Steel Valley Football;1145643 wrote:Ok, so they'd need a list of this diseases. What if a case where a disease they hadn't thought of comes up?
What about an auto accident where there the mom became paralyzed and needed help to eat? Would that apply also? If so, what if the auto accident was a result of the mom doing drugs and she killed someone else in another car?
Hopefully, you see where I'm going w this. There are too many variables so they have a general rule in place and they work from there. Which is exactly what happened in this case. But, instead of thinking it through, people just immediately throw dumb comments around about how dumb and lazy the school ADs are.
They don't need a list of diseases. Not everything needs to be a hyper controlled bureaucratic clusterfuck.
That's the laziness I'm talking about. Wanting to have a reaction and reprimand and solution to every possible situation already thought out is impossible and so your solution is to just make blanket policies. That's what our school boards do now and it blows. Sure if they react on a situation by situation basis they may occasionally run into a snafu but it's simply the right thing to do.
A great example would be with fights. Most schools today have zero tolerance policies wherein if you are in a fight you are suspended no matter the circumstances. Not exactly fair for someone who gets attacked and doesn't retaliate or only retaliates enough to get separation or to settle the situation. Blanket policies don't serve that person justly.
Just as blanket policies on things like excused absences don't justly apply to students who are caring for their terminally ill parents.
And the school administration is dumb and lazy. If they weren't they would have fucking known about the kid's situation or talked to him when he came close to/went over the allowed days missed and they would have came to the conclusion (if they had a brain or heart) that the kid deserved to walk (assuming his grades are in line with graduation requirements).