Ohio Chatter
Ohio Chatter

Forums

All Threads Serious Business Sports Politics Archive Pick 'ems Wordio
Log In Create Account

Reds vs Indians....Game 1

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Pro Sports ▸ Reds vs Indians....Game 1
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Jun 26, 2010 12:59 AM
That play where stubbs scored should not be an RBI for Hernandez! It should be an infield hit taking stubbs to 3rd, then he scored on the bad throw to 1B that should be an error as it got away allowing Stubbs to score.
Jun 25, 2010 8:59pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Jun 26, 2010 12:59 AM
Then a Gomes single, Bruce double, Stubbs 2-run single, Hernandez infield RBI single, and the Reds are up 9-2.
Jun 25, 2010 8:59pm
BRF's avatar

BRF

Senior Member

8,748 posts
Jun 26, 2010 1:03 AM
I'm glad I saved my vbucks.
Jun 25, 2010 9:03pm
brutus161's avatar

brutus161

The Navy Guy

1,686 posts
Jun 26, 2010 1:07 AM
I just turned the game on, so can someone fill me in on the green hats?
Jun 25, 2010 9:07pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jun 26, 2010 1:09 AM
Al Bundy;401620 wrote:A line example would be something like the Reds -1.5, meaning the Reds would have to win by at least 2 to win the bet.

I'm fine with the odds to win the game if you just keep it the way it is.

Yeah, its fine....but you have to AT LEAST make it so that you can only bet once. I mean this game was 2/1 ad 3/1. Bet on both and hope the Tribe wins, that way you win money...but if not, you are even.

A typical line is gonna read Reds -1.5 or Tribe 1.5.
Jun 25, 2010 9:09pm
jordo212000's avatar

jordo212000

Senior Member

10,664 posts
Jun 26, 2010 1:14 AM
The Indians are baaaad.

In other news, Cabrera looks fine. He stole 2nd tonight and has been swinging the bat well. He appears healthy, he's just been slumping. He's not a career .280+ hitter. He is probably going to hover around .260-.270 all year
Jun 25, 2010 9:14pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jun 26, 2010 1:16 AM
jordo212000;401652 wrote:The Indians are baaaad.

In other news, Cabrera looks fine. He stole 2nd tonight and has been swinging the bat well. He appears healthy, he's just been slumping. He's not a career .280+ hitter. He is probably going to hover around .260-.270 all year

Cabrera is playing the Indians. Their staff and team in general is like vampire blood. It cures shit in like 2 minutes.
Jun 25, 2010 9:16pm
newarkcatholicfan's avatar

newarkcatholicfan

Senior Member

3,199 posts
Jun 26, 2010 1:38 AM
10-3 Reds now.
Anyone want to tell me again that this Tribe team is going to end up .500 or better?

Yeah I know not one person predicted that one here. :)
Jun 25, 2010 9:38pm
newarkcatholicfan's avatar

newarkcatholicfan

Senior Member

3,199 posts
Jun 26, 2010 1:58 AM
Reds 10
Mistake on the lake 3
Final.
Jun 25, 2010 9:58pm
BRF's avatar

BRF

Senior Member

8,748 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:13 AM
20 under now. Pretty classic June Swoon. Try not to relish it too much, NCF!
Jun 25, 2010 10:13pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:14 AM
Cleveland is pretty bad.....whoa
Jun 25, 2010 10:14pm
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:15 AM
Laley23;401643 wrote:Yeah, its fine....but you have to AT LEAST make it so that you can only bet once. I mean this game was 2/1 ad 3/1. Bet on both and hope the Tribe wins, that way you win money...but if not, you are even.

A typical line is gonna read Reds -1.5 or Tribe 1.5.

