Con_Alma;1196799 wrote:...and a run can score from such contact. That's all I was trying to say. Your team always has a chance at something when the bat is on the ball. Your team doesn't when you strike out.
false! Passed ball!
Con_Alma;1196799 wrote:...and a run can score from such contact. That's all I was trying to say. Your team always has a chance at something when the bat is on the ball. Your team doesn't when you strike out.
Unless the ball gets away from the catcher.Con_Alma;1196799 wrote:...and a run can score from such contact. That's all I was trying to say. Your team always has a chance at something when the bat is on the ball. Your team doesn't when you strike out.
True.wes_mantooth;1196804 wrote:false! Passed ball!
Con_Alma;1196799 wrote:...and a run can score from such contact. That's all I was trying to say. Your team always has a chance at something when the bat is on the ball. Your team doesn't when you strike out.
I suppose you would. It's still and indication of risk reward choices as a player...or he doesn't guess very well.se-alum;1196825 wrote:Wouldn't you have to break it all the way down to rather or not there was someone on base when the strikeout occurred? With nobody on an out is an out, no matter how you make it. It would be interesting to see how many of the strikeouts came with runners on base.
...not a fan of the White Sox team personality either.Crimson streak;1196830 wrote:Who gives a **** about Adam Dunn lol. He plays for the whitesox. Right there makes him an instant douche
You're taking Kipnis over Bruce??Laley23;1196565 wrote:I've seen a lot of Tribe and Reds games. If in starting a team and have a pick of either teams position players. I'm taking Votto first overall and Kipnis second.
se-alum;1196841 wrote:You're taking Kipnis over Bruce??
Lol honestly how many reds games have you watched? If you say more than maybe 2 you're lying. Bruce has one of the best outfield arms in baseball, hes not just hitting homeruns, rarely makes an error, and is a leader on the team...big ol LOL @ he only hits homeruns.Crimson streak;1196844 wrote:I would in a second. Kipnis hits for a better average and has very good speed and solid d. All Bruce does is hit home runs but kipnis should be a guy who will hit 25-30 hrs a year. He's more valuable then Bruce
SportsAndLady;1196847 wrote:Lol honestly how many reds games have you watched? If you say more than maybe 2 you're lying. Bruce has one of the best outfield arms in baseball, hes not just hitting homeruns, rarely makes an error, and is a leader on the team...big ol LOL @ he only hits homeruns.
All Bruce does is hit homers? He also hits more doubles, has a higher OPS, and plays Gold Glove caliber defense.Crimson streak;1196844 wrote:I would in a second. Kipnis hits for a better average and has very good speed and solid d. All Bruce does is hit home runs but kipnis should be a guy who will hit 25-30 hrs a year. He's more valuable then Bruce
Absolutely.se-alum;1196841 wrote:You're taking Kipnis over Bruce??
Hes also a RFer. Kipnis is a middle IFer. If the numbers are similar, big advantage to the IF, imo.se-alum;1196858 wrote:All Bruce does is hit homers? He also hits more doubles, has a higher OPS, and plays Gold Glove caliber defense.
se-alum;1196858 wrote:All Bruce does is hit homers? He also hits more doubles, has a higher OPS, and plays Gold Glove caliber defense.
I was just letting you know that Bruce does more than hit homeruns. The only obvious advantage Kipnis has over Bruce is speed. Of course, Bruce is 4" taller and 40lbs heavier, so that's to be expected.Crimson streak;1196868 wrote:Kipnis has a higher obs, average, rbis, stolen bases less strike outs, 2 less walks, more triples, only 3 less homeruns and has 3 errors and more runs. Yeah I'll take him over Bruce
se-alum;1196882 wrote:I was just letting you know that Bruce does more than hit homeruns. The only obvious advantage Kipnis has over Bruce is speed. Of course, Bruce is 4" taller and 40lbs heavier, so that's to be expected.
LOL!Crimson streak;1196830 wrote:Who gives a **** about Adam Dunn lol. He plays for the whitesox. Right there makes him an instant douche
Easy, I'm not saying Kipnis isn't a good player, he seems to be. However, he's played a little over a 3rd of a Major League season. I'm interested to see how the league adjusts to him.Crimson streak;1196895 wrote:I'm just letting you know that kipnis is the better playerespecially when they have almost the same power numbers right now
This is my thought. Kipnis doesn't have 100 games under his belt yet. He looks like he'll be a good one, but a lot of guys start out hot and fall flat.se-alum;1196910 wrote:Easy, I'm not saying Kipnis isn't a good player, he seems to be. However, he's played a little over a 3rd of a Major League season. I'm interested to see how the league adjusts to him.
se-alum;1196910 wrote:Easy, I'm not saying Kipnis isn't a good player, he seems to be. However, he's played a little over a 3rd of a Major League season. I'm interested to see how the league adjusts to him.
Crimson streak;1196935 wrote:He came up middle of last year and has tore it up since he's been up. I could be wrong but I think he's here to stay.