Manhattan Buckeye;750036 wrote:"The penalty for this, is extremely excessive IMO. And it didn't give OSU any kind of competative edge on the field compared to do what would happen with a recruiting violation..such as paying players to come to your school. "
How is this that different?
Scenario 1: Come to "State U" and we'll give you "X" dollars.
Scenario 2: Come to "State U" and you can sell your State U provided stuff for "X" dollars.
Its a stupid violation, whether X is a lot of money or (perhaps, even worse) not much money.
I have no idea where the compliance department was on this, the very first thing you are told as a student athlete is that you can't do exactly what these guys were doing. It certainly creates an unfair advantage for schools willing to allow this to happen. The argument (if one can call it that) that these guys were just selling "their stuff" is a maguffin, a smokescreen, they were taking money for being student athletes, the ONE thing you can't do to maintain eligibility.
Back to the thread, Tressel should resign. He's going to be out in 1 or 2 years anyway, let Fickell show what he can do and the program can move on.
This, all of it.
I had this discussion with my brother in law the other day. He compared tattoo gate with the $180K allegedly offered to Cam Newton as justification for the Buckeye saga to be much ado about nothing. I explained the only difference between the two was that Cam's father negotiated a better deal.
I agree Tress should and will resign very soon (I am guessing after the 2011 season).