You looking for a biased or unbiased opinion?vball10set;1039658 wrote:This would be a great question for ESPN's SportsNation...I'll shoot Colin an email and see what he thinks
I have just been informed that the crew that worked this game was also a PAC10 crew. They may have been instructed not to call this type of action by their supervisor after this game.WebFire;1039314 wrote:That's kind of weak. Either it is or it isn't.
http://rivals.yahoo.com/video/college-football/Highlights-Giorgio-Tavecchios-Penalty-vs-Oregon-885412
I'm looking for any opinion, just on a national level. For the record, IMO, all opinions are biased in some way (and you do know I was kidding about emailing Cowherd, right?)Sonofanump;1039689 wrote:You looking for a biased or unbiased opinion?
Stonum is an idiot.karen lotz;1039752 wrote:Not sure if our needs its own thread, but Darryl Stonum got a ticket for driving on a revoked license. How does that effect his red shirt? Here I was told taking games away changes behavior.
Of course they are biased. Otherwise they wouldn't be opinions.vball10set;1039747 wrote:I'm looking for any opinion, just on a national level. For the record, IMO, all opinions are biased in some way (and you do know I was kidding about emailing Cowherd, right?)
Been surfing the college officiating forums. The general consensuses was that it was not a catch, but not enough to over turn the call on the field. However, two of the FG's Michigan kicked, the kicker false stared by moving forward before the snap was not called and should have been. Bottom line, the VT coach was an idiot, and is way past his prime.Scarlet_Buckeye;1039635 wrote:It's not just "Scarlet & Gray" nation either tho. Most of the country thinks it was a rip.
That was my point--I wasn't quite sure why sonofanump asked me thatWebFire;1039783 wrote:Of course they are biased. Otherwise they wouldn't be opinions.
His decision on the fake punt was mind boggling, but that's the way he's always coached--and it really bit him on the ass this time.Abe Vigoda;1039800 wrote:Bottom line, the VT coach was an idiot, and is way past his prime.
He Zook'd that call for sure.vball10set;1039806 wrote:His decision on the fake punt was mind boggling, but that's the way he's always coached--and it really bit him on the ass this time.
I haven't heard yet. If he did, I hope no pics get leaked!OneBuckeye;1039948 wrote:Did Brady Hoke take his shirt off?
I also love the Holly Rowe forearm after the game.
Interesting.Abe Vigoda;1039800 wrote:Been surfing the college officiating forums. The general consensuses was that it was not a catch, but not enough to over turn the call on the field. However, two of the FG's Michigan kicked, the kicker false stared by moving forward before the snap was not called and should have been.
At first, I thought it was a run/punt option that we see a lot of now...like the rugby style punt. You know, if it's there take it, if not, then punt.. It seemed to me that the punter just made a bad choice.vball10set;1039806 wrote:His decision on the fake punt was mind boggling, but that's the way he's always coached--and it really bit him on the ass this time.
Abe Vigoda;1039800 wrote:Been surfing the college officiating forums. The general consensuses was that it was not a catch, but not enough to over turn the call on the field. However, two of the FG's Michigan kicked, the kicker false stared by moving forward before the snap was not called and should have been. Bottom line, the VT coach was an idiot, and is way past his prime.
Could very well have been...regardless, it was a bad choice, whoever made it :thumbdown:bigkahuna;1040985 wrote:At first, I thought it was a run/punt option that we see a lot of now...like the rugby style punt. You know, if it's there take it, if not, then punt.. It seemed to me that the punter just made a bad choice.
