se-alum;1684182 wrote:Honestly, I think Pettine has played it well, had he started Manziel and lost yesterday, there would have been way more people questioning him than did when he named Hoyer the starter. Hoyer's performance now makes it easy for Pettine to start Manziel and being questioned very little about it.
Also, Pettine made the point that you don't change QB's when your team is winning.
If he's making decisions based on whether "people would be questioning him" and not on what is necessary for the team to win a crucial game, then he is a terrible coach....so that is not "playing it well".
I've commented earlier on that point about
"don't change QBs when your team is winning".
That is, at best, a GUIDELINE....not a rule to be followed blindly. Anyone who would follow that as a hard fast rule at the expense of his team's winning is a fool. What happened to a package of plays that JFF was supposed to have? He could have run Manziel out there once ,twice, three times during that game without REALLY changing QBs, if for no other reason than to keep Indy guessing a bit and getting them back on their heals. Instead he did Indy a favor, and let one of the league's
worst defenses settle in and stifle one of the most unoriginal, unimaginative game plans that could have been devised. How many times do you have to watch multiple drives that went nowhere and come to the conclusion that something else needed to be done? The bottom line is that he lost that game because his QB was totally ineffective and he refused to use available options that might have prevented that.