ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jun 10, 2014 9:53pm
Have made it 7 (week)days so far (of summer vaycay) of running at least a mile per day. As soon as school hits, I plan to heavy lift.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jun 11, 2014 7:55am
Not familiar with the one you have but the Magic Bullet's motor isn't all that strong.Automatik;1624734 wrote: I'm not sure about the "Magicbullet" though, mine has more powerful motor.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jun 18, 2014 3:41pm
T
thavoice
Posts: 14,376
Jun 18, 2014 5:21pm
Do you subscribe to what is in that link?BR1986FB;1627557 wrote:Interesting read.....
http://www.caloriegate.com/calories-in-calories-out/11-experts-demolish-the-calories-in-calories-out-cico-model-of-obesity
S
Sonofanump
Jun 18, 2014 7:06pm
Obviously.BR1986FB;1627557 wrote:Interesting read.....
http://www.caloriegate.com/calories-in-calories-out/11-experts-demolish-the-calories-in-calories-out-cico-model-of-obesity
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jun 19, 2014 7:46am
Most of it. Calories in, calories out is much too simplistic a concept. Too many variables that can throw things off kilter.thavoice;1627578 wrote:Do you subscribe to what is in that link?
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jun 19, 2014 8:27am
It's also the base goal for most diets and workouts to lose weight. Sure there are variables, but in general it works.BR1986FB;1627707 wrote:Most of it. Calories in, calories out is much too simplistic a concept. Too many variables that can throw things off kilter.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jun 19, 2014 8:57am
Legit!
[video=youtube;Wd8tZiHexPc][/video]
[video=youtube;Wd8tZiHexPc][/video]
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jun 23, 2014 1:23pm
Tim McGraw doin' work.....
http://www.examiner.com/article/tim-mcgraw-credits-low-carb-paleo-diet-and-crossfit-for-40-lb-weight-loss
http://www.examiner.com/article/tim-mcgraw-credits-low-carb-paleo-diet-and-crossfit-for-40-lb-weight-loss
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jun 24, 2014 8:12pm
I just got a copy of UD 2.0 from a friend. I may give it a go in a few weeks. Heard of it?
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/ultimate-diet-20
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/ultimate-diet-20
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jun 25, 2014 7:47am
Very familiar with Lyle McDonald. Let me know how this goes. It might be worth investing in.Automatik;1629554 wrote:I just got a copy of UD 2.0 from a friend. I may give it a go in a few weeks. Heard of it?
http://www.bodyrecomposition.com/ultimate-diet-20
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jun 25, 2014 9:09am
If anyone wants the pdf I can send. PM me your email. It looks like an easy read. 70ish pages.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jun 25, 2014 9:19am
PM sent and thanks!Automatik;1629863 wrote:If anyone wants the pdf I can send. PM me your email. It looks like an easy read. 70ish pages.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jun 25, 2014 12:11pm
Sent to all who PM'd me so far except stephen3108. Gotta give me an email to sent to.
S
Sonofanump
Jul 1, 2014 8:23am
W
WebFire
Posts: 14,779
Jul 1, 2014 9:53am
Kind of a strange article, because it isn't defending endurance running at all. In fact, in it's own way it kind of is bashing endurance running, while bashing those that bash running.Sonofanump;1631819 wrote:This link belongs here...
http://www.t-nation.com/training/running-doesnt-suck
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jul 1, 2014 10:06am
If this article is to defend running, I never said all running is bad. In fact, if you're looking to defend distance running you're defeating your purpose. 800 meters, which is the max this guy is talking about, isn't what I'd call "distance' and it isn't going to eat away muscle. It's the "jogging" for distance (meaning multiple miles) when your cortisol starts to spike, etc. The author is basically repeating most of what I've been saying.Sonofanump;1631819 wrote:This link belongs here...
http://www.t-nation.com/training/running-doesnt-suck
If you keep the distances short enough and are busting ass, you're going to get fat burning/muscle BUILDING (not wasting) benefits from it.
vdubb96
Posts: 2,210
Jul 1, 2014 10:36am
This x1thBR1986FB;1631848 wrote:If this article is to defend running, I never said all running is bad. In fact, if you're looking to defend distance running you're defeating your purpose. 800 meters, which is the max this guy is talking about, isn't what I'd call "distance' and it isn't going to eat away muscle. It's the "jogging" for distance (meaning multiple miles) when your cortisol starts to spike, etc. The author is basically repeating most of what I've been saying.
