like_that;1175210 wrote: Reps. Lol at him claiming us "23 year olds" waste our lives, yet he posts a fucking novel of complete spewed shit.

Says the guy who spends his entire life running tournaments in the basement here. Pathetic. Yeah, my post was pretty long...to clear the record. Get a job, start dating...find a wife...probably male, it's legal now...live your life. Until you do, you're just existing as a OC junkie. Take a bow. You've earned it.

pnhasbeen;1175224 wrote:Diverting from your obvious fail thread. Classic footwedge.

The thread failed because of assholes...23 year old assholes.

Footwedge;1175228 wrote:Says the guy who spends his entire life running tournaments in the basement here. Pathetic. Yeah, my post was pretty long...to clear the record. Get a job, start dating...find a wife...probably male, it's legal now...live your life. Until you do, you're just existing as a OC junkie. Take a bow. You've earned it.

not in ohio. you're wrong again.

Footwedge;1175228 wrote:Says the guy who spends his entire life running tournaments in the basement here. Pathetic. Yeah, my post was pretty long...to clear the record. Get a job, start dating...find a wife...probably male, it's legal now...live your life. Until you do, you're just existing as a OC junkie. Take a bow. You've earned it.

Aww old man has his little feelings hurt? It's ok little old man, somebody will listen to you spew your bullshit at the chess park.

Footwedge;1175231 wrote:The thread failed because of assholes...23 year old assholes.

The thread failed because you were wrong. The entire time.

Footwedge;1175231 wrote:The thread failed because of assholes...23 year old assholes.

I am 24. Thanks.

vball10set;1175187 wrote:tl;dr, and who the hell is Colletti? now, please go away

Not going anywhere, dick. Use your block button.

like_that;1175236 wrote:I am 24. Thanks.

oh, so you don't want to be grouped with me. ever heard of band of brothers? you should rent it sometime.

pnhasbeen;1175239 wrote:oh, so you don't want to be grouped with me. ever heard of band of brothers? you should rent it sometime.

I just want footwedge to respect me, since 23 is apparently the cut off.

like_that;1175236 wrote:I am 24. Thanks.

No need to thank me. Aren't your basement buds calling you? Don't you ever get tired of the stench down there? You run a 24/7 shop down there. Losers enjoy company...amirite?

pnhasbeen;1175235 wrote:The thread failed because you were wrong. The entire time.

ZZZZZzzzz.....West Coast db at work I see. Is that it? Tell me where I was wrong. You can't be wrong when you state an opinion. You and your toadies deserved the bitch slapping.

Footwedge;1173662 wrote:I don't know Sherlock...maybe we'll fuckin find out, eh Slick?

Footwedge;1173682 wrote:Given your history around here, I'd be really careful in criticizing anyone regarding trade value, just sayin.

Footwedge;1175249 wrote:No need to thank me. Aren't your basement buds calling you? Don't you ever get tired of the stench down there? You run a 24/7 shop down there. Losers enjoy company...amirite?

Reported for insult.

Footwedge;1175258 wrote:ZZZZZzzzz.....West Coast db at work I see. Is that it? Tell me where I was wrong. You can't be wrong when you state an opinion. You and your toadies deserved the bitch slapping.

reported for mocking

Footwedge;1175237 wrote:Not going anywhere, dick. Use your block button.

Reported for insult.

Footwedge;1175231 wrote:The thread failed because of assholes...23 year old assholes.

Reported for insult.

like_that;1175243 wrote:I just want footwedge to respect me, since 23 is apparently the cut off.

The internet...where people like Like--that can find their calling. You give me shit about posting a long monologue...and you spend weeks describing posters here in the basement. Enjoy your miserable. pathetic life.

When I was your age, I lived...I didn't rot in front of a computer screen.

Footwedge;1175266 wrote:The internet...where people like Like--that can find their calling. You give me shit about posting a long monologue...and you spend weeks describing posters here in the basement. Enjoy your miserable. pathetic life.

When I was your age, I lived...I didn't rot in front of a computer screen.

Reported for insult.

like_that;1175264 wrote:Reported for insult.

LOL...Running to the mods...from a guy who lives 24/7 in the OC basement. "Irony"...look it up.

Footwedge;1175272 wrote:LOL...Running to the mods...from a guy who lives 24/7 in the OC basement. "Irony"...look it up.

Reported for mocking.

Footwedge;1173653 wrote:110 million over how many years? And it's not at all unusual for a team like New York to huff the major portion of a contract.

chicago510;1173656 wrote:Show me the last time New York ate a 9 figure contract.

This question was never answered.

Footwedge;1173738 wrote:Citing "useless things like statistics" LOLOL. What do you base trade value on? Eh Slick.

Once again, you can't read. He didn't call statistics useless, he called batting average and saves useless.

Footwedge;1173756 wrote:Yeah...winning a batting title is worthless...as is winning the save title. Folks...the dude really said that. LOLOOL. Tee it back up Slick, I'll give you yet another mulligan.

Now here comes the sabre metrics nonsense that Billy Beane uses to put out a perrenial loser. LMAO.

Mooney44Cards;1173851 wrote:Hey guys Billy Beane is a perennial loser with his 5 playoff appearances is 7 years with one of the bottom 3 payrolls in all of baseball.

