posted by Trueblue23The Democrats offer no solution because it's their only real political ammo. If they're all so passionate about women's rights, why didn't Obama codify Roe v Wade and just be done with it all?
They should have, but it has also been, "the law of the land" for decades.
posted by kizer permanente
There are certainly legitimate arguments against Trump, but I am not sure this is the strongest argument, considering the fact this current administration has been a puppet regime for 4 years. Kamala and Walz will clearly continue to be a puppet regime for another 4 years.
Tim Walz really hates Elon Musk. He's apparently been calling him a dipshit and gay. I thought Trump was the homophobe 🤔🤷♀️
posted by kizer permanente
It may not sway anyone, but it is very telling and seems unprecedented. Those who know him best seem most apt to run the other way.
It still remains interesting to me just how many people will put up with, and suffer from, anything, as long as what they've always known continues unchanged.
posted by CenterBHSFanTim Walz really hates Elon Musk. He's apparently been calling him a dipshit and gay. I thought Trump was the homophobe 🤔🤷♀️
Do you have my posts blocked or something? I posted that Friday night. lol
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieIt may not sway anyone, but it is very telling and seems unprecedented. Those who know him best seem most apt to run the other way.
The picture is deceptive. From what I have read its something like 50/50 in total. Cabinet members are highly lobbied by special interests. Many are loyal to someone other than the president they serve.
posted by BR1986FBDo you have my posts blocked or something? I posted that Friday night. lol
No, I don't think it's possible to block anyone. Sorry, I just don't remember you posting that. My bad!
posted by majorsparkThe picture is deceptive. From what I have read its something like 50/50 in total. Cabinet members are highly lobbied by special interests. Many are loyal to someone other than the president they serve.
But it's very telling!!!!
posted by CenterBHSFanBut it's very telling!!!!
Looks like the first to get executed when he takes office.
posted by CenterBHSFanNo, I don't think it's possible to block anyone. Sorry, I just don't remember you posting that. My bad!
No worries. Just ribbing ya.
So in 2020, PA had a 1.1 million Democrat votes banked/lead before the election. So far, in 2024, they have 400k banked/lead by. That's a 700k deficit from 2020 (also realize COVID year). My question is do people think that all of those 700k will get out and vote tomorrow? I think Trump only lost PA by 80k votes.
posted by BR1986FBSo in 2020, PA had a 1.1 million Democrat votes banked/lead before the election. So far, in 2024, they have 400k banked/lead by. That's a 700k deficit from 2020 (also realize COVID year). My question is do people think that all of those 700k will get out and vote tomorrow? I think Trump only lost PA by 80k votes.
These types of posts just make no sense. There is no lead in an election. More votes have come via EV than in the past -- and more of those in 2024 are R vs in 2020. That could also mean R will have a much lower turnout tomorrow. Bottom line, I cannot stand the term "lead". And all the networks use it. Drives me insane. I also think Rs are going to be voting against Trumpe more than in the past.
posted by BR1986FBSo in 2020, PA had a 1.1 million Democrat votes banked/lead before the election. So far, in 2024, they have 400k banked/lead by. That's a 700k deficit from 2020 (also realize COVID year). My question is do people think that all of those 700k will get out and vote tomorrow? I think Trump only lost PA by 80k votes.
I think there is a certain amount of people that just won't vote because of a general apathy towards both candidates. They're probably not very political at all and aren't interested in a 3rd party or writing someone in. It's just easier to not vote.
posted by majorsparkThe picture is deceptive. From what I have read its something like 50/50 in total. Cabinet members are highly lobbied by special interests. Many are loyal to someone other than the president they serve.
Oh, only 50% of his cabinet won't be voting for him. Well that's pretty good then.
Fuck em. GW not endorsing the Republican nominee says all that needs to be said
posted by Devils AdvocateFuck em. GW not endorsing the Republican nominee says all that needs to be said
Yep - The Republicans have finally moved on from the warmongers like Bush and Cheney.
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieOh, only 50% of his cabinet won't be voting for him. Well that's pretty good then.
Did not say it was. Only that the picture was deceptive.
posted by Trueblue23Yep - The Republicans have finally moved on from the warmongers like Bush and Cheney.
Whatever happened to code pink?
posted by Devils AdvocateFuck em. GW not endorsing the Republican nominee says all that needs to be said
Who is sad about this? 😂
posted by CenterBHSFanWho is sad about this? 😂
Tulsi and RFK for Bush and the Cheneys is an all-time lopsided trade.
It's hilarious watching the left re-write those legacies in real time.
posted by Dr Winston O'BoogieOh, only 50% of his cabinet won't be voting for him. Well that's pretty good then.
How many of Kamala's 90% turnover ex employees do you think will vote for her?
posted by Trueblue23Tulsi and RFK for Bush and the Cheneys is an all-time lopsided trade.
It's hilarious watching the left re-write those legacies in real time.
Yeah. I think their focus is not to be principled or pragmatic, just to be never Trumper contrarians. Especially on this board! As we've seen in the past two pages of this thread.