2014 Cleveland Browns Offseason Thread

Pro Sports 6,508 replies 174,832 views
Lovejoy1984's avatar
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 8, 2014 8:21pm
Bills take Watkins.
lhslep134's avatar
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
May 8, 2014 8:22pm
Yes! I'm so happy we traded down.
Lovejoy1984's avatar
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 8, 2014 8:22pm
Great move by Cleveland moving back wonder what they got.
Crimson streak's avatar
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
May 8, 2014 8:22pm
I think we go Gilbert or denard now
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 8, 2014 8:22pm
so dumb
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
May 8, 2014 8:22pm
Huh, we'll see how this shakes out...
like_that's avatar
like_that
Posts: 26,625
May 8, 2014 8:23pm
Here is to the bills going 0-16.
Crimson streak's avatar
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
May 8, 2014 8:23pm
rydawg5;1614057 wrote:so dumb
How is that dumb? Got a 1st rounder next year for dropping 5 spots in a loaded draft. That's a great move
shook_17's avatar
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
May 8, 2014 8:24pm
LOVE THAT trade. next years first.
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 8, 2014 8:24pm
Crimson streak;1614061 wrote:How is that dumb? Got a 1st rounder next year for dropping 5 spots in a loaded draft. That's a great move
Because have you seen our first round draft picks in the last 15 years? You had a guy who is going to be awesome, you pass on him so you can get a bust.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 8, 2014 8:24pm
like_that;1614060 wrote:Here is to the bills going 0-16.
They don't have a QB, they could very well be picking in the top 10 again next year.

A WR isn't going to instantly make your team better in the wins department.
Mulva's avatar
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
May 8, 2014 8:24pm
like_that;1614060 wrote:Here is to the bills going 0-16.
I'll drink to that.
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
May 8, 2014 8:25pm
I am done with the Browns. But I will say to Sports and Lady...you were right about Bortles...and I was wrong. You could have had my 500 clams. I apologize. You can still GFY LOL. Ray Farmer==idiot.
IggyPride00's avatar
IggyPride00
Posts: 6,482
May 8, 2014 8:25pm
Crimson streak;1614061 wrote:How is that dumb? Got a 1st rounder next year for dropping 5 spots in a loaded draft. That's a great move
We moved down to get a lesser player and nothing else to help us this year.

I am so fucking sick of the 5 year plan where we always punt til next year.

Same shit Banner/Lombardi did because future picks are always more important than winning now.
Lovejoy1984's avatar
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 8, 2014 8:26pm
Raiders will be interesting with their pick.
Crimson streak's avatar
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
May 8, 2014 8:27pm
rydawg5;1614064 wrote:Because have you seen our first round draft picks in the last 15 years? You had a guy who is going to be awesome, you pass on him so you can get a bust.
Or they didn't see a difference In the guys left compared to what's left at 9. We got another first rounder for 5 spots. Thats a trade rape
lhslep134's avatar
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
May 8, 2014 8:27pm
IQQY SHUT THE F*CK UP
Lovejoy1984's avatar
Lovejoy1984
Posts: 5,277
May 8, 2014 8:28pm
Mack, was pretty obvious for anyone but the Raiders, as you never really know with them.
Crimson streak's avatar
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
May 8, 2014 8:28pm
IggyPride00;1614068 wrote:We moved down to get a lesser player and nothing else to help us this year.

I am so fucking sick of the 5 year plan where we always punt til next year.

Same shit Banner/Lombardi did because future picks are always more important than winning now.
Stfu. You are still getting an impact player at 9. Taking denard or Gilbert at 9 is getting a huge impact player. Hell Jff could be there at 9 too
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 8, 2014 8:28pm
Crimson streak;1614070 wrote:Or they didn't see a difference In the guys left compared to what's left at 9. We got another first rounder for 5 spots. Thats a trade rape
Just because "they" didn't see a difference doesn't mean there is a huge fucking difference.
SportsAndLady's avatar
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
May 8, 2014 8:29pm
rydawg5;1614064 wrote:Because have you seen our first round draft picks in the last 15 years? You had a guy who is going to be awesome, you pass on him so you can get a bust.
Lol. We haven't even taken anyone yet and you're calling him (or her, I guess..?) a bust?
Crimson streak's avatar
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
May 8, 2014 8:29pm
Mathews will be off the board here to Atlanta
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 8, 2014 8:29pm
Ya'll the same mother fuckers getting on me about Colt Mccoy sucking his first year, and when I called it out, everyone freaked the fuck out. Take off your dawg pound glasses. We are fucking superhuman at shitting a draft.
R
rydawg5
Posts: 2,639
May 8, 2014 8:30pm
SportsAndLady;1614075 wrote:Lol. We haven't even taken anyone yet and you're calling him (or her, I guess..?) a bust?
Your reading comprehension skills are improving. You like like make a cool 43k salary now?
Crimson streak's avatar
Crimson streak
Posts: 9,002
May 8, 2014 8:31pm
rydawg5;1614074 wrote:Just because "they" didn't see a difference doesn't mean there is a huge fucking difference.
Just stop talking. We don't have a need for Watkins or Mack. Neither of them will impact the team as much as denard or Gilbert would do. Mike Evans May be available at 9 too. There isn't a different between 4 and 9 in this draft