I Wear Pants;428229 wrote:Jesus Christ guys.
Carnation Mall Cinema, Alliance Ohio.
Prices are:
.
It's why I can see so many movies.
I Wear Pants;428201 wrote:Is that supposed to be a good price?
Laley23;427874 wrote:Going to see this tonight. 6 Buck Tuesdays in Toledo!
And thanks to everyone for putting the **Spoiler** Notifications!
I can agree that Avatar was predictable, but that's not why it was as popular as it was. When people look back at the history of film as an art form, this is THE movie they will remember for kickstarting 3D in movies. Depending on how long the 3D thing lasts will ultimately depend on just how legendary Avatar is remembered. It's not like Cameron or Avatar invented the 3D experience, BUT in 10 years Avatar will be the only blockbuster movie remembered that used it in the early stages of 3D. Put it this way...it's like MJ introducing the world to the "moonwalk". Did he invent it? Hell no. Did he make it famous? Absolutely. Because he was the one that had enough star power to do it. "Avatar" is the same vehicle, just in different medium. It wasn't sold for it's plot. It was sold for it's originality, stunning detail in visual effects and it's availability in 3D. It's not exactly like Alien or Terminator 2 had an epic original or creative plots btw.Manhattan Buckeye;427885 wrote:Agreed. It makes me want to punch James Cameron and George Lucas. Guys that did great things (Aliens, T2....original Star Wars), and then blew it (Avatar [God that plot was dumb and predictable], new Star Wars films), and later sold out for $$$.
Inception won't make as much as Avatar (again, God that movie was stupid) or Revenge of the Sith, but it is a far superior film.
I don't know. And they just remodeled it too. New lobby, seats, bathrooms, everything. Place is awesome.like_that;428500 wrote:How is that even possible these days?
SPOILERI Wear Pants;428656 wrote: SPOILER
Also, I saw Inception again tonight and I didn't realize how much the dialogue repeats throughout the movie. Kinda makes me think that he was still dreaming/in Limbo.
Laley23;428521 wrote:Speed through Toledo after work. Arrive at Theatre at 7:13....7:30 and 8:30 both sold out. FUCK THE 6 DOLLAR TICKETS! lol
Guess Ill have to see it full price or wait another week.
elbuckeye28;429167 wrote:There are 3 or 4 theaters in Toledo that have the 6 dollar deal on Tuesdays.
I Wear Pants;428656 wrote: SPOILER
Also, I saw Inception again tonight and I didn't realize how much the dialogue repeats throughout the movie. Kinda makes me think that he was still dreaming/in Limbo.
Red_Skin_Pride;428580 wrote:I can agree that Avatar was predictable, but that's not why it was as popular as it was. When people look back at the history of film as an art form, this is THE movie they will remember for kickstarting 3D in movies. Depending on how long the 3D thing lasts will ultimately depend on just how legendary Avatar is remembered. It's not like Cameron or Avatar invented the 3D experience, BUT in 10 years Avatar will be the only blockbuster movie remembered that used it in the early stages of 3D. Put it this way...it's like MJ introducing the world to the "moonwalk". Did he invent it? Hell no. Did he make it famous? Absolutely. Because he was the one that had enough star power to do it. "Avatar" is the same vehicle, just in different medium. It wasn't sold for it's plot. It was sold for it's originality, stunning detail in visual effects and it's availability in 3D. It's not exactly like Alien or Terminator 2 had an epic original or creative plots btw.
And I agree, Inception is twice the movie Avatar was in terms of plot and story detail. But Avatar was 10x's the movie of any other film you'll see this year (or probably for the next few years) in terms of visual effects and what I like to call "completeness"...meaning that it took 10 years to make, Cameron left no stone unturned and spared NO expense in order to make the film far above what most films can do in a 8-12 months of production/postproduction. It's apples to Oranges really.
OneBuckeye;431415 wrote:Anyone else think the setup for the whole job and the way they found the architect and explained everything before the job unnecessary(save for maybe the backstory about the wife between cobb and Juno)? I thought these beginning parts could have been done better, but once they started the job it was very good.
SPOILERSBigAppleBuckeye;431486 wrote:SPOILER ...
One theory that I thought of (which may be way off base): the only time (before the final scene) that we see Cobb's father is early in the movie, when Cobb visits him at his lab/office somewhere in the U.S. We know that Cobb left the U.S. after the death of his wife, so we can conclude that this is a dream. The only other time we see his father is at the end of the movie -- unless I am mistaken, he doesn't appear as a projection at any other time. So can we assume that the only time Cobb sees his father is in a dream, hence, the final scene is a dream? Just a theory ... great movie!
