O
OhioStatePride2003
Posts: 686
Mar 14, 2010 5:07pm
Just read on Twitter where Quinn was traded to Denver for Peyton Hillis and 2 conditional draft picks.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 14, 2010 5:19pm
Fuck BOTH of you!september63 wrote:LOLpkebker wrote:FAILBR1986FB wrote: The meeting with Delhomme went "ok" and they talked general contract numbers. There's a 99.99% shot he will NOT be a Cleveland Brown.
Justin Fargas also left without a contract and Ben Watson has fallen off the face of the planet.
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Mar 14, 2010 5:38pm
BR needs to concentrate on his Browns and quit worrying about digging up dirt on the Steelers.
P
pkebker
Posts: 760
Mar 14, 2010 5:42pm
Both Wimbley and Quinn traded...They are really clearing house here.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 15, 2010 11:47am
Pot, meet kettle you fucking asshole. You spend more time on Browns' threads than you do Steelers. Mancrush much, you little bitch. I started the Roethilsberger rape thread because I was apparently the first one to see the news. Not my fault the Steelers fans weren't aware of what was going on in their own house.Al Capone wrote: BR needs to concentrate on his Browns and quit worrying about digging up dirt on the Steelers.
I'm sure that you're proud of the fact that you just may be the most hated poster on here and a few of us would like nothing more than to see your instigating ass gone.
On the Browns front, the team has expressed a "general interest" in San Diego WR Vincent Jackson. The pricetag of a 1st & 3rd is too steep but they may see if the Bolts are firm on that compensation so they can swing a deal.
D
Drums of War
Posts: 356
Mar 15, 2010 11:52am
^^^^^ What would you think the price tag would be? We have so many damn picks now we could maybe throw 2 3rds at them?
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 15, 2010 12:07pm
No idea but keep in mind they need a NT and we still have Shaun Rogers to dangle with draft picks.Drums of War wrote: ^^^^^ What would you think the price tag would be? We have so many damn picks now we could maybe throw 2 3rds at them?
OneBuckeye
Posts: 5,888
Mar 15, 2010 12:23pm
Don't let the trolls get to you BR, keep the goods coming.
Why would we have to give Rogers and draft picks? I would think that their value would be similar... I am surprised, unless we are talking about 6th and 7th round pick(s).
Why would we have to give Rogers and draft picks? I would think that their value would be similar... I am surprised, unless we are talking about 6th and 7th round pick(s).
P
pkebker
Posts: 760
Mar 15, 2010 12:25pm
A FA WR would be a good pick up...
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 15, 2010 12:28pm
The Bolts value Jackson at a 1st & 3rd. We'd probably get a 3rd, straight up (maybe a 2nd from a desperate team) for Rogers.OneBuckeye wrote: Don't let the trolls get to you BR, keep the goods coming.
Why would we have to give Rogers and draft picks? I would think that their value would be similar... I am surprised, unless we are talking about 6th and 7th round pick(s).
krazie45
Posts: 1,055
Mar 15, 2010 12:48pm
Why would we get rid of our best defensive player? You want to build a great defense you need Rogers. Jackson is a very good receiver but we just drafted 2 of those last year....I'd wait on a good unrestricted FA receiver.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 15, 2010 12:59pm
Rogers is expendable. The defense player better with a true NT, Ahtyba Rubin, manning the middle.krazie45 wrote: Why would we get rid of our best defensive player?
Rubin is a space eater who maintains gap integrity and stays home. Rogers likes to "guess/freelance" and shoot gaps leaving gaping holes for running backs to run through if he guesses wrong.
Rogers IS disruptive but is better suited to play DE, which I think he may if he's not dealt, than NT in a 3-4.
Plus Rogers is getting old and coming off a leg injury. Not easy to come back from, effectively, for a man who approaches 400 lbs in the offseason.
Non
Posts: 9,517
Mar 15, 2010 1:51pm
As stated before, deep draft for defensive line.
Browns would be able to replace Rogers with a young, talented player without question this year.
Browns would be able to replace Rogers with a young, talented player without question this year.
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Mar 15, 2010 4:19pm
Holmgren presser on STO now.
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Mar 15, 2010 6:59pm
So let me get this right. Basically the Browns get rid of 2 young never has been qbs for 2 over the hill never has been qbs. Sounds good to me. In the Walrus we trust.
From the Hills
Posts: 190
Mar 15, 2010 7:11pm
Hey Capone, this one is for you!!!!
krazie45
Posts: 1,055
Mar 15, 2010 7:14pm
Apparently Holmgren likes Bradford...
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Mar 15, 2010 7:22pm
Hey From the Hills.From the Hills wrote: Hey Capone, this one is for you!!!!
Pittsburgh- 6 rings
Cleveland-o rings
hahaha
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
Mar 15, 2010 7:27pm
That was new and original. Thank you.Al Capone wrote:Hey From the Hills.From the Hills wrote: Hey Capone, this one is for you!!!!
Pittsburgh- 6 rings
Cleveland-o rings
hahaha
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Mar 15, 2010 7:49pm
I was in the bleachers that day. One of my all time favorite plays. Watching Bradshaw spasm on the ground for 5 minutes was also pretty cool.From the Hills wrote: Hey Capone, this one is for you!!!!
I still don't know why a flag was thrown. Back then, pretty much everything was a go.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 15, 2010 8:36pm
We're gonna get a lot of this smoke & mirrors stuff before the draft. Always subject to change but if he's healthy, Bradford would be my pick right now.krazie45 wrote: Apparently Holmgren likes Bradford...
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Mar 15, 2010 8:40pm
Bradford wouldn't last 3 weeks in the AFC NORTH.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Mar 15, 2010 8:42pm
And Ben the Penetrator may not play ANOTHER game.Al Capone wrote: Bradford wouldn't last 3 weeks in the AFC NORTH.
A
Al Capone
Posts: 1,727
Mar 15, 2010 8:45pm
Oh Well.
Writerbuckeye
Posts: 4,745
Mar 15, 2010 8:47pm
I'm calling BS on this report. I believe this is a huge smokescreen.BR1986FB wrote:We're gonna get a lot of this smoke & mirrors stuff before the draft. Always subject to change but if he's healthy, Bradford would be my pick right now.krazie45 wrote: Apparently Holmgren likes Bradford...
McCoy will be the pick, probably in the second round.