Bigred1995;643927 wrote:I think he's referring to things we perceive to be good or bad. To use a recent example:
1. Survival of Congresswoman Gifford = Miracle and the work of god.
2. The killing of an 8 year old little girl = Man's free will to do what he wants!
All somehow fitting in to this same god's ultimate plan for us all! You don't see any irony in that?
The first irony I saw was the notion that anyone who would demand evidence (which, by nature, excludes one's own non-evidence based perceptions) for a God, but not demand that same kind of evidence for inherent good and evil.
Moreover, why is it that I should trust my own perception of what is good and what is bad? A toddler may trust his own perception that shots are bad, because what he knows is that they hurt. However, his perception is problematic in his attempt to establishing the "goodness" or "badness" of a shot, because that perception doesn't ... possibly even can't ... grasp all the reasons that go into getting a shot.
Some of these things in life to which we attribute the "bad" nomenclature may be to use what a shot is to a toddler. I'm not suggesting with any resolution that any or all of them are, but I'm suggesting that there is an equal lack of support for determining, with ANY assurance, any inherent goodness or badness in the universe, provided the assumption that an overseeing being was never there to define it.
The way I see it, if you refuse to accept any supreme being on the grounds of a lack of evidence, you must also refuse to accept that any object, state, action ... anything ... has any inherent value ... at least, if you are attempting to be intellectually honest.
BORIStheCrusher;643932 wrote:Exactly. You can't have it both ways.
That's exactly the problem. Anyone who refuses to accept the existence of a supreme being of the universe based on a lack of evidence must also refuse to accept the existence of inherent value in the universe. As such, one cannot believe in something being inherently good or bad if one does not accept something based on a lack of evidence.