Infractions and Warnings Thread

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Thread Bomber's Basement ▸ Infractions and Warnings Thread
Weeper's avatar

Weeper

Member

69 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:45 PM
Those who are sinner shall be punished. Those who cannot accept punishment are weak.

I see a lot of weak people here.
Jul 10, 2012 10:45pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:46 PM
sleeper;1223009 wrote:Let's examine this for a second.

#1: Is Apple a liberal? I would say so based on his posts.
#2: Is Apple a piece of trash? Maybe, as we do not for sure if he is a person or a piece of trash.

Given what we know, the above does not constitute as trolling. I would appeal based on Section 45:1b on the OC code stating "And therein, thereforth, a trolling expression shall be allowable if said expression is factually based AND/OR reasonably factually based on the current evidence".

I seriously think the OC book of rules is getting longer than the US tax code.
Yes, exactly.

Also, I do believe we were told not too long ago that the occasional "ball busting" was ok, but it was the constant personal attacks that would be infracted.

I guess that was a lie as well. OC, we make up rules on the fly!
Jul 10, 2012 10:46pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:46 PM
And let's be honest here, we all love Apple, but if he reported that post I hope he DIES IN A FUCKING FIRE THAT MOTHERFUCKING PIECE OF LIBERAL TRASH.
Jul 10, 2012 10:46pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:48 PM
sleeper;1223009 wrote:Let's examine this for a second.

#1: Is Apple a liberal? I would say so based on his posts.
#2: Is Apple a piece of trash? Maybe, as we do not for sure if he is a person or a piece of trash.

Given what we know, the above does not constitute as trolling. I would appeal based on Section 45:1b on the OC code stating "And therein, thereforth, a trolling expression shall be allowable if said expression is factually based AND/OR reasonably factually based on the current evidence".

I seriously think the OC book of rules is getting longer than the US tax code.

It's actually a short rule book. It states " infract on your own judgement. Biases are highly encouraged. Enjoy!"
Jul 10, 2012 10:48pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:48 PM
sleeper;1223018 wrote:And let's be honest here, we all love Apple, but if he reported that post I hope he DIES IN A FUCKING FIRE THAT MOTHERFUCKING PIECE OF LIBERAL TRASH.
He didn't.
Jul 10, 2012 10:48pm
Weeper's avatar

Weeper

Member

69 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:48 PM
Sleeper: The expert on Hell since 1987
Jul 10, 2012 10:48pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:48 PM
like_that;1223019 wrote:It's actually a short rule book. It states " infract on your own judgement. Biases are highly encouraged. Enjoy!"
lol, true.
Jul 10, 2012 10:48pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:49 PM
wildcats20;1223020 wrote:He didn't.
Then that makes it even worse.
Jul 10, 2012 10:49pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL's avatar

Dr. KnOiTaLL

Trust me, I'm a doctor!

2,682 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:49 PM
[h=2]You have received a warning at Ohio Chatter | General Chat and Ohio High School Sports Talk[/h][INDENT]Dear Dr. KnOiTaLL,

You have received a warning at Ohio Chatter | General Chat and Ohio High School Sports Talk.

Reason:
-------
Rules warning

The pet names are a no no.
-------

Original Post:
http://www.ohiochatter.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1211604

haha... failhook...


Warnings serve as a reminder to you of the forum's rules, which you are expected to understand and follow.

All the best,
Ohio Chatter | General Chat and Ohio High School Sports Talk[/INDENT]
Jul 10, 2012 10:49pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:50 PM
Weeper;1223012 wrote:Those who are sinner shall be punished. Those who cannot accept punishment are weak.

I see a lot of weak people here.

thanks isadore
Jul 10, 2012 10:50pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:50 PM
wildcats20;1223020 wrote:He didn't.
Then my rage is misguided. Apologies to Apple.
Jul 10, 2012 10:50pm
Weeper's avatar

Weeper

Member

69 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:52 PM
This Isadore, I have read his posts. I believe him to be a demon trying to turn those of this community to Satan.
Jul 10, 2012 10:52pm
Tigerfan00's avatar

Tigerfan00

Senior Member

3,427 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:53 PM
Found a picture from the last moderator meeting.

Jul 10, 2012 10:53pm
like_that's avatar

like_that

1st Team All-PWN

26,625 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:53 PM
Wes and heretic are the only two mods (who i actually see post) that have stuck to the original principals of the OC.

Just wanted to make that clear so they know my thoughts aren't attacking them.

(I'm not counting new mods. Not enough data on them)
Jul 10, 2012 10:53pm
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:56 PM
My infracted post was made at 2:45 today.... Why did it take nearly 8 hours to infract if it was that "offensive" to induce a week ban? lol...
Jul 10, 2012 10:56pm
Weeper's avatar

Weeper

Member

69 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:58 PM
Patience is the work of God.

Rebellion is the work of the Devil.
Jul 10, 2012 10:58pm
Tigerfan00's avatar

Tigerfan00

Senior Member

3,427 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:59 PM
hoops23;1223039 wrote:My infracted post was made at 2:45 today.... Why did it take nearly 8 hours to infract if it was that "offensive" to induce a week ban? lol...
They are like a jury taking 8 hours to brainstorm something so simple.

Also, it doesnt matter what you think or want. /LJ'd
Jul 10, 2012 10:59pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jul 10, 2012 10:59 PM
hoops23;1223039 wrote:My infracted post was made at 2:45 today.... Why did it take nearly 8 hours to infract if it was that "offensive" to induce a week ban? lol...
Not everyone sits at a computer all day...


Plus it was reversed...
Jul 10, 2012 10:59pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Jul 10, 2012 11:02 PM
Tigerfan00;1223046 wrote:They are like a jury taking 8 hours to brainstorm something so simple.

Also, it doesnt matter what you think or want. /LJ'd
Tigerfan00 is really bringing on the lulz lately. reps.
Jul 10, 2012 11:02pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Jul 10, 2012 11:29 PM
Ahhh, the boys are back and whining, or what do you call it? Being "active"?
Jul 10, 2012 11:29pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Jul 10, 2012 11:37 PM
se-alum;1223079 wrote:Ahhh, the boys are back and whining, or what do you call it? Being "active"?
Looks like someone is mad their infraction got reversed. How does it feel to be a failure? LOL
Jul 10, 2012 11:37pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Jul 10, 2012 11:45 PM
sleeper;1223087 wrote:Looks like someone is mad their infraction got reversed. How does it feel to be a failure? LOL
You called it, i'm pissed!! Or not, being that this internet message board is your life, not mine.
Jul 10, 2012 11:45pm
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

Senior Member

4,278 posts
Jul 11, 2012 12:22 AM


Someone needs fed, or their diaper changed.
Jul 11, 2012 12:22am
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jul 11, 2012 2:32 AM
wildcats20;1223050 wrote:Not everyone sits at a computer all day...


Plus it was reversed...
You have more posts than me, what exactly is your point?
Jul 11, 2012 2:32am
hoops23's avatar

hoops23

Senior Member

15,696 posts
Jul 11, 2012 2:33 AM
And it wasn't reversed, as I'm still banned lol. Whatever.
Jul 11, 2012 2:33am