data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d73c0/d73c02d7a31cddb4212d48a3676b77a6e5f0632f" alt="jpake1's avatar"
jpake1
Posts: 2,389
Jan 25, 2012 9:31pm
Does anybody know of any online places that do Super Bowl squares? My guy isn't doing a second board this year and I'm shit out of luck.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/392b2/392b218150ea2bdc792a7aa26edde1c30872713f" alt="bradmaynard's avatar"
bradmaynard
Posts: 277
Jan 26, 2012 2:19am
Please explain to me how you came to this gem of a conclusion? Was it completion percentage? No. Yards? No. Touchdowns? No. TDs to INTS? No. QB rating? No. Wins? No. Playoff victories? No.BearBoy69;1065009 wrote:If Eli is elite then so is Cam Newton.
Other note: Even if Ben is not elite, he is def still top five, 2 SB rings, 3 appearances, a healthy Big Ben is dangerous, right now he makes that offense
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/728bb/728bbcae8b480c61bedc34612a47ab4cd46cbbd8" alt="royal_k's avatar"
royal_k
Posts: 4,423
Jan 26, 2012 10:26am
I see these offenses as being a toss up. Both QBs are elite IMO. The Giants have the edge in defense and special teams. The Pats have the edge with the "Hoodie", because nobody gameplans like he does. I'm going with the Giants in a close one. Something like 27-23.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aee0/3aee0daed7b5a104db3b405b175649feaad74936" alt="Raw Dawgin' it's avatar"
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 26, 2012 10:40am
If the patriots O line can hold strong they'll be fine. I also think they need to get the law firm going.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/410a9/410a978581792d9f8b313336ad9405fb930b44ab" alt="DeyDurkie5's avatar"
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Jan 26, 2012 11:53am
Giants are the better team, giants win.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb2dd/eb2ddb24099d7f8ff52452d5fdeb88ff25dfb9ee" alt="Automatik's avatar"
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jan 26, 2012 12:25pm
Key of the game...if the Gmen front 7 can get to Brady, which I think they can.
I'm kind of indifferent on the game. I call NE winning it a while ago, but I don't plan on putting any cash on it so I wouldn't mind seeing NY win. I'm here so why not. Giants fans are a hell of a lot more tolerable than fans of NY Ryans.
I'm kind of indifferent on the game. I call NE winning it a while ago, but I don't plan on putting any cash on it so I wouldn't mind seeing NY win. I'm here so why not. Giants fans are a hell of a lot more tolerable than fans of NY Ryans.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79e97/79e97f67f2e42e4eb5ba600a0136c83d75ee8c0a" alt="Commander of Awesome's avatar"
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Jan 26, 2012 12:53pm
Big if. I'd be worried about the Giant's WRs abusing the patriots poor pass coverage.Raw Dawgin' it;1066227 wrote:If the patriots O line can hold strong they'll be fine. I also think they need to get the law firm going.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aee0/3aee0daed7b5a104db3b405b175649feaad74936" alt="Raw Dawgin' it's avatar"
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 26, 2012 2:02pm
they didn't do too bad the last time they played. They gave up 24 points but if they offense is clicking then hopefully they can take some pressure off the defense to constantly make big stopsCommander of Awesome;1066420 wrote:Big if. I'd be worried about the Giant's WRs abusing the patriots poor pass coverage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe6b/4fe6b4547c8454a59e70b8cece0bddf568256a67" alt="Laley23's avatar"
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Jan 26, 2012 2:28pm
I forget, cause it was early on. But did Nicks and or Manningham play in that game?Raw Dawgin' it;1066522 wrote:they didn't do too bad the last time they played. They gave up 24 points but if they offense is clicking then hopefully they can take some pressure off the defense to constantly make big stops
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aee0/3aee0daed7b5a104db3b405b175649feaad74936" alt="Raw Dawgin' it's avatar"
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 26, 2012 3:33pm
No Nicks no Bradshaw.Laley23;1066581 wrote:I forget, cause it was early on. But did Nicks and or Manningham play in that game?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe6b/4fe6b4547c8454a59e70b8cece0bddf568256a67" alt="Laley23's avatar"
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Jan 26, 2012 3:47pm
Thanks. Bradshaw I didnt know, but him playing wont be as big a deal as Nicks, imo. Nicks will free up Cruz to be single covered more going up the seam and on the drag routes.Raw Dawgin' it;1066744 wrote:No Nicks no Bradshaw.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aee0/3aee0daed7b5a104db3b405b175649feaad74936" alt="Raw Dawgin' it's avatar"
