gut;1855776 wrote:Or the "certainty" and alarmism isn't present in the actual research, if one were to actually read some of the research.

The entire global warming house of cards is built not on CO2, but on positive feedback that greatly amplify slight temperature increases from higher levels of CO2. Fair to say after 15-20 years that positive feedback theory has been debunked by the actual climate. But the global warming fascists still aren't quite ready to give up that charade.

gut;1855777 wrote:**were**....NY Times is literally worse than Breitbart now.

And you're a fool if you think that "breaking" email story wasn't a coordinated effort to try and clear the deck of Hillary's dirty laundry before the heart of campaign season. The old "here's evidence of a scandal, but it's not a scandal" ploy.....polar opposite to everything swirling Trump they're pushing "there's no evidence of a scandal, but it's a scandal"

sleeper;1855773 wrote:Right, everyone else is wrong, including all the top scientists across the world, and conservatives, in which a vast majority believe the world is only 6,000 years old is correct.

Delusional at best.

sleeper;1855778 wrote:And what conservative blog told you this? Where is your PhD in Climatology from?

jmog;1855782 wrote:...

1. Not all of the top scientists.

sleeper;1855779 wrote:Delusional.

If the NY Times and WaPo are so bad, why is Trump crying labeling the leaks to them as Fake News?.

sleeper;1855774 wrote:Keep defending conservatives and Trump, day in/day out, and pretend you are a Libertarian.

jmog;1855782 wrote:Two statements are incorrect here...

1. Not all of the top scientists.
2. The vast majority (not even a majority) of conservatives believe the world is only 6,000 years old.

You can't even get a whole sentence in without being wrong twice.

gut;1855783 wrote:I have a degree in statistics. That's literally all you need to know there's no justification for catastrophic warming, if you bother to actually read the research behind the sensational alarmist headlines. But in most cases they build models that don't work, and then make claims based on those flawed models.

LOL, when Chelsea Clinton links global warming to male misogyny then you KNOW it's all bullshit.

gut;1855786 wrote:Or it's just the case that the "leaks" from anonymous "sources" ARE the fake news. I keep telling you - stop getting your info second-hand from VOX and HuffPo.

Seriously. Try reading the actual articles instead of the headlines....often buried at the end of the story is a line or two that basically admits it's a speculative smear piece.

sleeper;1855792 wrote:Oh so no degree in Climatology but you know more than they do. Interesting.

I guess all the climatologists are just in on a grand conspiracy. I guess NASA is lying. Interesting. Where's your tin foil hat?

jmog;1855787 wrote:Science is good at one thing, explaining the current world/universe we live in and how it works.

Science can be used as a decent predictor of short term past and future events (I throw a baseball, I can predict within a given statistical probability where it will land, I can predict the next few days weather within a statistical probability, etc). It can do this with past events as well with things like carbon/radiometric dating and predict when civilizations existed/fell.

The farther away from our present you get in either the future or the past, the worse the accuracy that science can predict what did/will happen.

like_that;1855789 wrote:Nice deflection. So you pretty much admit you are a hypocritical fraud? Grow up.

like_that;1855790 wrote:I also recall a time sleeper called several posters useful idiots and now he can only repeat left leaning headlines and memes. Fraud sleeper drank the kool aid from his gf. SAD.

like_that;1855794 wrote:At resistancereport.com.

sleeper;1855796 wrote:The only fraud is in the WH and you continue to defend and support it. Enjoy!

sleeper;1855797 wrote:Well at this point we have people arguing the WaPo and NY Times are FAKE NEWs.

You can't win with the Fox News contingent.

like_that;1855799 wrote:I voted against him twice, you chose not to vote in the primary against him or for Bernie who would have beaten Trump, because you wanted to wash your hands of any responsibility. You're complicit, grow up and OWN IT.

like_that;1855800 wrote:Don't watch or read Fox News and I sure as hell don't read resitancereport.com LOL. Congrats on not being able to create your own arguments and researching your own data, but keep deflecting all logical arguments by crying about Fox News to posters who don't even follow fox. Sleeper the useful idiot. I never thought I would see it.

sleeper;1855802 wrote:Well I'm not a registered Democrat nor would I ever be and the candidate I support won the primaries. I voted for the best chance to keep Trump out of the White House and that was HRC.

But yes, whatever helps you sleep at night. Keep believing the government is the problem in everything and that Taxes are theft. This is classic Republican brainwashing and you bought it.

Welcome to the Fox News contingent!

sleeper;1855803 wrote:I don't read it either. I read all news sources and post when I think the analysis is interesting. Sorry it doesn't agree with your narrative. Keep telling yourself that Taxes are theft! So strong!

sleeper;1855792 wrote:Oh so no degree in Climatology but you know more than they do. Interesting.

I guess all the climatologists are just in on a grand conspiracy. I guess NASA is lying. Interesting. Where's your tin foil hat?