B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Apr 17, 2012 9:05pm
Ahhh to be young & goofy again...DeyDurkie5;1146346 wrote: The steak dinner will be coming this year BR, and I can't wait.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwq7BYOnDrM
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 17, 2012 9:06pm
Footwedge;1146347 wrote:No...but Auburn is. Excuse me for mistaking his A for Auburn. Given his mathematics skillset, Arizona people would be embarassed as hell.
See my above post about how pathetically embarrassing your math skills are. I'm fairly certain 100% of the people on here will agree with my calculation of the percentile and not your incorrect one.
derek bomar
Posts: 3,722
Apr 17, 2012 9:06pm
that wasn't predictable at allCommander of Awesome;1146018 wrote:More than you pay dynasty moron.
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 17, 2012 9:07pm
haha you didn't address the other points I made..
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Apr 17, 2012 9:07pm
Does your work have a "no pussies who get their asses punked at Ohio University for being a mouthy little bitch" policy? :rolleyes:SportsAndLady;1146312 wrote:BR does your executive recruiting firm have a "no steroids" policy to work there?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Apr 17, 2012 9:08pm
Muhahaha. The hole you dig gets deeper and deeper. We are talking pitchers you dumb fuck. Not players. And what's really incredible, you tried to pull that shit last night....and I had to correct you.lhslep134;1146342 wrote:You are so dumb, and this post is wrong. You have to be a dumbass redneck, that's the only explanation for how ignorant you are.
Just in case you feel the need to look even more stupid, your link on that thread was for fantasy rankings, not quality rankings.
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7547690/mlb-top-100-prospects-2012-mike-trout-bryce-harper-more
In that list, Pomeranz is 50th overally and the 25th listed pitcher. Regardless, he's nowhere close to top 10th perctile, whatever incorrect definition you use.
To the rest of the OC, I'm sorry that I had to waste your time schooling this idiot.
When you get a little older, you will understand the life lesson. When you are proven wrong, accept it...learn from it...grow from it...and move on.
Footwedge's life lessons are free...no need to thank me.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Apr 17, 2012 9:08pm
What are you talking about? What team don't I care about until they are in the playoffs? LOL. This literally makes no sense. Also, what does what page number a thread is on matter? This sounds as dumb as non's successful team-intelligent fan base correlation. Now please continue being one of the site's biggest hypocrites.DeyDurkie5;1146354 wrote:yeah. except we are at page number 245, and the steelers are at 7. How's the syracuse orange, notre dame fighting irish, and steelers doing? Oh wait, you don't care until they are in the playoffs LOL pwnd
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 17, 2012 9:09pm
get your gay fantasy baseball out of this thread footwedge.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 17, 2012 9:09pm
okay so COA I did interpret your post correctly, and I actually agree. I got to watch Luck, Osweiler, and Foles all the time this year and Foles looked at least as good as Tannehill and Weeden so I would be all for him after the 3rd round. I don't think there's a QB worth a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd round pick outside of RGIII/Luck either, which I guess is good if the Browns don't botch their other picks because we can attempt to fill the many holes on our team.
Commander of Awesome
Posts: 23,151
Apr 17, 2012 9:09pm
Took you that long to come up with this fail? I'm not surprised.derek bomar;1146363 wrote:that wasn't predictable at all
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 17, 2012 9:09pm
LOL exactly! thanks for playing buddykiller_ewok;1146369 wrote:What are you talking about? What team don't I care about until they are in the playoffs? LOL. This literally makes no sense. Also, what does what page number a thread is on matter? This sounds as dumb as non's successful team-intelligent fan base correlation. Now please continue being one of the site's biggest hypocrites.
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 17, 2012 9:10pm
No I don't think soBR1986FB;1146365 wrote:Does your work have a "no pussies who get their asses punked at Ohio University for being a mouthy little bitch" policy? :rolleyes:
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Apr 17, 2012 9:10pm
To address your comment about the draft picks, you're expecting a perfect storm which isn't realistic. You are expecting 3+ rookies to come in and make an immediate MAJOR impact (to get them to the playoffs). One possibly, two your lucky but more than that and EVERY card has to fall in place. Highly unlikely. Now with a year or two under their belts I'd be inclined to agree.DeyDurkie5;1146364 wrote:haha you didn't address the other points I made..
