Pitbulls are for poor stupid people

Home ▸ Archive ▸ Thread Bomber's Basement ▸ Pitbulls are for poor stupid people
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
May 31, 2012 9:41 AM
isadore;1185719 wrote:many acts have become criminal once people understood the threat. In this south carolina case parents were charged with neglect for having venomous snakes in their home.
http://www2.wspa.com/news/2012/apr/26/7/greenville-county-man-charged-keeping-venomous-sna-ar-3681380/
hopefully they will be doing the same with parents who bring pit bulls into their homes.
lol again no comparison. There is no law and it's not criminal to own a breed of dog and raise them the right way.

You're a delusional loser.
May 31, 2012 9:41am
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

Senior Member

4,278 posts
May 31, 2012 9:44 AM
isadore;1185695 wrote:not as bad as I feel for yours, no one ever died from bad sentence structure. Bringing children around pit bulls is criminal neglect.
Then come and perfom a citizens arrest. My pitbull will lick you to death while my wifes shitzu tries to tear your ass up.
May 31, 2012 9:44am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
May 31, 2012 9:47 AM
isadore;1185719 wrote:many acts have become criminal once people understood the threat. In this south carolina case parents were charged with neglect for having venomous snakes in their home.
http://www2.wspa.com/news/2012/apr/26/7/greenville-county-man-charged-keeping-venomous-sna-ar-3681380/
hopefully they will be doing the same with parents who bring pit bulls into their homes.
Neglect certainly can be a crime. In the case you listed there were additional circumstances which led to such neglect. Is bringing a pit-bull or snake into the house a crime on it's own? I think those types of laws are regional. Are they not?

A generalized statement such as, "bringing either animal into a household is criminal" just doesn't seem to be accurate.
May 31, 2012 9:47am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
May 31, 2012 9:48 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1185736 wrote:lol again no comparison. There is no law and it's not criminal to own a breed of dog and raise them the right way.

You're a delusional loser.
I am sure that is what those people said aboout their snakes. bringing a type of dog that has a proclivity for killing children is worse than neglect, it is depraved indifference.
May 31, 2012 9:48am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
May 31, 2012 9:50 AM
rmolin73;1185739 wrote:Then come and perfom a citizens arrest. My pitbull will lick you to death while my wifes ****zu tries to tear your ass up.
anyone who would, would be doing a great kindness to the infirm, young or aged in your home.
May 31, 2012 9:50am
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

Senior Member

4,278 posts
May 31, 2012 9:53 AM
isadore;1185749 wrote:anyone who would, would be doing a great kindness to the infirm, young or aged in your home.
Negative, keep failing its hilarious.
May 31, 2012 9:53am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
May 31, 2012 9:53 AM
Con_Alma;1185743 wrote:Neglect certainly can be a crime. In the case you listed there were additional circumstances which led to such neglect. Is bringing a pit-bull or snake into the house a crime on it's own? I think those types of laws are regional. Are they not?

A generalized statement such as, "bringing either animal into a household is criminal" just doesn't seem to be accurate.
if it isn't against the law it should be. they are at least expected to keep the snakes in the proper holding containers, they folks let killer dogs roam through their homes.
May 31, 2012 9:53am
C

Con_Alma

Senior Member

12,198 posts
May 31, 2012 9:54 AM
isadore;1185757 wrote:if it isn't against the law it should be. they are at least expected to keep the snakes in the proper holding containers, they folks let killer dogs roam through their homes.
Ahhh, so it was opinion. I get it now. Thanks.
May 31, 2012 9:54am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
May 31, 2012 9:56 AM
Con_Alma;1185758 wrote:Ahhh, so it was opinion. I get it now. Thanks.
His whole "argument" is based on opinion with a smattering of isolated attacks shown from story links.
May 31, 2012 9:56am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
May 31, 2012 9:58 AM
rmolin73;1185753 wrote:Negative, keep failing its hilarious.
failing nothing, just showing the kind of people who defend these killer dogs and find this
hilarious.
May 31, 2012 9:58am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
May 31, 2012 10:00 AM
BR1986FB;1185761 wrote:His whole "argument" is based on opinion with a smattering of isolated attacks shown from story links.
proven fact they are the number type of dog for killing people
May 31, 2012 10:00am
A

