Footwedge;1173900 wrote:You don't want me to show you the runs per game average for your cousin do you? When's Ubaldo going to hit the kthe Ubaldo line?

Some day, Mario Mendoza will have some company.

Footwedge;1173900 wrote:You don't want me to show you the runs per game average for your cousin do you? When's Ubaldo going to hit the kthe Ubaldo line?

Some day, Mario Mendoza will have some company.

pnhasbeen;1173904 wrote:Ubaldo starts, Indians win, ~5.3 runs per game
Ubaldo starts, Indians lose, ~3.2 runs per game

His run support isn't that great wedge.

Mooney44Cards;1173899 wrote:No offense Footwedge, but literally everyone in this thread has not only disagreed with you, but basically laughed at you. You have made several idiotic claims that have been refuted with evidence as to why you are completely wrong. You have chosen to ignore those posts, or childishly laughed at people and threatening to "light them up" if it wasn't for new rules. You have provided ABSOLUTELY no proof why ANY reliever (plays in maybe ~60 games), let alone Chris Perez, is worth ANY 1B (plays in maybe ~150 games), let alone Mark Teixeira. You can laugh off sabermetrics all you want, but the stats have been developed with logic and reasoning, and every team has embraced them.....Billy Beane just started the trend. Your "LOLOL your opinion is so stupid I'm laughing at it look at me go LOLOLOL" schtick just reeks of having no clue how to discuss anything, let alone sports, like an adult.

hoops23;1173901 wrote:Footwedge is only here to school all of us yungin's

Footwedge;1173908 wrote:Mooney...I attract a lot of attention from people that don't like my vast array of intellectual prowess. I just can't help the fact that I do in fact know everything!!

Like I said...you had a bad day here on the chatter. You made a drunk post. It happens sometimes.

It even happened to me one time about 4 or 5 years ago.

Don't be mad bro. I'm just happy you don't run the tribe organization. We cannot afford another Ubaldo trade.

Footwedge;1173908 wrote:Mooney...I attract a lot of attention from people that don't like my vast array of intellectual prowess. I just can't help the fact that I do in fact know everything!!

Like I said...you had a bad day here on the chatter. You made a drunk post. It happens sometimes.

It even happened to me one time about 4 or 5 years ago.

Don't be mad bro. I'm just happy you don't run the tribe organization. We cannot afford another Ubaldo trade.

Footwedge;1173908 wrote:Something deflecting more attention away from how wrong my opinions are

Mooney44Cards;1173915 wrote:Yet another member of Ohio Chatter who uses logic fallacies to defend his opinions.

hoops23;1173914 wrote:People who gloat about money usually don't have as much as they say. Same with self-appointed intelligence.

Your typos and grammatical errors prove that theory.

Footwedge;1173919 wrote:Lemme guess Moonie...you're 23..maybe 24 years old? Anyone that changes a quote like that is a loser...in real life. Debate an issue...don't defaultb to the tactics of other ass clowns here.

As for Hoops' cousin and his stats. Ubaldo still owns the highest WHIP of any pitcher on the team...and ranks third from the bottom in ERA.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/team/stats/pitching/_/name/cle/cleveland-indians

But...but...but.....he's won 4 games! Only on the chatter...great fun......great entertainment. I really should have to pay for this.

Footwedge;1173921 wrote:Ummmm...a little tongue in cheek action there Hoops...flew right over your head. Kinda like an Ubaldo fastball to a number 9 hitter.

pnhasbeen;1173911 wrote:Wait, you are wrong. Your entire thread was awful. You don't know everything. In fact, as Mooney said, you have been proven wrong many times on this very thread and just try to sidestep and divert. Your "intellectual prowess" is about as impressive as Texeria's .232 batting average.

Footwedge;1173925 wrote:Dude...Really...It's tongue in cheek material. I don't mean to invade your head like that. Take a sleeping pill and hit the sack. You'll get em tomorrow!

hoops23;1173923 wrote:You used BA as a basis for determining that Tex was washed up. I'd say wins are a more important stat than BA, no?

The fact that you honestly think this trade could happen and that the Tribe should deny it if it did is hilarious and very telling of your actual mental state.

It's also funny that you pull out stats to try and support your claims, but when people do the same and completely destroy any sentiment you actually have, you just "LOL FAKE STATS< LOL$%%"

SMH.

Footwedge;1173929 wrote:Fake stats? What fake stats? And if you have a problem with nixing Perez for Tex trade, then call up Chuck tomorrow and Let let him know.

pnhasbeen;1173928 wrote:Wedgie, take a sleeping pill and hit the sack. You'll get em tomorrow since you have so obviously failed today.

You did about as well as King Felix tonight.

Footwedge;1173931 wrote:Actually...good advice there Pinatta. I've gotta a busy day tomorrow. It's just a little hard for me to walk away from all this free entertaininment.

Laley23;1173937 wrote:I dont think Id trade Tex for Mo, the best closer fo all time. I certianly dont even entertain the thought of trading him for Perez, a top half closer of 2011 and now 2012. But if this was real, and the Tribe turned it down, I would burn down the Prog.

Ubaldo's ERA is lower than the combined ERA of White (6+era) and Pom(4.7 ERA) and he has 4 more wins. Keep spinning Wedgie.