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 26, 2012 4:02pm
I agree, totally forgot he didn't play. But i think it really comes down to our O line and running game. Brady needs time to throw and the run needs to set our play action since NE does so much of it.Laley23;1066767 wrote:Thanks. Bradshaw I didnt know, but him playing wont be as big a deal as Nicks, imo. Nicks will free up Cruz to be single covered more going up the seam and on the drag routes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb2dd/eb2ddb24099d7f8ff52452d5fdeb88ff25dfb9ee" alt="Automatik's avatar"
Automatik
Posts: 14,632
Jan 26, 2012 4:09pm
So IF Brady does get this W, where does he rank all time? Will he be deemed as the GOAT?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52c0f/52c0f571e3c91de9ed447a7d2cc8cab470fa79ba" alt="BearBoy69's avatar"
BearBoy69
Posts: 291
Jan 26, 2012 11:13pm
Read my Sports Illustrated today... they predict Giants 27 and Pats 20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aee0/3aee0daed7b5a104db3b405b175649feaad74936" alt="Raw Dawgin' it's avatar"
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 27, 2012 8:07am
Who else has 4 sbs? I think you also have to factor in 4 SB in 5 trips since 2001. Pretty impressive stretch.Automatik;1066791 wrote:So IF Brady does get this W, where does he rank all time? Will he be deemed as the GOAT?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52c0f/52c0f571e3c91de9ed447a7d2cc8cab470fa79ba" alt="BearBoy69's avatar"
BearBoy69
Posts: 291
Jan 27, 2012 8:19am
This game could go either way, and i HATE the Pats, but nobobdy beats Brady twice in a season.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe6b/4fe6b4547c8454a59e70b8cece0bddf568256a67" alt="Laley23's avatar"
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Jan 27, 2012 8:26am
2006 - PeytonBearBoy69;1067438 wrote:This game could go either way, and i HATE the Pats, but nobobdy beats Brady twice in a season.
2010 - Sanchez (ok the Jets, lol)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/118c7/118c7b2f936579e8a519ad63600cc64074a46559" alt="Skyhook79's avatar"
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 27, 2012 10:26am
Terry Bradshaw and Joe Montana are both 4-0 in Super Bowls.Raw Dawgin' it;1067423 wrote:Who else has 4 sbs? I think you also have to factor in 4 SB in 5 trips since 2001. Pretty impressive stretch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aee0/3aee0daed7b5a104db3b405b175649feaad74936" alt="Raw Dawgin' it's avatar"
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 27, 2012 11:26am
So then a win makes him top 3 and then talking heads can rank them based on all their stats.Skyhook79;1067550 wrote:Terry Bradshaw and Joe Montana are both 4-0 in Super Bowls.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/118c7/118c7b2f936579e8a519ad63600cc64074a46559" alt="Skyhook79's avatar"
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 27, 2012 1:14pm
Terry Bradshaw is not a top 3 QB of all time. I was just showing who has 4 SB wins.Raw Dawgin' it;1067604 wrote:So then a win makes him top 3 and then talking heads can rank them based on all their stats.
To me its (If Brady wins another)
1. Tom Brady
2. Joe Montana
3. Peyton Manning
T
Tiernan
Posts: 13,021
Jan 27, 2012 2:02pm
Bro-in-law in Vegas says a huge influx of NYG money will move the line to 2 by kick-off. O/U @ 55 is highest in SB history.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aee0/3aee0daed7b5a104db3b405b175649feaad74936" alt="Raw Dawgin' it's avatar"
Raw Dawgin' it
Posts: 11,466
Jan 27, 2012 2:12pm
Heard on mike and mike that the point differential from their last 3 meetings is NY +4. These games are always close, i'd take the under on 55.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1da73/1da730efff03326445fb35ac5166005cbb876f87" alt="like_that's avatar"
like_that
Posts: 26,625
Jan 27, 2012 2:21pm
First time I will ever agree with you. Bradshaw isn't even close to a top 3 QB. Without looking at a list of QBs, I honestly don't think I'd put Bradshaw in the top 15.Skyhook79;1067734 wrote:Terry Bradshaw is not a top 3 QB of all time. I was just showing who has 4 SB wins.
To me its (If Brady wins another)
1. Tom Brady
2. Joe Montana
3. Peyton Manning
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a754/8a754729bd580a7fab0b723981fe7b9b2e43dd5d" alt="SportsAndLady's avatar"
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Jan 27, 2012 4:12pm
Definitely under on that O/U
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/118c7/118c7b2f936579e8a519ad63600cc64074a46559" alt="Skyhook79's avatar"
Skyhook79
Posts: 5,739
Jan 27, 2012 4:48pm
First time you have ever admitted agreeing with me. You know you have many times before.:thumbup:like_that;1067808 wrote:First time I will ever agree with you. Bradshaw isn't even close to a top 3 QB. Without looking at a list of QBs, I honestly don't think I'd put Bradshaw in the top 15.