Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 11, 2012 1:34pm
I'd be ok with taking a flyer on him, late 5th on. Why the fuck not?
Pick6
Posts: 14,946
Apr 11, 2012 1:40pm
would love it. Nothing wrong with spending a late pick on a project that has shown huge potential.like_that;1141685 wrote:I am all for this. This is the beauty of having 13 picks, you can take a flier on a guy like him in the later rounds.
http://www.espncleveland.com/common/more.php?m=49&post_id=883
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 11, 2012 1:47pm
Commander of Awesome;1141687 wrote:I'd be ok with taking a flyer on him, late 5th on. Why the fuck not?
I wonder how many other teams are thinking the same thing though.Pick6;1141697 wrote:would love it. Nothing wrong with spending a late pick on a project that has shown huge potential.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 11, 2012 2:12pm
This... I feel like we are always losing situations like these. I'd be all for it, though. We need a little rage and aggression.like_that;1141703 wrote:I wonder how many other teams are thinking the same thing though.
S
Sonofanump
Apr 11, 2012 3:30pm
I suggested Kahlil a few months ago on here and was criticized by most stating that it was not wise to take a RT with the #4 overall pick.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 11, 2012 3:44pm
It's not. but I wouldnd QQ about it.Sonofanump;1141785 wrote:I suggested Kahlil a few months ago on here and was criticized by most stating that it was not wise to take a RT with the #4 overall pick.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 11, 2012 3:57pm
+1. The people who QQ about are just looking for the sexy pick. I remember a lot of people QQing when the Browns drafted JT (along with other idiots making fun of the browns for that pick). That pick turned out alright.Commander of Awesome;1141808 wrote:It's not. but I wouldnd QQ about it.
Iliketurtles
Posts: 8,191
Apr 11, 2012 4:05pm
Yeah he could turn out to be a beast. Im sure there are many who are waiting for him to fall. Another guy who I think would be great to get in the later rounds would be Kellen Moore(Probably like 6th or 7th round with a comp pick).like_that;1141685 wrote:I am all for this. This is the beauty of having 13 picks, you can take a flier on a guy like him in the later rounds.
http://www.espncleveland.com/common/more.php?m=49&post_id=883
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Apr 11, 2012 4:53pm
http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth
looks like keith rivers was traded from the bengals for a 5th rounder. i wish the browns would have moved on him. if he stays healthy the dude is a fucking stud.
looks like keith rivers was traded from the bengals for a 5th rounder. i wish the browns would have moved on him. if he stays healthy the dude is a fucking stud.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Apr 11, 2012 5:08pm
Sonofanump;1141785 wrote:I suggested Kahlil a few months ago on here and was criticized by most stating that it was not wise to take a RT with the #4 overall pick.
My only gripe is that I wonder if that is too high for a right tackle. If he was going to stay on the blind side....I would love it
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 11, 2012 5:10pm
I doubt the Bengals would have been willing to deal within the division...shook_17;1141855 wrote:http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth
looks like keith rivers was traded from the bengals for a 5th rounder. i wish the browns would have moved on him. if he stays healthy the dude is a ****ing stud.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 11, 2012 5:12pm
The price tag would have been much higher if the Browns went after him. If you trade within the division, you look to rape the other team.shook_17;1141855 wrote:http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth
looks like keith rivers was traded from the bengals for a 5th rounder. i wish the browns would have moved on him. if he stays healthy the dude is a fucking stud.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 11, 2012 5:14pm
Would it make you feel better ff JT agreed to allow Kalil play LT for one play per game?wes_mantooth;1141864 wrote:My only gripe is that I wonder if that is too high for a right tackle. If he was going to stay on the blind side....I would love it
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 11, 2012 5:21pm
Yeah, you suggested it a few months ago. At that time, it was a forgone conclusion we were trading up for a QB. Quit being a bitch.Sonofanump;1141785 wrote:I suggested Kahlil a few months ago on here and was criticized by most stating that it was not wise to take a RT with the #4 overall pick.
Dr. KnOiTaLL
Posts: 2,682
Apr 11, 2012 5:35pm
I love how mock drafts still have the Browns taking Tannehill... In fact, one recently have the Browns TRADING UP to #3 in order to take Tannehill. It just goes to show that these morons writing articles know just as little as any of us. What a joke.
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Apr 11, 2012 5:42pm
I think in the past these guys would be somewhat accurate guessing what the Browns draft, but H&H keep everything secret, which I like.Dr. KnOiTaLL;1141886 wrote:I love how mock drafts still have the Browns taking Tannehill... In fact, one recently have the Browns TRADING UP to #3 in order to take Tannehill. It just goes to show that these morons writing articles know just as little as any of us. What a joke.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Apr 11, 2012 5:43pm
yes.like_that;1141871 wrote:Would it make you feel better ff JT agreed to allow Kalil play LT for one play per game?
S
Sonofanump
Apr 11, 2012 5:48pm
You apparently forgot to inform Dan Snyder of your forgone conclusion.DeyDurkie5;1141879 wrote:Yeah, you suggested it a few months ago. At that time, it was a forgone conclusion we were trading up for a QB. Quit being a bitch.
OQB
Posts: 6,679
Apr 11, 2012 5:48pm
Dr. KnOiTaLL;1141886 wrote:I love how mock drafts still have the Browns taking Tannehill... In fact, one recently have the Browns TRADING UP to #3 in order to take Tannehill. It just goes to show that these morons writing articles know just as little as any of us. What a joke.
The sad thing is those guys are getting PAID to to do this...we just come on a free forum and speak our mind and predictions....smh!
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 11, 2012 5:50pm
yeah, you didnt' understand. It's cool!Sonofanump;1141900 wrote:You apparently forgot to inform Dan Snyder of your forgone conclusion.
jpake1
Posts: 2,389
Apr 11, 2012 5:51pm
If I'm the Browns I take Richardson and don't think twice about it. Tannehill isn't even a thought. He hasn't done jack to warrant that high of a pick. He's the type of player that gets people fired. I stay away from Claiborne as well. I'd NEVER take a CB that high. I also have concerns about him. Good player, I just don't know how good he is when he isn't playing along side another stud. Certainly a first rounder, I just highly question the value in terms of being a top 5, or even top 10.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Apr 11, 2012 5:52pm
Blount is dumb. He can't pick up a blitz and he can't catch. He's a 2-down back at best, and his numbers were pretty average last year too.Pick6;1141668 wrote:Are the Bucs really that interested in Richardson?? They have Blount, who seems to be working out pretty good for them. Just seems like they have bigger needs..like Clariborne
jpake1
Posts: 2,389
Apr 11, 2012 5:54pm
Yeah Blunt is very limited. It only gets worse the more tape their is on him as well. He'll be lucky to have a Michael Bush type career going forward. He might have a year or two is the Bucs don't take Rich.
wes_mantooth
Posts: 17,977
Apr 11, 2012 5:54pm
I am def warming up to Richardson at 4 as long as we either move up or get a wr at 22.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Apr 11, 2012 5:59pm
Now that the tribe has been officially and mathematically eliminated, can't wait for football to start.