big nothin you would like to keep your buckeyes in the midst of things. but you know what that still doesnt put the bucks at the top of the heap. right now if i was to pick a team as the top college football team over the 10 years based on thier body of work and the conference they play in i would have to say florida. you throw in all your buckeyes wins but really its the big ten and we all know its a inferior conference. and as far as 5 straight big ten titles one was shared with penn state who as i recall DEFEATED THE "PINNACLE OF SUCCESS" on the field of play. and you know what i wasnt referring to that 3 point loss to usc as embarrassing , but being you brought that up . it was embarrassing. for the simple the fact that the "pinnacle of success" got beat in shoe in front of their home crowd by a team that didnt finish in the top 20. how does the "pinnacle of success" lose a home game to a team like that?

KnightRyder;416110 wrote:BIG NOTHIN ,

Typical of a an uneducated immature loser of debates teenager.

It doesn't matter what you say , you lost credibility when you attacked the hit king. 4256

georgemc80;416286 wrote:It doesn't matter what you say , you lost credibility when you attacked the hit king. 4256

i said the hit was a criminal. is that incorrect? maybe i was dreaming that he went to jail.

Big Gain;415941 wrote:OH, the game when Freshman Terrell Pryor was thrown to the wolves. The USC team that beat Virginia 52-7, Oregon 44-10, Arizona State 28-0, Washington State 69-0, Washington 56-0, Stanford 45-23, ND 38-3, UCLA 28-7, Penn State 38-28.

You're kidding right? Pryor didn't take over full time in that game, until it was late and already a 30 point game. Pryor threw under 10 passes for the game. No way around it, OSU got embarrassed in that game.

since you brought up comparative scores, did that put OSU on about the same level as Oregon, Arizona St., ND and a little worse than Stanford, UCLA and Penn St.? BTW, USC lost to Oregon St. the week after the Ohio State game.

TheMightyGators;416637 wrote:since you brought up comparative scores, did that put OSU on about the same level as Oregon, Arizona St., ND and a little worse than Stanford, UCLA and Penn St.? BTW, USC lost to Oregon St. the week after the Ohio State game.

should be fun watching BG try to spin this.

KnightRyder;416143 wrote:big nothin you would like to keep your buckeyes in the midst of things. but you know what that still doesnt put the bucks at the top of the heap. right now if i was to pick a team as the top college football team over the 10 years based on thier body of work and the conference they play in i would have to say florida. you throw in all your buckeyes wins but really its the big ten and we all know its a inferior conference. and as far as 5 straight big ten titles one was shared with penn state who as i recall DEFEATED THE "PINNACLE OF SUCCESS" on the field of play. and you know what i wasnt referring to that 3 point loss to usc as embarrassing , but being you brought that up . it was embarrassing. for the simple the fact that the "pinnacle of success" got beat in shoe in front of their home crowd by a team that didnt finish in the top 20. how does the "pinnacle of success" lose a home game to a team like that?

Not only are you IGNORANT, but now you are also a LIAR. Show us where I said "the bucks are at the top of the heap". I DARE YOU.... LIAR.

I'm not interested in "top of heap", the discussion has been about at or near the "pinnacle". The group being considered totals 120. Should there be only one "pinnacle"? If a group is as small as ten then "pinnacle" should be one, but not from 120. Not when the time frame is 10 years. 120 x 10 and you suggest only ONE????

The Big Ten is "inferior"? "Inferior" to who. "Inferior" to how many? "Inferior" when? "Inferior" always? "Inferior" looking back how far. There are 11 Conferences and 120 teams. "INFERIOR"??? Once again you are IGNORANTLY generalizing with no research. "Inferior"? Did you know if you took last year's USA Today's final rankings that the average of the Big Ten's top 5 teams and the average of the SEC's top 5 teams were EXACTLY the SAME. No you wouldn't, you're IGNORANT.

