'm a dipshit and can't tell the difference between messing around by one of the forums oldest and least serious posters and a troll! Since people disagree with me, I'm going to make a blanket statement about others are just out to get mods bc I'm a pussy. /O-Trap and C4F.

Sure, it's no big deal in my eyes either, but they were reported by several people.

I'm sure it was just another "look at me, I'm drunk" durkie posting spree.

The mods should just delete posts instead of banning people. They're jumping to drastic punishments when they aren't warranted. If my post was deleted for calling justin an iFag I wouldn't have given a shit. When I have to sit out a month because of it, it's a bunch of bullshit.

They continue to let isadore troll and say "gosh a ruddies" every other post and he gets nothing, and then we fuck around and get bans. The moderating isn't consistent and it's unfair to us regulars.

Bob Dole;1228741 wrote:The mods should just delete posts instead of banning people. They're jumping to drastic punishments when they aren't warranted. If my post was deleted for calling justin an iFag I wouldn't have given a shit. When I have to sit out a month because of it, it's a bunch of bullshit.

They continue to let isadore troll and say "gosh a ruddies" every other post and he gets nothing, and then we fuck around and get bans. The moderating isn't consistent and it's unfair to us regulars.

shut the fuck up, you created a new name and now you're not banned. What's the problem, phaggot?

GoChiefs;1228738 wrote:Sure, it's no big deal in my eyes either, but they were reported by several people.

I'm sure it was just another "look at me, I'm drunk" durkie posting spree.

Reported by several people? Really? What were they reporting? ZOMG he cussed in srs biz? I mean come the fuck on. Tell them to go a pair and quit being a bunch of pansies. And shame on you guys for buying into that shit. I would like to see a list of top reporters, my guess its all a bunch of BS.