At least the facts agree with you FootWedge.

Proven wrong again.

Footwedge;1173858 wrote:
You are the one that listed one stat...i.e. batting average...asking which is more valuable a 250 hitter or a 325 hitter. That's what you asked...and as it stands..only an inebriated person would ask.

pnhasbeen;1173865 wrote:Actually, post #14 was the first time the one stat...i.e. batting average...was brought up. Guess who said it?

I'll give you a hint...it was you.

Boom. Roasted.

Footwedge;1173874 wrote:Maybe so...maybe not. A young Perez vs. an old first baseman who's stats have remarkably declined is certainly subject for debate. Thus the thread I created. Like I've said 7 times or so...one would have to be an idiot in tasking a chance on Tex. Colletti agrees with me...not that that means much.

Indian fans have learned a hard lesson with the Ubaldo trade. Doubt management screws up like that again.

pnhasbeen;1173853 wrote:Texeria: '09- 156 games, 39 HR, 122 RBI, .292 BA, .565 slugging,
'10- 158 games, 33 HR, 108 RBI, .256 BA, .481 slugging
'11- 156 games, 39 HR, 111 RBI, .248 BA, .494 slugging
'12- 35 games, 5 HR, 19 RBI, .232 BA, .399 slugging

Perez: '09 32 games, 0-1 record, 4.32 ERA, 1 save
'10 63 games, 2-2 record, 1.71 ERA, 23 saves
'11 64 games, 4-7 record, 3.32 ERA, 36 saves
'12 16 games, 0-1 record, 3.68, 12 saves

Even though Texeria's BA has dropped the last couple years and he's had a shitty season thus far, he still has a greater value than a closer.

Remarkably declined? Games played are similar, home runs are similar, RBIs are similar, slugging is pretty close. The only stat that has declined is batting average. Wrong again.

Footwedge;1173891 wrote:No offense Hoop....but I would be 5-2 with Ubaldo's run support. Let me know when your cousin Ubaldo breaks 5.00 in his ERA.

pnhasbeen;1173904 wrote:Ubaldo starts, Indians win, ~5.3 runs per game
Ubaldo starts, Indians lose, ~3.2 runs per game

His run support isn't that great wedge.

Speaks for itself.

Footwedge;1173929 wrote:Fake stats? What fake stats? And if you have a problem with nixing Perez for Tex trade, then call up Chuck tomorrow and let let him know.

pnhasbeen;1173930 wrote:The fake stats, he is referring to you ignoring the significance of sabermetrics. No need to call to "nix" the trade because the trade would never fucking happen.

Which is shown above talking about billy beane.

Footwedge;1175228 wrote:Says the guy who spends his entire life running tournaments in the basement here. Pathetic. Yeah, my post was pretty long...to clear the record. Get a job, start dating...find a wife...probably male, it's legal now...live your life. Until you do, you're just existing as a OC junkie. Take a bow. You've earned it.

pnhasbeen;1175233 wrote:not in ohio. you're wrong again.

and the world turns..

Footwedge;1175258 wrote:ZZZZZzzzz.....West Coast db at work I see. Is that it? Tell me where I was wrong. You can't be wrong when you state an opinion. You and your toadies deserved the bitch slapping.

Not on the west coast, old man. And I just told you where you were wrong. Your "opinion" has been proven wrong with facts multiple times. 162 game season, lost a couple to Cleveland. I'll be alright. We were a 100 loss team last year. Think I care?

pnhasbeen;1175285 wrote:This question was never answered.

I don't lollygag around here answering all the trivial questions.

he called batting average and saves useless.

And anyone that shares that opinion should quit watching baseball. He's clueless.

Proven wrong again.

Really? Nothing could be further from the truth.
LOL. Pinhead...tl;dr. The only one doing the roasting on this thread was me.

pnhasbeen;1175285 wrote: Not on the west coast, old man. And I just told you where you were wrong. Your "opinion" has been proven wrong with facts multiple times.

My opinion has been proven wrong? Look up the word "opinion" and get back to me.

The 23 year olds sure are huffy this afternoon. Since they don't work, they don't have much to do on a Friday afternoon I see.

Footwedge;1175293 wrote:I don't lollygag around here answering all the trivial questions.


And anyone that shares that opinion should quit watching baseball. He's clueless.


Really? Nothing could be further from the truth.
LOL. Pinhead...tl;dr. The only one doing the roasting on this thread was me.

That "trivial" question was directly related to the topic at hand, but probably would have proved you wrong(again) so you ignored it.

Batting average is a small percentage of the total production a player provides. So batting average, by itself is a very useless statistic.
And saves, as a singular stat, isn't very important.

oakland wins since 2000: 91, 102, 103, 96, 91, 88, 93, 76, 75, 75, 81, 74.

so the past five years their best year was 81-81 and 2nd in the AL west. that's far from a "perennial loser."

Footwedge;1175299 wrote:My opinion has been proven wrong? Look up the word "opinion" and get back to me.

You ignored my use of quotations because, well, you ignore a lot of things.

My opinion is that Ichiro is one of the best power hitters in the league. The "opinion" can be easily proven to be way off base.

Oh, and I like how you made your signature a completely changed statement from what it was original. Nice.