TARP was necessary and there was no other choice. I'm a free market guy and don't generally support bailouts, but the horse was already out of the barn and our hand was forced. The free market guys needs to be a bit pragmatic and do what needs done, and then set about preventing that situation in the future.
And as for the auto bailouts...the free market proponent can't condemn them without also violating free market principles. Namely that the govt, as an investor and having a vested interest (taxes, on the hook for PBGC, etc..), can make a rational and perfectly sound NPV analysis that the bailout is the least cost alternative. Again, if you don't like govt bailouts in principle, you are talking two different things. Because under the rules of the game at the time, the bailout is what a free market player would choose in terms of minimizing losses. Changing or "fixing" the rules is a different story, but you can't change the rules after the fact.
The govt hasn't done much right the past 4-5 years, but they DID get the bailouts right. Now on the housing front they've been far less effective and successful.
gut
Senior Member
G
15,058
posts
G
gut
Senior Member
15,058
posts
Sat, May 26, 2012 6:40 PM
May 26, 2012 6:40 PM
May 26, 2012 6:40pm