F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Feb 15, 2014 2:43pm
Like it or not the Browns are going to have to trade up to get Manziel. And if they don't do it, they are making yet another horrible mistake. Only an idiot doesn't understand that Manziel is head and shoulders above the B & B boys.
Does management really want to win? Or do they want the same old shit again?
Does management really want to win? Or do they want the same old shit again?
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Feb 15, 2014 8:47pm
lolFootwedge;1581069 wrote:Like it or not the Browns are going to have to trade up to get Manziel. And if they don't do it, they are making yet another horrible mistake. Only an idiot doesn't understand that Manziel is head and shoulders above the B & B boys.
Does management really want to win? Or do they want the same old shit again?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ce13/6ce13e1c4b0630ad6bbe5d5338d2afaf0b74f11d" alt="se-alum's avatar"
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Feb 15, 2014 9:57pm
Gonna guess this is some sort of joke?Footwedge;1581069 wrote:Like it or not the Browns are going to have to trade up to get Manziel. And if they don't do it, they are making yet another horrible mistake. Only an idiot doesn't understand that Manziel is head and shoulders above the B & B boys.
Does management really want to win? Or do they want the same old shit again?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bce86/bce863ad5bd6949a54b80d6ca3a9213fd6a43c44" alt="Midstate01's avatar"
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Feb 15, 2014 11:08pm
I want Teddy, but I'll be thrilled if JFF is there at 4. If both are gone, then go WR or bpa. I want NOTHING to do with bortles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ce13/6ce13e1c4b0630ad6bbe5d5338d2afaf0b74f11d" alt="se-alum's avatar"
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Feb 15, 2014 11:49pm
Just curious, why not Bortles?Midstate01;1581248 wrote:I want Teddy, but I'll be thrilled if JFF is there at 4. If both are gone, then go WR or bpa. I want NOTHING to do with bortles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bce86/bce863ad5bd6949a54b80d6ca3a9213fd6a43c44" alt="Midstate01's avatar"
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Feb 16, 2014 12:16am
Doesn't have the arm strength I don't think. Has size. Doesn't move all that well, though OK. I just don't see it I actually like carr more than bortles. He seems like the every year fly up the board qb.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 16, 2014 2:27am
This is just insanity.Midstate01;1581259 wrote:Doesn't have the arm strength I don't think. Has size. Doesn't move all that well, though OK. I just don't see it I actually like carr more than bortles. He seems like the every year fly up the board qb.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Feb 16, 2014 4:03am
Which part? His arm strength is average. I'm not high on Bortles. Granted, I don't want Carr, but I think Bortles is well behind Bridgewater and ManzielSportsAndLady;1581264 wrote:This is just insanity.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000301149/article/film-room-ucfs-fastrising-blake-bortles-not-elite-qb
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ce13/6ce13e1c4b0630ad6bbe5d5338d2afaf0b74f11d" alt="se-alum's avatar"
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Feb 16, 2014 9:55am
Bortles moves very well for his size. Had around 100 yards against Baylor running read option, and Kiper calls his arm strength above average.Midstate01;1581259 wrote:Doesn't have the arm strength I don't think. Has size. Doesn't move all that well, though OK. I just don't see it I actually like carr more than bortles. He seems like the every year fly up the board qb.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Feb 16, 2014 11:29am
Scouts, Inc. has it as averagese-alum;1581296 wrote:Kiper calls his arm strength above average.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16249/16249f60aa921da4a6ac2e3700c05a774ec028ca" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ce13/6ce13e1c4b0630ad6bbe5d5338d2afaf0b74f11d" alt="se-alum's avatar"
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Feb 16, 2014 11:40am
Average can win games and set NFL passing records.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 16, 2014 12:14pm
I like how Bortles is solid under pressure, and he goes through his reads. I have said before though, I am ok with any of the three QBs. Each have their flaws, but most of them can be fixed imo.
Also, footwedge per usual is a dipshit.
Also, footwedge per usual is a dipshit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 16, 2014 1:32pm
I drunkenly read his post thinking it said he likes Carr over bortles. Lollhslep134;1581265 wrote:Which part? His arm strength is average. I'm not high on Bortles. Granted, I don't want Carr, but I think Bortles is well behind Bridgewater and Manziel
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000301149/article/film-room-ucfs-fastrising-blake-bortles-not-elite-qb
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Feb 16, 2014 2:39pm
He did say that lolSportsAndLady;1581337 wrote:I drunkenly read his post thinking it said he likes Carr over bortles. Lol
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bce86/bce863ad5bd6949a54b80d6ca3a9213fd6a43c44" alt="Midstate01's avatar"
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Feb 16, 2014 3:36pm
He's still drunjlhslep134;1581350 wrote:He did say that lol
I don't really like carr.. but I don't like bortles either. I'm all for being wrong though...sooo
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Feb 16, 2014 5:17pm
Yeah I don't really like either, but I'm significantly higher on them than I was on Weeden so I guess I'm OK with them.Midstate01;1581368 wrote:He's still drunj
I don't really like carr.. but I don't like bortles either. I'm all for being wrong though...sooo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 17, 2014 9:59am
Four mocks in one. I like all the first picks, but not a fan of the 2nd picks. I like hyde, but want nothing to do with him in the first round. Plenty of RB talent. I also don't think we need to reach out for a WR in the first round. I have a feeling we address our #2 WR in FA.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2014/mock-drafts?campaign=Facebook_mockdrafts
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2014/mock-drafts?campaign=Facebook_mockdrafts
J
jmog
Posts: 6,567
Feb 17, 2014 12:46pm
Same, I like the #4s but don't like the 2nd 1st round picks. I am a huge OSU fan, and if Hyde is there in round 2, fine. But the way the NFL is now, no way do I use a 1st round pick on a RB, unless it is so freaking obvious he is the next Tomlinson.like_that;1581576 wrote:Four mocks in one. I like all the first picks, but not a fan of the 2nd picks. I like hyde, but want nothing to do with him in the first round. Plenty of RB talent. I also don't think we need to reach out for a WR in the first round. I have a feeling we address our #2 WR in FA.
