Pariah wrote:
I love kids and would never want to hurt one in any form or fashion. Can't think of a situation where I ever have. Now, maybe that will allay the fear a little.
Okay... but when you post on a message board that very few people actually know you or anyone involved they have to read what you write... and what you WROTE is not "never want to hurt a kid" is was a parent, bullying a kid because he heard from others what he might have said...
from all the backpeddling that isn't what actually happened... good!
what was described in the first couple posts is wrong
what you probably did was fine and completely different (as has been described by you and others since)
tfloangel wrote:
you know, I do have one issue with the way Pariah has handled this situation...
It's pretty simple really.
In his initial post on this thread, he set himself up for scrutiny by wording - IMO merely with an attempt at humor - the situation in a way that set it up to sound like it had more malice than it did.
exactly... and the reader wasn't there so can only go on Pariah's words!
people aren't judging what HAPPENED... but what Pariah SAID happened and it appears he exaggerated...
tfloangel wrote: But the way some of you are talking, its like Pariah is the only one in any way in the wrong.
I don't think anyone said what the kid did was not wrong????
We are pointing out that what Pariah WROTE happened next (probably exaggerated) was even wrose than what the kid did... particuarly given what was writen...
The Pariah in the story:
1) assumed things he didn't know (said he HEARD the kid said this or that)
2) took it apon himself to bully a kid even after the situation was handled AND the kid had stopped
3) has an increadibly sexist attitude (boys can handle themselves but poor girls need daddy to protect them (even after she had handled it... daddy had to bully the kid))
That is almost certainly not the REAL "Pariah"... the person behind the screen name... but it was the one in the (fictional?) story!
tfloangel wrote: And for those who've suggested his daughter can't handle a little heckling, learn to take a joke. Because most of what he said - at the risk of putting words in Pariah's mouth - were about equal parts tongue-in-cheek and seriousness.
here's the thing... and a great lesson for everyone... people can't "read" tongue-in-cheek... we read what is written and have to take it for what it says! The situation described if VERY common... kids have a minor issue... parents OVERREACT and we have a big problem!
So while it may or may not be "tounge in cheek"... it DID bring up a very good point and a very BIG issue in High school athletics! (rathar Pariah's actual situation was that or not... rather he intended to or not.)
REMEMBER... internet threads have lives of their own! They don't always go just the way you planned!
You can't take it personal! Most people aren't responding to the PERSON... but the actions
described.
I've moderated a particular, busy, message board since the very early 1990s... almost all the "fights" and big blow ups that end up with somebody "banned" or action taken... start with somebody trying to use sarcasm... THEN getting mad when people don't GET the sarcasm and attack what is said as "real"... leading to hurt feelings and a sense of "us vs them"... sarcasm simply does not work in this setting...