OneBuckeye wrote:
DaBrowns41 wrote:
You do know that I was quoting OneBuckeye... right?
Thanks for calling me an asshole, though. Real classy.
In regards to your response, I think you ignorantly judged brady in your reposnse when you said he hasn't proved he deserved to be a first rounder. I don't think the ship has sailed completely on Brady, but bringing in a first round pick with all the hoopla is going to be the same thing that happend when we drafted brady, and I think Bradford is not worthy of a first round pick, and to have expectations of him (or any QB) to come in a perform like a Joe Flacco or a Matt Ryan right off the bat is nuts. Thanks for supporting my point.
The flaw in the thinking on guys like Flacco are that they fell into the perfect storm. Ryan was an exception.
Flacco and Roethlisberger came into situations where they had outstanding running games and shutdown defenses. They were only asked to throw the ball 15-18 times per game..."game managers" if you will. You put Roethlisberger (who is no longer a game manager) or Flacco on teams like the Lions, Browns, Rams, etc and they are nowhere NEAR as effective. They walked into ideal situations where they really didn't have to go through too many growing pains.
A QB like Bradford, Clausen, etc would likely sit for a year behind a veteran until the pieces were in place. This is where they screwed up with Tim Couch. They did it ass backwards. The got the QB and WR's before they got the O-Line and running backs.