O-Trap;1873967 wrote:Or ...

Originally Posted by HitsRus Absolute truth, and they should for the good of the game.

... they should do whatever the hell they want or think is best ...

... because it's their business, and they probably have more people looking into the most lucrative course of action than you do.

Ugh. I am not going to say that I "regret" reading your TLR post. It was mostly true and accurate, but is largely irrelevant to the point I have been trying to make.

The first statement of both of our latest posts is true...Businesses have the right to make decisions concerning their business and employee conduct. 1st amendment rights do not apply here. ( I assume you agree with that).

The second part of my statement is an opinion based on 35 years of business experience. This is a proper forum for opinions.
The second part of your statement is a speculation that is probably partially true in that the NFL has people looking in to this...but not because of any sense of it being "lucrative", but because it has become a public relations problem. I base my "opinion" of the second part of your statement on a general business precept that it is not "lucrative" to piss off even a small part of your customer base.....and it is pretty obvious, that for whatever reason, they have.

Let me continue to further explain my opinion why they made a mistake in handling this...from my business experience and general business precepts.
1) Never allow politics to enter the workplace unless it is directly related or affects your business AT LEAST indirectly. I would have thought this to be self obvious. I have two personal experiences that illustrate this...I won't TL/DR you with the details, but one involved political signage that I allowed on my property, and another just recently involving an employee being overheard by a client talking about her daughter attending a Trump rally. :O

2) When it comes to dealing with employees, if you give an inch, you can expect them to take a mile.
3) What you allow...will continue...and then becomes precedent...and then becomes an unwritten policy.

You are entirely correct in stating NFL owners can run their business how they see fit, but I am of the opinion that despite what they say or do at this point, they probably regret their original lack of action in this regard.

Laley23;1873965 wrote:Rodgers called for the entire stadium to link arms (they didn't, but a good number did). All players on both teams stood and linked arms.

Locking arms is hard to do when you have your hand over your heart as proper etiquette dictates. Of course, how many players and people in general know much about etiquette?

O-Trap;1873966 wrote:I regret reading this whole thread.

1. -
2. With all the complaints on why people take such issue with Antifa and the protesters who have blocked roadways, reasoning that they weren't peaceful or that they were obstructive, it baffles me that there's this much outrage over it.
   
   They've been peaceful.
   They've been still.
   They've been quiet.
   They've been unobstructive.
   They've put themselves in a position where people aren't ignoring them.
   
   That's about as good as it gets in terms of a protest. I mean, if you prefer that they protest a societal or widespread issue in a manner that doesn't upset your delicate sensibilities or force you to acknowledge it, then I'm not sure you know how protests work, but if that's the case, I'd encourage you to take this one as a win.

Probably because they are effectively aiming their protest at the flag (despite what they or their sympathizers say). If they are mad that a couple of potentially questionable police arrests resulted in injury to a black person, there are myriad ways of raising awareness with respect thereto, in peaceful manners, that would be specifically targeted at the issue they claim to be protesting, and result in a more effective protest. Instead, doing what they are doing is having the effect of furthering the divide, to the point no one wants to even discuss the real issue.

My guess is they know they screwed up, and they can fix it. Act like you want to be part of the U.S., and work within all the available pathways to effect the change you desire. The flag represents all the avenues at your disposal to protect your liberty; use it, don't piss on it.

superman;1873979 wrote:

You're really not very good at this, are you?

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/20858557/espn-survey-shows-americans-interested-divided-nfl-protests-national-anthem

QuakerOats;1873998 wrote:Locking arms is hard to do when you have your hand over your heart as proper etiquette dictates. Of course, how many players and people in general know much about etiquette?

So do you get mad about the giant flag on the field?

If the military is ok with that, then I am.

QuakerOats;1873998 wrote:Locking arms is hard to do when you have your hand over your heart as proper etiquette dictates. Of course, how many players and people in general know much about etiquette?

"The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery." Title 4, Chapter 1, Section 8

How often do you see white trash people wearing the flag?

