sleeper;1161505 wrote:Who's fault is that? If they don't want to go to school to better themselves and a get a job, they can work at McDonald's. If they don't want to work, then they don't get anything.

It's EZ.

sleeper;1161508 wrote:Why?

isadore;1161511 wrote:not everyone can get a Master's degree, pay at McD does not cover the basic needs for family, especially one with a single parent. And hopefully the government will continue to tax you to feed them.

isadore;1161513 wrote:it is a good idea.

sleeper;1161507 wrote:I already pay more than my fair share. I will vote for people who want to give me more of my money back and make the non-producers start producing.

sleeper;1161517 wrote:Link?

isadore;1161518 wrote:no obviously you dont, because there are people in America in need.

isadore;1161520 wrote:read the commentary and learn, I can not do anything about your reading comprehension.

sleeper;1161516 wrote:Obviously you've never worked at my McDonald's. We pay a fair wage to our employees, which is slightly above minimum. If you can't support your family on that, then don't have kids. Personal responsibility is out the window in your liberal pipe dream.

isadore;1161527 wrote:lol really, you tell them to go to work and McD, then you admit its not enough. what an untruthteller you are.

sleeper;1161523 wrote:I can't do anything about your broken mind or your low salary. You can, though; that is if you ever decide to stop playing the victim and get a job like the rest of us.

sleeper;1161529 wrote:I don't tell them to reproduce and support a family when they don't make enough salary. Personal accountability and responsibility. You and your liberal friends could use some.

isadore;1161530 wrote:well I live well and I stll have a heart. You should try it some time.

isadore;1161468 wrote:gosh a ruddies I thought alot about it. And checked a few things and found out that those nations with the more extensive welfare systems, more entitlements and a more progressive tax system are the ones that are more socially mobile, more opportunity to rise. Americawith attitudes like your is way down the opportunity list.

isadore;1161532 wrote:gosh you belong either in Nazi Germany or China, you want to sterilize the Poor. Guys like you ended up at Nuremburg.

sleeper;1161531 wrote:And we do have a single mother who works for us. She was hired because she's a hard worker and will probably start her own franchise someday. Then she can pop out as many babies as she wants.

Until then...

isadore;1161501 wrote:was your Masters in French Poetry

Otherwise it much like the experience of many people in college, finishing an advanced degree with the promise of greater reward in the near future.
And not much like the situation of the single parent families living in poverty today who are not finishing off a Master's degree.

sleeper;1161533 wrote:Ah, a limousine liberal. Such a fraud and a hypocrite, thankfully that only makes up 99% of the Democratic party and not 100%.

isadore;1161536 wrote:gosh a ruddies you Republican types on one side oppose abortion even birth control then this. You been arguing to sterilize all these poor people

isadore;1161540 wrote:limousines are saved for republicans to drive over the poor.

isadore;1161501 wrote:was your Masters in French Poetry

Otherwise it much like the experience of many people in college, finishing an advanced degree with the promise of greater reward in the near future.
And not much like the situation of the single parent families living in poverty today who are not finishing off a Master's degree.

QuakerOats;1161534 wrote:There is no where to rise to in a 'progressive' socialist society; you know that, I know that, we all know that. You and other proegressives (code word for marxists) want to live off other people's labors; that is abhorrent. You ought to be ashamed. If someone truly, truly needs help, tons of help is available; but 47 million Americans don't need help ---- most are mooching.

jmog;1161543 wrote:Actually no its not, being married with 2 kids and living on our own was/is NOT the 'norm'.