Yes, Florida has had 3 very good teams in the past 10 years. HOWEVER, did you know in the past 10 years Florida teams have had records of 10-3, 9-3, 9-4, 9-4, 8-5, 8-5 and 7-5? Should THE one and only "pinnacle" team have that many comparatively less than "pinnacle" like records?

You have a fixation with "embarrassing" losses. Judge for yourself these Florida games during the past 10 years.

In that time frame did you know Florida lost FOUR games to teams from the "inferior Big Ten? VERY "embarrassing".

Florida lost to unranked Michigan in the Capital One Bowl
Florida lost to Michigan in the Outback Bowl
Florida lost to Iowa 37-17 in the Outback Bowl
Florida lost to lowly Michigan State in the Citrus Bowl

More "embarrassing" losses?

Florida lost to Miami 41-0
Florida lost to Miami 27 -10 in the Peach Bowl
Florida lost to Miami 37-20 in the Sugar Bowl
Florida lost 36-7 to LSU
Florida lost to Alabama in the SEC Title game 34-7
Florida lost to #20 Alabama 31-3
Florida lost to Florida State 31-14 and 30-7
Florida lost to unranked South Carolina
Florida lost to unranked Auburn
Florida lost to unranked Ole Miss TWICE
Florida lost to unranked Mississippi State TWICE

ALL of these games coming in the last 10 years..... EMBARRASSING!!!!! For THE one and only "pinnacle" team.

IMO, there are 5 or 6 "pinnacle" teams over the past 10 years. All have climbed to the "pinnacle" and fallen off and some have stayed closer to the "pinnacle" than others. And ALL have had MANY "embarrassing" losses over the past 10 years.

With EVERY post your IGNORANCE is proven again. In this post you had TWENTY SEVEN grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. You are OBVIOUSLY the SINGLE most uneducated, ignorant person posting on this site. VERY VERY "EMBARRASSING" for you.

ytownfootball;410639 wrote:Obviously criteria needs to be met in order for OSU to follow through with the offer. Sometimes getting the offer is enough incentive to get things straight, other times, like Turner's, it's not. Fact is OSU is a more cleanly run program than you're willing to admit/accept, but that doesn't matter to you.

Don't let the facts cloud your vision and keep on hatin'. LOL

Good old cockRyder. I see you're back to trolling again. Don't let these silly facts and truths muck up your argument buddy.

Big Gain;417412 wrote:Yes, Florida has had 3 very good teams in the past 10 years. HOWEVER, did you know in the past 10 years Florida teams have had records of 10-3, 9-3, 9-4, 9-4, 8-5, 8-5 and 7-5? Should THE one and only "pinnacle" team have that many comparatively less than "pinnacle" like records?

You have a fixation with "embarrassing" losses. Judge for yourself these Florida games during the past 10 years.

In that time frame did you know Florida lost FOUR games to teams from the "inferior Big Ten? VERY "embarrassing".

Florida lost to unranked Michigan in the Capital One Bowl
Florida lost to Michigan in the Outback Bowl
Florida lost to Iowa 37-17 in the Outback Bowl
Florida lost to lowly Michigan State in the Citrus Bowl

More "embarrassing" losses?

Florida lost to Miami 41-0
Florida lost to Miami 27 -10 in the Peach Bowl
Florida lost to Miami 37-20 in the Sugar Bowl
Florida lost 36-7 to LSU
Florida lost to Alabama in the SEC Title game 34-7
Florida lost to #20 Alabama 31-3
Florida lost to Florida State 31-14 and 30-7
Florida lost to unranked South Carolina
Florida lost to unranked Auburn
Florida lost to unranked Ole Miss TWICE
Florida lost to unranked Mississippi State TWICE

ALL of these games coming in the last 10 years..... EMBARRASSING!!!!! For THE one and only "pinnacle" team.

IMO, there are 5 or 6 "pinnacle" teams over the past 10 years. All have climbed to the "pinnacle" and fallen off and some have stayed closer to the "pinnacle" than others. And ALL have had MANY "embarrassing" losses over the past 10 years.

