Home▸Archive▸Pro Sports▸Cavs vs. Spurs 7:00 p.m.
fiver
Senior Member
F
138posts
F
fiver
Senior Member
138
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 9:41 AMMar 8, 2010 9:41 AM
Cavs enter this game at 49-15. Spurs come in at 36-24.
Mar 8, 2010 9:41am
pkebker
Senior Member
P
760posts
P
pkebker
Senior Member
760
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 10:06 AMMar 8, 2010 10:06 AM
Any word on whether LeBron is still scheduled to sit? I think the Spurs are not the right team to rest your star against. His ankle is probably worse than they let on...
Mar 8, 2010 10:06am
fiver
Senior Member
F
138posts
F
fiver
Senior Member
138
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 10:08 AMMar 8, 2010 10:08 AM
LeBron's status is still TBD according to nba.com
Mar 8, 2010 10:08am
Drums of War
Senior Member
D
356posts
D
Drums of War
Senior Member
356
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 10:16 AMMar 8, 2010 10:16 AM
Headed to the game tonight. I think they should give some sort of parting gift on nights LBJ does not play. I wonder if they have any snuggies left over?
Mar 8, 2010 10:16am
Pick6
A USA American
14,946posts
Pick6
A USA American
14,946
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 11:23 AMMar 8, 2010 11:23 AM
Even if he doesnt play Parker is out for the Spurs. So that helps the Cavs.
Mar 8, 2010 11:23am
krazie45
Senior Member
1,055posts
krazie45
Senior Member
1,055
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 11:31 AMMar 8, 2010 11:31 AM
Last I saw, LeBron was probable for this game
Mar 8, 2010 11:31am
j_crazy
7 gram rocks. how i roll.
8,372posts
j_crazy
7 gram rocks. how i roll.
8,372
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 12:01 PMMar 8, 2010 12:01 PM
on tv?
Mar 8, 2010 12:01pm
hangonsloopy
Senior Member
1,291posts
hangonsloopy
Senior Member
1,291
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 12:32 PMMar 8, 2010 12:32 PM
I'm going too. I hope he plays.
Mar 8, 2010 12:32pm
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977posts
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 12:56 PMMar 8, 2010 12:56 PM
IMO, this has something to do with the ankle--but not in the way most people are saying. I think he's fine to play, I believed Mike Brown when he said this was purely minutes. If LeBron sits these two games, he's got a week off--that's a nice luxury to have at this point in the season.
He may play tonight, Brown may not be able to keep him on the bench to play a quality team. But with a Laker loss, Brown may not let him go...we'll see. We can still beat the Spurs without him since Parker is out.
Mar 8, 2010 12:56pm
devil1197
Senior Member
D
6,220posts
D
devil1197
Senior Member
6,220
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 4:07 PMMar 8, 2010 4:07 PM
I wonder if Gibson will be available to play.
He didn't travel with the team due to pregnancy difficulties. Should be able to go since the game is in Cleveland.
Mar 8, 2010 4:07pm
Footwedge
Senior Member
F
9,265posts
F
Footwedge
Senior Member
9,265
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 5:04 PMMar 8, 2010 5:04 PM
What's wrong with Parker? And I don't think it helps our chances with Parker out...not when we are down so many players.
Mar 8, 2010 5:04pm
devil1197
Senior Member
D
6,220posts
D
devil1197
Senior Member
6,220
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 5:10 PMMar 8, 2010 5:10 PM
Footwedge wrote:
What's wrong with Parker? And I don't think it helps our chances with Parker out...not when we are down so many players.
Uhhh Tony Parker not Anthony Parker.
Mar 8, 2010 5:10pm
sportswizuhrd
Senior Member
S
3,215posts
S
sportswizuhrd
Senior Member
3,215
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 5:40 PMMar 8, 2010 5:40 PM
devil1197 wrote:
Footwedge wrote:
What's wrong with Parker? And I don't think it helps our chances with Parker out...not when we are down so many players.