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 17, 2012 9:11pm
Does your company like their director to make these types of comments to people?BR1986FB;1146365 wrote:Does your work have a "no pussies who get their asses punked at Ohio University for being a mouthy little bitch" policy? :rolleyes:
DeyDurkie5
Posts: 11,324
Apr 17, 2012 9:11pm
Yes, but you are expecting ONE ROOKIE QB to come in and make a difference, which is even more retarded.BR1986FB;1146375 wrote:To address your comment about the draft picks, you're expecting a perfect storm which isn't realistic. You are expecting 3+ rookies to come in and make an immediate MAJOR impact (to get them to the playoffs). One possibly, two your lucky but more than that and EVERY card has to fall in place. Highly unlikely. Now with a year or two under their belts I'd be inclined to agree.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 17, 2012 9:12pm
I'm no longer responding to failwedge. He is legitimately stupid and has no idea what he's talking about, which is fine when talking about opinion but not a universally accepted thing like math. That's just plain ignorance and borderline mental retardation.
It's just not worth the effort needed to sort through the idiocy.
It's just not worth the effort needed to sort through the idiocy.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Apr 17, 2012 9:12pm
Oh Hell's yeah!!! Steeler on Steeler violence!!!killer_ewok;1146369 wrote: This sounds as dumb as non's successful team-intelligent fan base correlation.
shook_17
Posts: 3,023
Apr 17, 2012 9:13pm
Reps. shut the fuck up bitch.DeyDurkie5;1146354 wrote:yeah. except we are at page number 245, and the steelers are at 7. How's the syracuse orange, notre dame fighting irish, and steelers doing? Oh wait, you don't care until they are in the playoffs LOL pwnd
why isn't anybody talking about the schedule? or maybe i missed it?
F
Footwedge
Posts: 9,265
Apr 17, 2012 9:13pm
lhslep134;1146342 wrote:You are so dumb, and this post is wrong. You have to be a dumbass redneck, that's the only explanation for how ignorant you are.
Just in case you feel the need to look even more stupid, your link on that thread was for fantasy rankings, not quality rankings.
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7547690/mlb-top-100-prospects-2012-mike-trout-bryce-harper-more
In that list, Pomeranz is 50th overally and the 25th listed pitcher. Regardless, he's nowhere close to top 10th perctile, whatever incorrect definition you use.
To the rest of the OC, I'm sorry that I had to waste your time schooling this idiot.
"Listen up kid...percentiles are based on blocks of 100....which I proved in the subsequent post. So I ask you again....what happened to numbers 26 through 100?
Percentiles do not equal percentages...never have...never will. Buy a dictionary and learn".
I'm waiting.......
PS (and the law student claims 6 from the top out of 25 = the 74th percentile) Can't make this stuff up....scroll up and see. LOLOLOL
LSP=severely challenged in math.
lhslep134
Posts: 9,774
Apr 17, 2012 9:14pm
Not much to mention besides it's hard as f*ck. 3rd hardest by opponents winning percentage from last year.shook_17;1146383 wrote:
why isn't anybody talking about the schedule? or maybe i missed it?
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Apr 17, 2012 9:14pm
Yeah, good talk, Durkie. Shame on all 5-10 Steeler fans on this site for not racking up the posts/pages during the offseason. The Steelers pretty much NEVER make a splash in free agency and they're usually drafting late in the 1st round so not as much juicy stuff to post about. Like I said, right up there with non's flawed theory. LOLDeyDurkie5;1146373 wrote:LOL exactly! thanks for playing buddy
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Apr 17, 2012 9:16pm
LOL. Nothing compared to these exchanges on here though. Cleveland fans are goin' in on each other. Damn.BR1986FB;1146380 wrote:Oh Hell's yeah!!! Steeler on Steeler violence!!!
SportsAndLady
Posts: 35,632
Apr 17, 2012 9:16pm
It's the offseason, fuck itkiller_ewok;1146393 wrote:Nothing compared to these exchanges on here though. Cleveland fans are goin' in on each other. Damn.
B
BR1986FB
Posts: 24,104
Apr 17, 2012 9:17pm
Not necessarily. One (current QB) has limited physical limitations while the other doesn't. I'm in the minority but I think Weeden beats McCoy out in a training camp competition.DeyDurkie5;1146377 wrote:Yes, but you are expecting ONE ROOKIE QB to come in and make a difference, which is even more retarded.
I'm ALL onboard with Trent Richardson at 4 and will be kinda pissed if they take Claiborne but ya know what? If they stick with McCoy none of that will matter. Logically one would think that T-Rich would open things up for him, correct. It won't. Teams will key even more on the run, crowding the LOS, and then it's ALL on Colt. Beat me if you can/ I don't see it. A QB with at least a threat of a vertical attack, with Richardson, will open things up a ton.
killer_ewok
Posts: 11,379
Apr 17, 2012 9:17pm
It makes for an entertaining thread. I can't argue with that.SportsAndLady;1146396 wrote:It's the offseason, fuck it