If you keep the distances short enough and are busting ass, you're going to get fat burning/muscle BUILDING (not wasting) benefits from it.
arnie palmer
Posts: 198
Jul 1, 2014 11:09am
Started my second week of Ferrall's extreme body shaping 10 Wk Challenge. It is 6 days a week - 3 days Kickboxing and Cardio and 3 Days of band weight lifting. I am down 10 lbs from the first week and already seeing inches lost as well. Needed this from my back surgery in January and my inactivity since.
http://www.extremebodyshaping.com/
Also for those that want a good way to get your needed fruits and vegetables in your diet, you need to start taking Juice Plus. It is capsules of whole foods. My wife is a distributor and has had me and kids on it for awhile now. None of us has been sick since being on them and at my last check up my cholesterol was down 20 pts. without doing anything.
http://www.juiceplus.com/
http://www.extremebodyshaping.com/
Also for those that want a good way to get your needed fruits and vegetables in your diet, you need to start taking Juice Plus. It is capsules of whole foods. My wife is a distributor and has had me and kids on it for awhile now. None of us has been sick since being on them and at my last check up my cholesterol was down 20 pts. without doing anything.
http://www.juiceplus.com/
S
Sonofanump
Jul 1, 2014 12:02pm
I don't think the article defends "jogging" at all. His opinion with his evidence supports short distance sprints. I don't disagree with him on that. I however need my endurance cardio and will jog maybe 3-5 miles or bike 20-40 miles once a week. I don't ever plan on running long distances and would rather lift for 45 minutes than run 10 miles.BR1986FB;1631848 wrote:If this article is to defend running, I never said all running is bad. In fact, if you're looking to defend distance running you're defeating your purpose. 800 meters, which is the max this guy is talking about, isn't what I'd call "distance' and it isn't going to eat away muscle. It's the "jogging" for distance (meaning multiple miles) when your cortisol starts to spike, etc. The author is basically repeating most of what I've been saying.
If you keep the distances short enough and are busting ass, you're going to get fat burning/muscle BUILDING (not wasting) benefits from it.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Jul 1, 2014 12:08pm
As I've said before, do what you like. I'm not a fan of any kind of endurance running but it beats sitting on the couch.Sonofanump;1631922 wrote:I don't think the article defends "jogging" at all. His opinion with his evidence supports short distance sprints. I don't disagree with him on that. I however need my endurance cardio and will jog maybe 3-5 miles or bike 20-40 miles once a week. I don't ever plan on running long distances and would rather lift for 45 minutes than run 10 miles.
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jul 7, 2014 5:13pm
Did you read the UD 2.0 pdf? I'm about halfway through. Not the best read, but not terrible. I'm assuming the discussion regarding actual diet and workouts is towards the end.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jul 9, 2014 10:20am
For a novice runner, what is a good mile pace? I've gotten down to a consistent 7:30 and below.
S
Sonofanump
Jul 9, 2014 10:28am
How far are you running? That's a 23 minute 5K.ernest_t_bass;1634182 wrote:For a novice runner, what is a good mile pace? I've gotten down to a consistent 7:30 and below.
ernest_t_bass
Posts: 24,984
Jul 9, 2014 10:33am
Is that good or bad? Honestly, I never run more than 2 miles, mostly because I despise running.Sonofanump;1634187 wrote:How far are you running? That's a 23 minute 5K.