Plan to Bring Ancient Mammoth Back to Life

Home Archive Serious Business Plan to Bring Ancient Mammoth Back to Life
Red_Skin_Pride's avatar

Red_Skin_Pride

Senior Member

1,226 posts
Jan 18, 2011 11:12 PM
Fab1b;642877 wrote:The question I have is if this happens, when does it stop? What will be next?

Well, nobody clearly READ the article that's posted on the thread lol. The only reason they can clone the mammoth is because they found one that contains viable flesh with DNA still intact. The doctor in the article explains that you can't clone a dinosaur because there's no flesh left, only fossilized bone. Bone does not contain DNA. So the obvious answer to your question would be, it stops when they don't have viable flesh from something they find. It will never happen with dinosaurs. The last known dinosaurs died out over 65 million years ago, and nothing that's frozen now (like Antartica, the Arctic circle, or Siberia where they found this mammoth) has been frozen for that long. I know the theory of how they did it in Jurassic park sounds semi-realistic, but finding something like that would likely be 100x's more rare that getting struck by lightning. So all in all, I could see them maybe being able to clone extinct things from up to about 8-10,000 years ago or LESS, but anything over that is highly unlikely.
Jan 18, 2011 11:12pm
killdeer's avatar

killdeer

Hat Trick

1,538 posts
Jan 18, 2011 11:31 PM
Mulva;642550 wrote:

Sometimes, dead is better.
this made me laugh and then chuckle.
Jan 18, 2011 11:31pm
dwccrew's avatar

dwccrew

Not Banned

7,817 posts
Jan 19, 2011 1:01 AM
CenterBHSFan;642540 wrote:Let dead things stay dead.

Like Larry King and Hugh Heffner.
Jan 19, 2011 1:01am
jordo212000's avatar

jordo212000

Senior Member

10,664 posts
Jan 19, 2011 7:58 AM
Red_Skin_Pride;643444 wrote:Well, nobody clearly READ the article that's posted on the thread lol. The only reason they can clone the mammoth is because they found one that contains viable flesh with DNA still intact. The doctor in the article explains that you can't clone a dinosaur because there's no flesh left, only fossilized bone.

I think most of us realize this haha. We were just having a little fun
Jan 19, 2011 7:58am
O-Trap's avatar

O-Trap

Chief Shenanigans Officer

14,994 posts
Jan 19, 2011 8:04 AM
It'll stop after the MANBEARPIG!
Jan 19, 2011 8:04am
CenterBHSFan's avatar

CenterBHSFan

333 - I'm only half evil

6,115 posts
Jan 19, 2011 8:46 AM
Red_Skin_Pride;643444 wrote:Well, nobody clearly READ the article that's posted on the thread lol. The only reason they can clone the mammoth is because they found one that contains viable flesh with DNA still intact. The doctor in the article explains that you can't clone a dinosaur because there's no flesh left, only fossilized bone. Bone does not contain DNA. So the obvious answer to your question would be, it stops when they don't have viable flesh from something they find. It will never happen with dinosaurs. The last known dinosaurs died out over 65 million years ago, and nothing that's frozen now (like Antartica, the Arctic circle, or Siberia where they found this mammoth) has been frozen for that long. I know the theory of how they did it in Jurassic park sounds semi-realistic, but finding something like that would likely be 100x's more rare that getting struck by lightning. So all in all, I could see them maybe being able to clone extinct things from up to about 8-10,000 years ago or LESS, but anything over that is highly unlikely.
There's always NESSIE!
Jan 19, 2011 8:46am
Belly35's avatar

Belly35

Elderly Intellectual

9,716 posts
Jan 19, 2011 10:34 AM
I ask my wife last night about the idea of creating a Belly35 from my DNA
Her reply was .... Fuck No....
Jan 19, 2011 10:34am
Thread Bomber's avatar

Thread Bomber

Message Board Terrorist

1,851 posts
Jan 19, 2011 10:41 AM
Some would say that this would be a Kansas Raptor



I'm thinkin along the lines of a Jesus Rapture..
Jan 19, 2011 10:41am