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2014/mock-drafts?campaign=Facebook_mockdrafts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ce13/6ce13e1c4b0630ad6bbe5d5338d2afaf0b74f11d" alt="se-alum's avatar"
se-alum
Posts: 13,948
Feb 17, 2014 1:19pm
Good to hear Browns are working on a deal with Mack. Would love to see him locked up, and then take Yankey with the 2nd pick.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdd58/bdd58d85797e0a3c6dc786c956196d5cb593189f" alt="shook_17's avatar"
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Feb 17, 2014 1:47pm
se-alum;1581648 wrote:Good to hear Browns are working on a deal with Mack. Would love to see him locked up, and then take Yankey with the 2nd pick.
Are they really? Thats awesome news. I didn't understand banner and lombardi to create more holes on this team and would let Mack and Ward walk without making offers. This team is close. I don't give a shit what they say about 3 or 4 years, the media that is, we are a QB oline men, WR, and a few defensive pieces away. If we hit on a few players in FA this team could seriously compete.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdd58/bdd58d85797e0a3c6dc786c956196d5cb593189f" alt="shook_17's avatar"
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Feb 17, 2014 1:52pm
@ Rotoworld_FB Report: # Rams not looking to extend Sam Bradford http://dlvr.it/4xyzjR
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 2hSerious Q for # Browns fans: Would you give up a 3rd-round pick for Sam Bradford?
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 2h
I think # Browns & Bradford is worth exploring because Mike Shanahan was known to have great affinity for Sam. Kyle now Cleveland OC.
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 2h
RT @ CardenGary Not a serious question; Rams would never trade Sam for a 3rd ... Bc he's so awesome or bc his contract is so team friendly?
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 11m
Billy Devaney on # Rams not extending Bradford: "I think they want to sit back & see what type of year Sam has before making that commitment"
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 9m
And that sounds very reasonable, until you consider Sam Bradford's salary is non-gtd $14.02M with $17.6M cap number. A Salary Cap Albatross.
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 1m
Very fact # Rams wont extend Bradford confirms they have internal doubt. Yet theyll pay him a $14+M salary for '14? Something doesnt line up.
I know they wouldn't let him go for a 3rd rounder. But if the Browns dangled our 26th overall pick in front of the Rams. Any interest? I know I would be. I always like Bradford, just wish he could stay healthy.
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 2hSerious Q for # Browns fans: Would you give up a 3rd-round pick for Sam Bradford?
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 2h
I think # Browns & Bradford is worth exploring because Mike Shanahan was known to have great affinity for Sam. Kyle now Cleveland OC.
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 2h
RT @ CardenGary Not a serious question; Rams would never trade Sam for a 3rd ... Bc he's so awesome or bc his contract is so team friendly?
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 11m
Billy Devaney on # Rams not extending Bradford: "I think they want to sit back & see what type of year Sam has before making that commitment"
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 9m
And that sounds very reasonable, until you consider Sam Bradford's salary is non-gtd $14.02M with $17.6M cap number. A Salary Cap Albatross.
Evan Silva ‏ @ evansilva 1m
Very fact # Rams wont extend Bradford confirms they have internal doubt. Yet theyll pay him a $14+M salary for '14? Something doesnt line up.
I know they wouldn't let him go for a 3rd rounder. But if the Browns dangled our 26th overall pick in front of the Rams. Any interest? I know I would be. I always like Bradford, just wish he could stay healthy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Feb 17, 2014 2:00pm
No thanks on Bradford.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Feb 17, 2014 2:18pm
No thanks on bradford as well. I hope this doesnt mean the Rams plan to draft a QB with the 2nd pick.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/410a9/410a978581792d9f8b313336ad9405fb930b44ab" alt="DeyDurkie5's avatar"
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Feb 17, 2014 2:21pm
No way. Draft a qb in the first. Draft a qb in the later rounds. Then let them go against hoyer. Sam fucking Bradford is not the answer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e97/79e97f67f2e42e4eb5ba600a0136c83d75ee8c0a" alt="Commander of Awesome's avatar"
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Feb 17, 2014 2:23pm
If rams take a QB, we could be sitting there with no QB worth making a pick for. I'd imagine it'd go TBW, Bortles and Manziel as top 3 QBs taken. Leaving us with Carr/Mettenberger to chose between. No thanks.
At that point I'm taking Clowney/Barr/Mack/Robinson
At that point I'm taking Clowney/Barr/Mack/Robinson