Al Bundy

Senior Member

4,180 posts
May 31, 2012 10:11 AM
isadore;1185769 wrote:proven fact they are the number type of dog for killing people
There are many types of isolated accidents that kids can die from. A child is much more likely to drown in his/her home than the child is to be killed by a dog. Should we eliminate liquids in a home because that would eliminate any chance of a child drowning. Water is much more likely to cause drowning than any other liquid, therefore we should ban water from every home in the best interest of children.
May 31, 2012 10:11am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
May 31, 2012 10:15 AM
Al Bundy;1185782 wrote:There are many types of isolated accidents that kids can die from. A child is much more likely to drown in his/her home than the child is to be killed by a dog. Should we eliminate liquids in a home because that would eliminate any chance of a child drowning. Water is much more likely to cause drowning than any other liquid, therefore we should ban water from every home in the best interest of children.
Waits for Isadore to quote you, post the picture of the kid with the mangled face with the caption "water never did this to a child" in 3....2.....1.....
May 31, 2012 10:15am
rmolin73's avatar

rmolin73

Senior Member

4,278 posts
May 31, 2012 10:18 AM
According to.isadores logic we should all avoid these.

May 31, 2012 10:18am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
May 31, 2012 10:23 AM
Al Bundy;1185782 wrote:There are many types of isolated accidents that kids can die from. A child is much more likely to drown in his/her home than the child is to be killed by a dog. Should we eliminate liquids in a home because that would eliminate any chance of a child drowning. Water is much more likely to cause drowning than any other liquid, therefore we should ban water from every home in the best interest of children.
gosh a ruddies it would of course be difficult to eliminate water from your home because it is a necessity of life. Pit Bulls are not. In fact their are untold possible substitutes for a Pit Bull, a type dog that kills more humans than any other. Gosh there are innumberable types of dogs that have no record of killing humans. Why should people bring these killers into their homes when there are so many safer alternatives, it is depraved indifference to do it.
May 31, 2012 10:23am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
May 31, 2012 10:25 AM
rmolin73;1185789 wrote:According to.isadores logic we should all avoid these.

as already has been stated there are so many safer alternatives to pit bulls that provide very similar set of services without anywhere near the danger.
May 31, 2012 10:25am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
May 31, 2012 10:27 AM
Al Bundy;1185782 wrote:There are many types of isolated accidents that kids can die from. A child is much more likely to drown in his/her home than the child is to be killed by a dog. Should we eliminate liquids in a home because that would eliminate any chance of a child drowning. Water is much more likely to cause drowning than any other liquid, therefore we should ban water from every home in the best interest of children.
That is a very bad comparison. Water is present in EVERY home. Water cannot kill a human without a human causing it.
May 31, 2012 10:27am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
May 31, 2012 10:29 AM
rmolin73;1185789 wrote:According to.isadores logic we should all avoid these.

Again, bad comparison. A good comparison would be that if car make A was statistically involved in significantly more fatal crashes than car make B. Car A would be considered more dangerous than Car B.
May 31, 2012 10:29am
B

BR1986FB

Senior Member

24,104 posts
May 31, 2012 10:29 AM
WebFire;1185799 wrote:That is a very bad comparison. Water is present in EVERY home. Water cannot kill a human without a human causing it.
Just like a dog isn't likely going to kill someone without provocation.
May 31, 2012 10:29am
W

WebFire

Go Bucks!

14,779 posts
May 31, 2012 10:30 AM
BR1986FB;1185803 wrote:Just like a dog isn't likely going to kill someone without provocation.
Generally true. But they can. And have. You cannot use inanimate objects in any comparison to dogs.
May 31, 2012 10:30am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
May 31, 2012 10:32 AM
BR1986FB;1185803 wrote:Just like a dog isn't likely going to kill someone without provocation.
obviously you havent read the thread an seen example after example of pits attacking without provocation. talk about blame the victim. according to you it was that little girls fault.
May 31, 2012 10:32am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
May 31, 2012 10:34 AM
isadore;1185807 wrote:obviously you havent read the thread an seen example after example of pits attacking without provocation. talk about blame the victim. according to you it was that little girls fault.
i hope it was your kid - stfu already
May 31, 2012 10:34am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
May 31, 2012 10:41 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1185808 wrote:i hope it was your kid - stfu already
I will continue to write the truth.
May 31, 2012 10:41am
Raw Dawgin' it's avatar

Raw Dawgin' it

Just Ain't Care

11,466 posts
May 31, 2012 10:44 AM
isadore;1185813 wrote:I will continue to write the truth.
can't continue something you haven't even started.
May 31, 2012 10:44am
I

isadore

Senior Member

7,762 posts
May 31, 2012 11:03 AM
Raw Dawgin' it;1185815 wrote:can't continue something you haven't even started.
I am sorry for you, you can not recognize the truth. Rethink your priorities.
May 31, 2012 11:03am