K
ksig489
Posts: 943
Aug 9, 2013 10:23pm
So Ohio fans never talk about the past? They have never mentioned a previous season?
By the way...look at your signature line...it starts with a reference to the past.
And quoting last years score is a reference to the past.
Idiot
By the way...look at your signature line...it starts with a reference to the past.
And quoting last years score is a reference to the past.
Idiot
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bce86/bce863ad5bd6949a54b80d6ca3a9213fd6a43c44" alt="Midstate01's avatar"
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Aug 9, 2013 10:35pm
ksig489;1484855 wrote:So Ohio fans never talk about the past? They have never mentioned a previous season?
By the way...look at your signature line...it starts with a reference to the past.
And quoting last years score is a reference to the past.
Idiot
Ohio fans are too drunk on court street to remember the past. But they don't have much of a football history.
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Aug 9, 2013 10:36pm
The whole series record between OSU and Michigan is so stupid considering Michigan went 19-3 between 1897-1927. I mean seriously, how stupid is that? Does anyone really give a shit about the first 22 games? Wouldn't Michigan fans trade all the first 13 wins in leather helmets for one win in the rivalry in 2013? It is sad that Michigan fans hold so much pride in the dumbass series record.
And the fact that a club win in 1897 holds the same weight as a win in 2012 is sad. Really. It's sad.
We have Urban, you have Hoke. Sorry.
And the fact that a club win in 1897 holds the same weight as a win in 2012 is sad. Really. It's sad.
We have Urban, you have Hoke. Sorry.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Aug 9, 2013 10:50pm
Hahahahahahaha.dat dude;1484867 wrote:The whole series record between OSU and Michigan is so stupid considering Michigan went 19-3 between 1897-1927. I mean seriously, how stupid is that? Does anyone really give a shit about the first 22 games? Wouldn't Michigan fans trade all the first 13 wins in leather helmets for one win in the rivalry in 2013? It is sad that Michigan fans hold so much pride in the dumbass series record.
And the fact that a club win in 1897 holds the same weight as a win in 2012 is sad. Really. It's sad.
We have Urban, you have Hoke. Sorry.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/984ae/984ae5d8f9c1b63331902291e955b69ad8eefd60" alt="GoChiefs's avatar"
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Aug 9, 2013 10:51pm
dat dude;1484867 wrote:The whole series record between OSU and Michigan is so stupid considering Michigan went 19-3 between 1897-1927. I mean seriously, how stupid is that? Does anyone really give a shit about the first 22 games? Wouldn't Michigan fans trade all the first 13 wins in leather helmets for one win in the rivalry in 2013? It is sad that Michigan fans hold so much pride in the dumbass series record.
And the fact that a club win in 1897 holds the same weight as a win in 2012 is sad. Really. It's sad.
We have Urban, you have Hoke. Sorry.
If OSU was leading the series, their fans would be bringing it up too. Nice try.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Aug 9, 2013 10:57pm
dat dude;1484867 wrote:The whole series record between OSU and Michigan is so stupid considering Michigan went 19-3 between 1897-1927. I mean seriously, how stupid is that? Does anyone really give a shit about the first 22 games? Wouldn't Michigan fans trade all the first 13 wins in leather helmets for one win in the rivalry in 2013? It is sad that Michigan fans hold so much pride in the dumbass series record.
And the fact that a club win in 1897 holds the same weight as a win in 2012 is sad. Really. It's sad.
We have Urban, you have Hoke. Sorry.
+1 would read again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37dae/37daef33348f4bc9a2c75a18d2929621d031b7b2" alt="mcburg93's avatar"
mcburg93
Posts: 3,167
Aug 9, 2013 11:02pm
You are right about that. I only weight the win losses from the time I was born till now. So they are tied with 19 wins each and one tie. I am hoping that this year the bucks will have the upper hand.GoChiefs;1484872 wrote:If OSU was leading the series, their fans would be bringing it up too. Nice try.
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Aug 9, 2013 11:07pm
Honest question: Do you think a win in 2013 is equal to a win in 1897?WebFire;1484871 wrote:Hahahahahahaha.