Uhhh Tony Parker not Anthony Parker.
lol.
Mar 8, 2010 5:40pm
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977posts
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 5:40 PMMar 8, 2010 5:40 PM
LOL, yeah Tony. Obviously it wouldn't help our cause if Anthony Parker was out.
Mar 8, 2010 5:40pm
wes_mantooth
Tomfoolery & shenanigans
17,977posts
wes_mantooth
Tomfoolery & shenanigans
17,977
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 5:56 PMMar 8, 2010 5:56 PM
Tonight is gonna be the Antawn Jamison show....
Mar 8, 2010 5:56pm
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977posts
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 5:58 PMMar 8, 2010 5:58 PM
It potentially could be if LeBron doesn't play. They don't have a real good match up for him.
Mar 8, 2010 5:58pm
THE4RINGZ
R.I.P Thread Bomber
16,816posts
THE4RINGZ
R.I.P Thread Bomber
16,816
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 5:59 PMMar 8, 2010 5:59 PM
Big test for JJ Hickson tonight in the middle. But I have been impressed with him so far in this run without Shaq and Z.
Mar 8, 2010 5:59pm
devil1197
Senior Member
D
6,220posts
D
devil1197
Senior Member
6,220
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:00 PMMar 8, 2010 6:00 PM
wes_mantooth wrote:
Tonight is gonna be the Antawn Jamison show....
Is he related to Poon Tawn Jamison?
Mar 8, 2010 6:00pm
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977posts
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:01 PMMar 8, 2010 6:01 PM
THE4RINGZ wrote:
Big test for JJ Hickson tonight in the middle. But I have been impressed with him so far in this run without Shaq and Z.
Getting better and better. It's night and day from this year to last in terms of how comfortable he looks on the court.
Mar 8, 2010 6:01pm
THE4RINGZ
R.I.P Thread Bomber
16,816posts
THE4RINGZ
R.I.P Thread Bomber
16,816
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:02 PMMar 8, 2010 6:02 PM
I am just glad they didn't lose him in a deal right at the trading deadline.
Mar 8, 2010 6:02pm
devil1197
Senior Member
D
6,220posts
D
devil1197
Senior Member
6,220
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:02 PMMar 8, 2010 6:02 PM
LeBron is OUT
Mar 8, 2010 6:02pm
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977posts
SQ_Crazies
The Godfather
7,977
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:03 PMMar 8, 2010 6:03 PM
Me too. I didn't want to make a move that involved JJ. Thought we were good enough without making a move and I think JJ is a great player for the future core of this team. If they did it for Amare, I could have lived with it and I think it would have worked out but if they let him go for Jamison it would have been a bad long term choice.
Mar 8, 2010 6:03pm
THE4RINGZ
R.I.P Thread Bomber
16,816posts
THE4RINGZ
R.I.P Thread Bomber
16,816
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:08 PMMar 8, 2010 6:08 PM
What pissed me off the most was the talk on ESPN Cleveland radio about JJ as the deadline approached. It seemed to them that he was expendable because he wasn't a big part of the offense at that time. He has proven why the Cav's decided to keep him around. The best part about him is his youth.
Mar 8, 2010 6:08pm
devil1197
Senior Member
D
6,220posts
D
devil1197
Senior Member
6,220
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:22 PMMar 8, 2010 6:22 PM
The reason why Cleveland kept JJ around is so that they don't have an overhaul of old bigs.
While JJ is good, he needs to improve his one on one game. Its been evident since Shaq and LeBron have been out that JJ's offensive potential has gone down. He still needs that jumper but it will come in time. Picking up Jamison still gives JJ some minutes but also time to develop before being trusted to score in the playoffs.
Mar 8, 2010 6:22pm
Lovejoy1984
Senior Member
5,277posts
Lovejoy1984
Senior Member
5,277
posts
Mon, Mar 8, 2010 6:22 PMMar 8, 2010 6:22 PM
devil1197 wrote:
wes_mantooth wrote:
Tonight is gonna be the Antawn Jamison show....