A
Al Bundy
Posts: 4,180
Apr 14, 2012 11:12pm
Even if they traded him, there is no way that they trade him within the division.SMITTEMS;1144069 wrote:That's if we SIGN him not if they realize that they (Steelers) can't resign him and end up TRADING him before they are stuck with a 3rd rounder figuring he finishes this coming year first and leaves as a free agent.
SMITTEMS
Posts: 309
Apr 14, 2012 11:50pm
I see how unlikely it is, but still a first rounder is better than a third. Just need the draft to get here. Less than 2 weeks away...Al Bundy;1144385 wrote:Even if they traded him, there is no way that they trade him within the division.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Apr 15, 2012 12:33am
Al Bundy;1144385 wrote:Even if they traded him, there is no way that they trade him within the division.
Exactly. I get the whole "1st rounder is better return than a 3rd rounder" mindset but not when he's going to suit up against you twice a year and make an AFC North opponent stronger.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 15, 2012 7:07am
Failhook fails at trolling again. Nothing new here.like_that;1144347 wrote:Bleacher report and random bloggers are people who follow the NFL for a living? I simple "no" would have sufficed for your answer as oppose to that fail.
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Apr 15, 2012 7:12am
I was completely serious, I don't think they know what they are going to do. Like_that likes start crap and then act like he is Mr. Innocent, his act is old and tired. Cue his predictable response.Mulva;1144383 wrote:I don't think you were really trying to contribute, but I actually completely agree with that.
I highly doubt the Browns FO has made a decision at this point. Even if they've laid out scenarios A, B, and C for who's available I bet the debate is still ongoing for who to take.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 15, 2012 9:51am
Can I request a thread ban for skyhook on here?
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 15, 2012 10:25am
You just described yourself to the T. Nice fail.Skyhook79;1144432 wrote:likes start crap and then act like he is Mr. Innocent, his act is old and tired. Cue his predictable response.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 15, 2012 12:00pm
Haven't heard from BR in a while, so I'll post the Gruden Camp video of Weeden. As I said a few pages back, I could handle taking him at 37, and I believe that would be the end of the McCoy era in Cleveland. However, I wouldn't blame them for passing on him and sticking with McCoy either. Hard to draft a 28 year old and know that he has to start almost immediately to make it worth the pick. Let's here all of your thoughts on the video...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD7KIsg4Kh0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD7KIsg4Kh0
Enforcer
Posts: 2,140
Apr 15, 2012 12:22pm
Get ready to get bashedDr. KnOiTaLL;1144474 wrote:Haven't heard from BR in a while, so I'll post the Gruden Camp video of Weeden. As I said a few pages back, I could handle taking him at 37, and I believe that would be the end of the McCoy era in Cleveland. However, I wouldn't blame them for passing on him and sticking with McCoy either. Hard to draft a 28 year old and know that he has to start almost immediately to make it worth the pick. Let's here all of your thoughts on the video...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD7KIsg4Kh0
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 15, 2012 12:30pm
He should get bashed...anyone who actually gets excitement about drafting ANOTHER big 12 QB, with a 2nd round pick, who will also be 29 years old just completely falls for any QB prospect.Enforcer;1144486 wrote:Get ready to get bashed
Use some fucking logic and just think about that.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 15, 2012 12:30pm
No worries, everyone gets bashed on here. But the truth of the matter is, half of the yahoos on here were throwing a tantrum when the Browns took Joe Thomas #3 overall in 2007. Not a single one of us knows for a fact who will become a solid NFL player until they step on the field, stay healthy, and perform. I simply liked the camp video, Weeden's attitude, and his skills. Take it or leave it, doesn't matter to me.Enforcer;1144486 wrote:Get ready to get bashed
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 15, 2012 12:33pm
Lol you liked his attitude in a taped ESPN thing, where he happened to be sitting with John My Next Door Neighbor Would Be A Good NFL Quarterback Gruden? So we should spend a very important draft pick on him?
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 15, 2012 12:38pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL;1144489 wrote:No worries, everyone gets bashed on here. But the truth of the matter is, half of the yahoos on here were throwing a tantrum when the Browns took Joe Thomas #3 overall in 2007.
That wasn't because of a perceived talent deficiency in Joe Thomas though, moreso drafting a LT at #3 over a highly rated QB (Quinn).