O-Trap;1874014 wrote:You're really not very good at this, are you?

Yeah. Meme generator sucks. Or I suck. Either way.

Keep acting like Kaepernick is anything more than a piece of shit, Salto.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4934664/amp/Colin-Kaepernick-donated-25K-group-honoring-cop-killer.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Kaepernick is what we would call a "useful idiot".

Also, new video shows Michael Bennett was the lying piece of shit we all thought he was. Proof he wasn't racially profiled,AND he is trying to profit off of it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

gut;1874086 wrote:Kaepernick is what we would call a "useful idiot".

Oh yeah, he's essentially the (former) pro athlete version of the college kid with the Guevara t-shirt, just hopping from one rebel anti-authority cause to another to fight the power. He kinda comes off like more a social justice poseur than a SJW, really.

But, hey, we live in a world now where branding is EVERYTHING. He plays his cards right and he'll have more respect in certain circles (and possibly good speaking money and sales from the inevitable "What We Need To Do To Get Rid Of Hate" book) without getting his body broke in the NFL because he's THE GUY WHO WAS KICKED OUT OF FOOTBALL BECAUSE HE DID WHAT HE FELT WAS RIGHT!

iclfan2;1874084 wrote:Keep acting like Kaepernick is anything more than a piece of shit, Salto.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4934664/amp/Colin-Kaepernick-donated-25K-group-honoring-cop-killer.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You sound like some redneck who wears American flag bandana's.

We are talking about the National Anthem here, don't change the subject.

iclfan2;1874084 wrote:Keep acting like Kaepernick is anything more than a piece of shit, Salto.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4934664/amp/Colin-Kaepernick-donated-25K-group-honoring-cop-killer.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You sound like some redneck who wears American flag bandanas. We are talking about the National Anthem here, don't change the subject.

Said calling anyone a redneck or white trash.... [emoji23]

Here’s a thought .... stop using the Anthem and the flag as a vehicle/ venue for protest. Stop pissing on everything. When it comes to “disrespect”, intent matters. Etiquette violations are not disrespect.. that’s just well intended ignorance.

like_that;1874113 wrote:Said calling anyone a redneck or white trash.... [emoji23]

and? I have white trash tendencies, similar to how you have POS dago tendencies.


GFY

HitsRus;1874118 wrote:Here’s a thought .... stop using the Anthem and the flag as a vehicle/ venue for protest. Stop pissing on everything. When it comes to “disrespect”, intent matters. Etiquette violations are not disrespect.. that’s just well intended ignorance.

Perhaps a good middle ground is for the NFL to stop selling their patriotism for money, and get back to keeping the teams in the locker room until it's time to play. Nothing to protest here.

^^^ That’s one solution. Another would not to play the anthem at all, in defiance of tradition and surrender to the America haters. Or they could require their employees to stand “ in rememberance of those who sacrificed their lives in pursuit of the high ideals our nation strives for.”... but that would assume everyone is grateful, which clearly is not the case.

HitsRus;1874124 wrote:those who sacrificed their lives in pursuit of the high ideals our nation strives for.”...

Tell that to the cops.

QuakerOats;1874061 wrote:If the military is ok with that, then I am.

I'd love to hear your thoughts on the vets and military members who support these protests then.

said;1874119 wrote:and? I have white trash tendencies, similar to how you have POS dago tendencies.


GFY

I just find it funny a redneck loser calling others rednecks and white trash. Thanks for the lulz.

Heretic;1874104 wrote:Oh yeah, he's essentially the (former) pro athlete version of the college kid with the Guevara t-shirt, just hopping from one rebel anti-authority cause to another to fight the power. He kinda comes off like more a social justice poseur than a SJW, really.

To be fair, he gives a significant amount of his time and money to the cause. Safe to say he actually DOES a hell of a lot more than most of the guys taking a knee.

Oh look....the NBA.
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/20864858/nba-memo-reinforces-rule-players-coaches-stand-national-anthem


Gee...was that so hard?