That is a lousy way to do it, to bet one team or the other wins by 2 or more. They aren't playing to see who can win by two, or lose only by one, they are playing to just win by whatever they can. So the right thing is to do it by odds, but they should always add up to 100%. ie: 2:1 and 1:2, 3:2 and 2:3, 57:43 and 43:57, etc. It always is unfair when a team wins, but loses the bet!
Jun 25, 2010 10:15pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:15 AM
Ironman92;401702 wrote:Cleveland is pretty bad.....whoa

Thanks, dick.:D:D
Jun 25, 2010 10:15pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:18 AM
mhs95_06;401704 wrote:That is a lousy way to do it, to bet one team or the other wins by 2 or more. They aren't playing to see who can win by two, or lose only by one, they are playing to just win by whatever they can. So the right thing is to do it by odds, but they should always add up to 100%. ie: 2:1 and 1:2, 3:2 and 2:3, 57:43 and 43:57, etc. It always is unfair when a team wins, but loses the bet!

lol, how the fuck do you think Vegas makes money?!?!?! There is always the money line, but that is a lot of work for people to do.
Jun 25, 2010 10:18pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:20 AM
thanks al bundy.....I'll mix it up


Did everyone get their vbucks? I only had 10 at stake and forget what I had.....I don't know for sure that I got my 20 vbucks.
Jun 25, 2010 10:20pm
M

mhs95_06

Senior Member

8,167 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:22 AM
Laley23;401709 wrote:lol, how the fuck do you think Vegas makes money?!?!?! There is always the money line, but that is a lot of work for people to do.

I'm talking about this game for fun here should always add up to 100%. If you are trying to make money on running a gambling operation, then the the odds have to add up to less than 100% overall to represent the profit margin.
Jun 25, 2010 10:22pm
Laley23's avatar

Laley23

GOAT

29,506 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:24 AM
mhs95_06;401715 wrote:I'm talking about this game for fun here should always add up to 100%. If you are trying to make money on running a gambling operation, then the the odds have to add up to less than 100% overall to represent the profit margin.

gotcha. Well yeah thats fine. I was just saying do lines instead of the odds since in this case you could hedge your bets to be even or ahead. If you do it adding up to 100, that wont be an issue.
Jun 25, 2010 10:24pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:25 AM
I'm not thinking clearly....had I made this Reds win 3:2 odds and CLeveland wins 2:3 odds


what would a bet of 10 on the Reds got me? 5?
What would betting 10 on Cleveland have gotten me? 15?

Am I lost....I'm not supposed to think in the summer
Jun 25, 2010 10:25pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:28 AM
UANyg and Keebler each won a 1000 vbucks....nice
Jun 25, 2010 10:28pm
Glory Days's avatar

Glory Days

Senior Member

7,809 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:30 AM
Ironman92;401719 wrote:I'm not thinking clearly....had I made this Reds win 3:2 odds and CLeveland wins 2:3 odds


what would a bet of 10 on the Reds got me? 5?
What would betting 10 on Cleveland have gotten me? 15?

Am I lost....I'm not supposed to think in the summer
i bet 25 and won 75.
Jun 25, 2010 10:30pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:36 AM
the odds were 2/1 for the Reds.....how'd you win 75?......why not 50?
Jun 25, 2010 10:36pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:42 AM
Ironman92;401719 wrote:I'm not thinking clearly....had I made this Reds win 3:2 odds and CLeveland wins 2:3 odds


what would a bet of 10 on the Reds got me? 5?
What would betting 10 on Cleveland have gotten me? 15?

Am I lost....I'm not supposed to think in the summer
If it was 3:2, you'd get 1.5x what you bet (so a bet of 10 would return 15)
2:3 would return 6 or 7 I think, 1:2 would return 5 on a 10 bet.
Jun 25, 2010 10:42pm
Ironman92's avatar

Ironman92

Administrator

49,363 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:48 AM
Is 1:2 the same as 1 in 2 chance? If so the $10 on a 1 in 2 chance would return $20 wouldn't it?

2:1 would be $5?

Someone keep helping on the exact terminology? This Reds win was a 1 in 2 odds.....I bet 10 and won 20....where am I gettingl ost or messing up?
Jun 25, 2010 10:48pm
Mohican00's avatar

Mohican00

Dirty White Boy

3,394 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:50 AM
ahhh vbucks. Glad you aren't real money cuz the indians aren't a real team
Jun 25, 2010 10:50pm
Glory Days's avatar

Glory Days

Senior Member

7,809 posts
Jun 26, 2010 2:52 AM
Ironman92;401732 wrote:the odds were 2/1 for the Reds.....how'd you win 75?......why not 50?

because i think its my original 25 bet, plus, the 50. i am no gambling expert though haha.
Jun 25, 2010 10:52pm