Certainly you know the difference between the last 10 years and 11 years? Do you include Ohio State's 6-6 season to be in the last 10 years? When did Florida score 0 against Miami? Ole Miss went 10-3 with Eli Manning one year they beat Florida. You sure they weren't ranked? Miss. St. beat Florida in 2000, and I'm pretty sure they were ranked as well. I don't really have time to look up all your errors, and don't really care. I never said Florida was the pinnacle of football the last 10 years. There are a few teams that you could make a strong case for, Florida being 1 of them. Ohio State had a great last 10 years, but I probably wouldn't include them in that discussion.

Big Gain;417412 wrote:Not only are you IGNORANT, but now you are also a LIAR. Show us where I said "the bucks are at the top of the heap". I DARE YOU.... LIAR.

I'm not interested in "top of heap", the discussion has been about at or near the "pinnacle". The group being considered totals 120. Should there be only one "pinnacle"? If a group is as small as ten then "pinnacle" should be one, but not from 120. Not when the time frame is 10 years. 120 x 10 and you suggest only ONE????

The Big Ten is "inferior"? "Inferior" to who. "Inferior" to how many? "Inferior" when? "Inferior" always? "Inferior" looking back how far. There are 11 Conferences and 120 teams. "INFERIOR"??? Once again you are IGNORANTLY generalizing with no research. "Inferior"? Did you know if you took last year's USA Today's final rankings that the average of the Big Ten's top 5 teams and the average of the SEC's top 5 teams were EXACTLY the SAME. No you wouldn't, you're IGNORANT.

Yes, Florida has had 3 very good teams in the past 10 years. HOWEVER, did you know in the past 10 years Florida teams have had records of 10-3, 9-3, 9-4, 9-4, 8-5, 8-5 and 7-5? Should THE one and only "pinnacle" team have that many comparatively less than "pinnacle" like records?

You have a fixation with "embarrassing" losses. Judge for yourself these Florida games during the past 10 years.

In that time frame did you know Florida lost FOUR games to teams from the "inferior Big Ten? VERY "embarrassing".

Florida lost to unranked Michigan in the Capital One Bowl
Florida lost to Michigan in the Outback Bowl
Florida lost to Iowa 37-17 in the Outback Bowl
Florida lost to lowly Michigan State in the Citrus Bowl

More "embarrassing" losses?

Florida lost to Miami 41-0
Florida lost to Miami 27 -10 in the Peach Bowl
Florida lost to Miami 37-20 in the Sugar Bowl
Florida lost 36-7 to LSU
Florida lost to Alabama in the SEC Title game 34-7
Florida lost to #20 Alabama 31-3
Florida lost to Florida State 31-14 and 30-7
Florida lost to unranked South Carolina
Florida lost to unranked Auburn
Florida lost to unranked Ole Miss TWICE
Florida lost to unranked Mississippi State TWICE

ALL of these games coming in the last 10 years..... EMBARRASSING!!!!! For THE one and only "pinnacle" team.

IMO, there are 5 or 6 "pinnacle" teams over the past 10 years. All have climbed to the "pinnacle" and fallen off and some have stayed closer to the "pinnacle" than others. And ALL have had MANY "embarrassing" losses over the past 10 years.

With EVERY post your IGNORANCE is proven again. In this post you had TWENTY SEVEN grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. You are OBVIOUSLY the SINGLE most uneducated, ignorant person posting on this site. VERY VERY "EMBARRASSING" for you.

florida also plays a tougher schedule and also plays in sec , which is world apart from the schedule OSU plays and the big ten . if OSU played the same schedul over the past ten years that florida played they would be barely over .500.

Ok, Florida plays in the SEC and that is a tougher conference...but Florida doesn't play a tougher non-conference schedule, mostly because they don't travel outside their region.

georgemc80;418296 wrote:Ok, Florida plays in the SEC and that is a tougher conference...but Florida doesn't play a tougher non-conference schedule, mostly because they don't travel outside their region.

