Is Nickelback the Worst Band Ever?

Home Archive Serious Business Is Nickelback the Worst Band Ever?
M

Manhattan Buckeye

Senior Member

7,566 posts
May 21, 2010 8:46 AM
"They didn't focus on making hit singles,"

Indeed, they didn't release any singles from In Utero, it is difficult to have a "hit" when you don't send singles to Top 40 stations. I think in some regards Cobain is held in too high of a regard, but it is unquestionable IMO that Nevermind and In Utero were two of the top ten most influential albums in the 90's.

And Nickelback, barf, it is commercial butt rock at its worst. At least the 80's hair bands had some standards.
May 21, 2010 8:46am
derek bomar's avatar

derek bomar

Senior Member

3,722 posts
May 21, 2010 8:50 AM
ernest_t_bass wrote: Classless Bomar.
eh, it is what it is...
May 21, 2010 8:50am
Red_Skin_Pride's avatar

Red_Skin_Pride

Senior Member

1,226 posts
May 21, 2010 10:35 AM
Manhattan Buckeye wrote: "They didn't focus on making hit singles,"

Indeed, they didn't release any singles from In Utero, it is difficult to have a "hit" when you don't send singles to Top 40 stations. I think in some regards Cobain is held in too high of a regard, but it is unquestionable IMO that Nevermind and In Utero were two of the top ten most influential albums in the 90's.

And Nickelback, barf, it is commercial butt rock at its worst. At least the 80's hair bands had some standards.
I agree, I think many people ONLY like him because of his death, and it's easy to idolize people and put them up on too high a pedastal after their death.

However, I think for the most part a lot of what he, and Nirvana in turn, get is justified. They wrote almost all their own songs (about 80% being Cobain's stuff), obviously sang it and became as popular as they did, AND (a lot of ppl don't know this) Cobain drew still sketches of the music videos before they made them. In his private journals, that were released several years ago, there are sketches from Smells Like Teen Spirit, Come as you, Heart shaped box and 1 other one (Lithium maybe?). Anyways, he showed up to the set of the music video everytime the made videos, and they were shot exactly the way he had drawn them up.
May 21, 2010 10:35am
BigAppleBuckeye's avatar

BigAppleBuckeye

Senior Member

2,935 posts
May 21, 2010 10:49 AM
Red_Skin_Pride wrote:
Manhattan Buckeye wrote: "They didn't focus on making hit singles,"

Indeed, they didn't release any singles from In Utero, it is difficult to have a "hit" when you don't send singles to Top 40 stations. I think in some regards Cobain is held in too high of a regard, but it is unquestionable IMO that Nevermind and In Utero were two of the top ten most influential albums in the 90's.

And Nickelback, barf, it is commercial butt rock at its worst. At least the 80's hair bands had some standards.
I agree, I think many people ONLY like him because of his death, and it's easy to idolize people and put them up on too high a pedastal after their death.

However, I think for the most part a lot of what he, and Nirvana in turn, get is justified. They wrote almost all their own songs (about 80% being Cobain's stuff), obviously sang it and became as popular as they did, AND (a lot of ppl don't know this) Cobain drew still sketches of the music videos before they made them. In his private journals, that were released several years ago, there are sketches from Smells Like Teen Spirit, Come as you, Heart shaped box and 1 other one (Lithium maybe?). Anyways, he showed up to the set of the music video everytime the made videos, and they were shot exactly the way he had drawn them up.
Great stuff man, I never knew that, thanks for the post. Love Nirvana, as I have reiterated in multiple posts. RIP Kurt.
May 21, 2010 10:49am
said_aouita's avatar

said_aouita

Banned

8,532 posts
May 24, 2010 9:55 AM
I'd like to change my vote. Limp Bizkit is worse then Nickelback.
May 24, 2010 9:55am
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
May 24, 2010 1:50 PM
said_aouita wrote: I'd like to change my vote. Limp Bizkit is worse then Nickelback.
BALL WIT DA BALL!!!!!

Nope. Still not as bad as Nickelback.
May 24, 2010 1:50pm
derek bomar's avatar

derek bomar

Senior Member

3,722 posts
May 24, 2010 2:48 PM
I Wear Pants wrote:
said_aouita wrote: I'd like to change my vote. Limp Bizkit is worse then Nickelback.
BALL WIT DA BALL!!!!!

Nope. Still not as bad as Nickelback.
??? thats Kid Rock
May 24, 2010 2:48pm
I

I Wear Pants

Senior Member

16,223 posts
May 24, 2010 3:10 PM
derek bomar wrote:
I Wear Pants wrote:
said_aouita wrote: I'd like to change my vote. Limp Bizkit is worse then Nickelback.
BALL WIT DA BALL!!!!!

Nope. Still not as bad as Nickelback.
??? thats Kid Rock
Oh yeah, Bizkit was Nookie.

My bad.
May 24, 2010 3:10pm
j_crazy's avatar

j_crazy

7 gram rocks. how i roll.

8,372 posts
May 24, 2010 5:13 PM
the last 2 posts made me LOL.
May 24, 2010 5:13pm
newarkcatholicfan's avatar

newarkcatholicfan

Senior Member

3,199 posts
May 31, 2010 10:12 AM
No.
May 31, 2010 10:12am