D
dat dude
Posts: 1,564
Aug 9, 2013 11:13pm
No, I wouldn't. It's ridiculous. OSU was a club team, a fucking club team until 1900. When OSU lost to Michgian in 1902 by the score of 86-0 (86-0!!!), they also lost to Case Western 23-12. Yet, it the eyes of Michigan fans, that win is equal to a win in 2011. That is ridiculous. Any reasonable person can see that.GoChiefs;1484872 wrote:If OSU was leading the series, their fans would be bringing it up too. Nice try.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bce86/bce863ad5bd6949a54b80d6ca3a9213fd6a43c44" alt="Midstate01's avatar"
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Aug 9, 2013 11:14pm
When I go to my buddies house, there is a michigan fan who is a pretty nice guy but hes pretty dumb. We start talking osu/michigan and he always brings up that UM has more titles then osu and I always say pre 1950s and he goes crazy. Says he has pride in those teams. Im like you moron your parents weren't even alive. I like the since you were born theory. Not sure what it is since 82. Id guess michigan leads. Thats the only thing id care about. But whatever. Its what makes the rivalry fun.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Aug 9, 2013 11:29pm
Don't even lie. If the series was flipped, you'd all have it as your sigs and throw it in our face every chance you got. Hahahahahahaha.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Aug 9, 2013 11:31pm
Is a win in 2013 equal to a win in 1981?dat dude;1484879 wrote:Honest question: Do you think a win in 2013 is equal to a win in 1897?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bce86/bce863ad5bd6949a54b80d6ca3a9213fd6a43c44" alt="Midstate01's avatar"
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Aug 9, 2013 11:34pm
I dont even claim the titles in the 70s. I wasn't alive. In my lifetime they have one outright title and the most bcs wins. And luckily the painful cooper years I was young enough to just let it go...im way too involved now for a losing streak like that. It'd be brutal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Aug 9, 2013 11:35pm
WebFire;1484887 wrote:Don't even lie. If the series was flipped, you'd all have it as your sigs and throw it in our face every chance you got. Hahahahahahaha.
You're pathetjc
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37dae/37daef33348f4bc9a2c75a18d2929621d031b7b2" alt="mcburg93's avatar"
mcburg93
Posts: 3,167
Aug 9, 2013 11:39pm
Hell yea we would lol. I hate Michigan and I am a firm believer Michigan was paying John cooper too.WebFire;1484887 wrote:Don't even lie. If the series was flipped, you'd all have it as your sigs and throw it in our face every chance you got. Hahahahahahaha.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/984ae/984ae5d8f9c1b63331902291e955b69ad8eefd60" alt="GoChiefs's avatar"
GoChiefs
Posts: 16,754
Aug 10, 2013 12:02am
SportsAndLady;1484893 wrote:You're pathetjc
Being pathetjc is the worst.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37dae/37daef33348f4bc9a2c75a18d2929621d031b7b2" alt="mcburg93's avatar"
mcburg93
Posts: 3,167
Aug 10, 2013 12:29am
Reps even though it pains me.GoChiefs;1484901 wrote:Being pathetjc is the worst.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Aug 10, 2013 6:59am
That's your response because you know it's true.SportsAndLady;1484893 wrote:You're pathetjc
V
vball10set
Posts: 24,795
Aug 10, 2013 7:03am
See post below...idiotksig489;1484855 wrote:So Ohio fans never talk about the past? They have never mentioned a previous season?
By the way...look at your signature line...it starts with a reference to the past.
And quoting last years score is a reference to the past.
Idiot
Midstate01;1484865 wrote:Ohio fans are too drunk on court street to remember the past. But they don't have much of a football history.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cca2a/cca2aaf9c508df53793357e7b6913b3d72be1e6b" alt="#1DBag's avatar"
#1DBag
Posts: 786
Aug 11, 2013 11:01pm
[video=youtube_share;gzzi4GUW6UM][/video]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/241f9/241f9d4fe5410d9a5e43866e5e348cd864e54220" alt="Classyposter58's avatar"
Classyposter58
Posts: 6,321
Aug 11, 2013 11:34pm
I like to call that Massillon Syndrome, going around toting multiple championships in an extremely archaic format. I would say everything after WWII has a little validity as college football had became established nationwide by thenMidstate01;1484883 wrote:When I go to my buddies house, there is a michigan fan who is a pretty nice guy but hes pretty dumb. We start talking osu/michigan and he always brings up that UM has more titles then osu and I always say pre 1950s and he goes crazy. Says he has pride in those teams. Im like you moron your parents weren't even alive. I like the since you were born theory. Not sure what it is since 82. Id guess michigan leads. Thats the only thing id care about. But whatever. Its what makes the rivalry fun.
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Aug 12, 2013 9:54pm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fed36/fed364d05d13df6b080d1edd4c87b566de3b66b6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Aug 13, 2013 12:26am
^Look at that tiny dick bulge
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bce86/bce863ad5bd6949a54b80d6ca3a9213fd6a43c44" alt="Midstate01's avatar"
Midstate01
Posts: 14,766
Aug 13, 2013 1:34am
WebFire;1486058 wrote:
Thats crazy how much weight hes put on. He looks so much different
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Aug 13, 2013 8:26am
You would.SportsAndLady;1486105 wrote:^Look at that tiny dick bulge