8 conference games compared to 3 or 4 non conference games. Actually OSU plays 1 real non conference game, and Florida does as well. Not much difference in the out of conference scheduling by many of the top teams in the country. FSU has been down the past 4-5 years, but do you think OSU, or any other elite team for that matter, would liked to have played them from 1987 through 2001? Doubt it. Also Miami is on the schedule from time to time. That is OSU's big game this year and next.

I think the Big 10 is 15-15 or maybe even 16-15 head-to-head in bowl games vs. the SEC in the last 10 years. And those games are all played in the SEC's back yard. I don't see that as complete dominance by any stretch.

TheMightyGators;418447 wrote:8 conference games compared to 3 or 4 non conference games. Actually OSU plays 1 real non conference game, and Florida does as well. Not much difference in the out of conference scheduling by many of the top teams in the country. FSU has been down the past 4-5 years, but do you think OSU, or any other elite team for that matter, would liked to have played them from 1987 through 2001? Doubt it. Also Miami is on the schedule from time to time. That is OSU's big game this year and next.

You failed to mention that Florida actually dropped miami from their yearly series.

Also what is Floridas "1" actual non conference game? Please dont tell me you are talking about Florida State.....lol

Pick6;418514 wrote:You failed to mention that Florida actually dropped miami from their yearly series.

Also what is Floridas "1" actual non conference game? Please dont tell me you are talking about Florida State.....lol

When OSU schedules games against FSU and Miami in the same year come back and talk to me. I have a feeling we might be waiting a long time to hear from you. lol

TheMightyGators;418825 wrote:When OSU schedules games against FSU and Miami in the same year come back and talk to me. I have a feeling we might be waiting a long time to hear from you. lol

If this were the late 90s, you'd have a point. However, neither the U nor FSU have had a 10 win season since 2003. But I'm ok with Florida not scheduling difficult OOC opponents. The SEC (as of late) makes up for that.

TheMightyGators;418825 wrote:When OSU schedules games against FSU and Miami in the same year come back and talk to me. I have a feeling we might be waiting a long time to hear from you. lol

LOL Fla St and Miami have been a joke for a long while now. At least admit it. YOu have no arguement here.

dat dude;418861 wrote:If this were the late 90s, you'd have a point. However, neither the U nor FSU have had a 10 win season since 2003. But I'm ok with Florida not scheduling difficult OOC opponents. The SEC (as of late) makes up for that.

How weak is OSU's non conference schedule this year if we use that logic??

centralbucksfan;418867 wrote:LOL Fla St and Miami have been a joke for a long while now. At least admit it. YOu have no arguement here.

So the Miami/OSU game isn't as big as everyone in central Ohio is making it out to be?? Amazing double standard. Wow.

karen lotz;418869 wrote:How weak is OSU's non conference schedule this year if we use that logic??

How about this logic...since the season has yet to be played...how do you know? You don't.

karen lotz;418869 wrote:How weak is OSU's non conference schedule this year if we use that logic??

Did I proclaim the OOC schedule as being difficult?

karen lotz;418875 wrote:So the Miami/OSU game isn't as big as everyone in central Ohio is making it out to be?? Amazing double standard. Wow.

Double standard before the season has even started? Wow, you must have your crystal ball out!! Your freaking amazing! I talk about the past, you the future! Impressive! lol

centralbucksfan;418877 wrote:How about this logic...since the season has yet to be played...how do you know? You don't.

You just fucking said FSU and Miami have been a joke for some time now. So between now and the second week of September Miami will all of a sudden be a great team? Jesus Christ do you think before you type?

centralbucksfan;418882 wrote:Double standard before the season has even started? Wow, you must have your crystal ball out!! Your freaking amazing! I talk about the past, you the future! Impressive! lol

I'm not the one saying OSU/Miami is the college game of the year.

karen lotz;418885 wrote:I'm not the one saying OSU/Miami is the college game of the year.

And who exactly has said this? Your just like all the other moron haters...making shit up as you go. Do you just make shit up as you type?