People are bitching about possibly taking Weeden because he simply isn't that good. He's not an elite prospect, and he struggles under pressure. Until we have a dominant O-line, he's going to be dealing with a lot of pressure. I don't like him NOT because he's 29; I don't like him because I think he's a decent at best QB, and would be a waste of a pick at or before #37.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 15, 2012 12:45pm
For the record I wanted Joe Thomas and was estatic when we got him.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 15, 2012 1:20pm
I would MUCH rather take Weeden at 37 than Tannehill at or before 22. Don't overlook the comment that I made that I wouldn't blame them for passing on him, either. If they are confident that McCoy could lead our team (not to a super bowl, but a winning record would be a positive step), then obviously it wouldn't be necessary to blow an early pick on a QB. However, I believe NFL scouts and coaches are a MUCH better judge of potential and ability than any of you (I know, lhslep134, hard to believe with all of your professional scouting experience), so if they find it necessary to take Weeden, I wouldn't be upset over the decision. All I said is I WOULDN'T MIND if they took him, I never said THEY HAVE to take him or THEY'D BETTER take him. You guys are hilarious how short-sighted and closed-minded you are... I bet you would've passed on Arian Foster too...lhslep134;1144497 wrote:That wasn't because of a perceived talent deficiency in Joe Thomas though, moreso drafting a LT at #3 over a highly rated QB (Quinn).
People are bitching about possibly taking Weeden because he simply isn't that good. He's not an elite prospect, and he struggles under pressure. Until we have a dominant O-line, he's going to be dealing with a lot of pressure. I don't like him NOT because he's 29; I don't like him because I think he's a decent at best QB, and would be a waste of a pick at or before #37.
Enforcer
Posts: 2,140
Apr 15, 2012 1:32pm
NO, No one should be bashed for their opinion, No matter how much You disagree with itSportsAndLady;1144488 wrote:He should get bashed...anyone who actually gets excitement about drafting ANOTHER big 12 QB, with a 2nd round pick, who will also be 29 years old just completely falls for any QB prospect.
Use some ****ing logic and just think about that.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 15, 2012 2:17pm
No one should be bashed for their opinion?Enforcer;1144507 wrote:NO, No one should be bashed for their opinion, No matter how much You disagree with it
lol what?!
Hitler was awesome.
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
Apr 15, 2012 2:55pm
S&l's opinion is better than all. He knows so much about football. Ask him about mike sam and will
/sarcasm
/sarcasm
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 15, 2012 2:55pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL;1144504 wrote: However, I believe NFL scouts and coaches are a MUCH better judge of potential and ability than any of you.
So because they're "pro's" they're always right in their evaluations? I mean McShay said Russell had the best pro day he's ever seen, and every FO was gushing over him. Does that make them smarter than the guy on message boards who saw Russell for what he was, a potentially huge bust? According to your implication, BECAUSE they're paid to evaluate, they're automatically better/smarter.
What about the message board poster who uses statements from these "pro's" to make their opinion? I'm not saying Weeden sucks under pressure, these people who are paid to assess such things said so themselves. So now because I use a minority opinion, it's someone less worthy than the majority of these "pro's"? You're too funny.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 15, 2012 3:07pm
I must be missing where I said this? If you could point it out to me I would appreciate it.lhslep134;1144537 wrote:So because they're "pro's" they're always right in their evaluations?
I believe what I ACTUALLY said was that NFL scouts and coaches are a better judge than you, me, or anyone else on here. They spend hours evaluating film, watching players in person, and doing many other things you and I are probably not even aware in preparation for the draft. This type of preparation, and well as experience, certainly puts them in a better position to make decisions when the draft rolls around. Stop manipulating posts in order to stir up controversy. You're just making yourself look ridiculous and pathetic.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Apr 15, 2012 3:09pm
Weeden>>>>>>>>>>>Tannehill. But not worth a high draft choice.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 15, 2012 3:12pm
You said you wouldn't be upset with the decision because they're "MUCH better judges of talent".
The direct inference there is that you wouldn't be upset because you're assuming they're making the right decision. Am I wrong?
The direct inference there is that you wouldn't be upset because you're assuming they're making the right decision. Am I wrong?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Apr 15, 2012 3:12pm
You would think so....but history will tell you that that is not the case.Dr. KnOiTaLL;1144542 wrote: I believe what I ACTUALLY said was that NFL scouts and coaches are a better judge than you, me, or anyone else on here.
All one has to do is look at Mel Kuiper. 4 out of 5 OC hacks are better at evaluating talent that that ass hole.
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Apr 15, 2012 3:13pm
including you right? TP is going to be a tight end or wr.Footwedge;1144548 wrote:You would think so....but history will tell you that that is not the case.
All one has to do is look at Mel Kuiper. 4 out of 5 OC hacks are better at evaluating talent that that ass hole.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 15, 2012 3:13pm
Yeah, because I think my opinion is so much better than everyones just because I don't think in my opinion Weeden is a good pickCrimson streak;1144536 wrote:S&l's opinion is better than all. He knows so much about football. Ask him about mike sam and will
/sarcasm
/sarcasm