sherm03;1031177 wrote:Now go the fuck away you kid-fucking douchebag.

wildcats?

DeyDurkie5;1031179 wrote:wildcats?

How long are you going to cry about infraction points?

LOL @ ND being undefeated if Jimmy Clausen was QB. GTFO.

ND would probably be undefeated with Aaron Rodgers as well. Might as well say Otto Graham since we're throwing hypothetical BS into the mix to make yourself feel better. lolfail on tobias

ccrunner609;1031241 wrote:LOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLLLOOOLLOLOL. Yeah right you nutthugger. Dont start backpeddling now. Even if they do only win 1...you still have them winning 9 games. Thats also a BCS prediction right? Are you gonna predict a BCS bowl? Come on, man up and support your team or GTFOH. I predict a BCS championship for OSU in the next 3 years.

How am I backpeddling?! I think they lose to USC and Oklahoma...with 2 losses coming to either Michigan, Michigan State, or Miami. That's four losses. Now I know you're just a gym teacher, and math isn't really your strong point. But if they play 12 games, and I am saying they lose four...how the fuck am I predicting a 9 win season and a BCS bowl?

I do support my team. And that's great that you are predicting that for OSU. But I'm also realistic, and I don't think ND will be in a BCS game next year. How is that not supporting my team?

ccrunner609;1031260 wrote:Ok so let me get this straight cause your little post of their schedule next year is telling me you are predicting 9 wins. Lose to Ok and USC, just go ahead and man up and take a W vs Miami since as you put it "I am leaning toward a "W". So do they lose to both Michigan schools? If so they win 8 games. If you predict 1 win in either game then they win 9 and that is a BCS prediction.

So what is it? Do they beat Miami and MSU? They sure arent beating Michigan.

My God...you are the dumbest person ever. How is this so hard for you? Let's try it again.

Losses to USC and Oklahoma. Toss up games against Michigan, Michigan State, and Miami...of those three, I think they lose two. Four losses. 8-4 season.

Jesus you're an idiot.

How is 9 wins an automatic BCS? Every team this year in one of those games has 10 wins at least.

ccrunner609;1031278 wrote:Dont you know about the ND clause?

You mean the one that says ANY team that ranks in the top 14 and has 9 wins is eligible?

ccrunner609;1031278 wrote:Dont you know about the ND clause?

Do you know the Notre Dame clause? Because the only ND clause is that if they finish in the top 8 they get a BCS bid. Otherwise, they fall into the same at-large possibility as anyone else...9 wins and in the top 14 and you are eligible ​to be selected as an at-large.

Yea, we have to be in the top 8. Having 9 wins doesn't guarantee you that. Especially with your "BTW....that schedule isnt tough." comment. I mean if you're right, then our strength of schedule will be drastically reduced by the computer. We'd be lucky to be top 10 with that kind of schedule in your eyes.

I guess I'll post this again, without calling ccrunner a pedophile. In fairness he makes that apparent without us having to say it:

Do you know how fucking tiring it is having to explain the same shit to you over and over?

Any man with a modicum of football knowledge can tell you that the problem with Notre Dame this year was 100% quarterback play. If Jimmy Clausen as this team's quarterback they'd be undefeated.

Tommy Rees was a mediocre three-star recruit, and against athletic defenses (USC '10, USC '11, Stanford '11, FSU '11) he has played against five-star talent and gotten whooped big time.

The recruiting projections were not off, in fact they were very on point and this game proved it yet again. I saw exactly what I expected to see today.

As for if Jimmy Clausen being the quarterback they'd be undefeated, yeah I stand by it. It's a no-brainer too.

Notre Dame's backfield had two guys who will be playing in the NFL, a receiving corp with two all-Americans, an offensive line that went two months without giving up a sack, and a very reliable defense. They also had a quarterback who was a three-star recruit by Weis who has about as much arm strength as I do and shits his pants when there's the possibility of contact. With an above average QB, Notre Dame would have won ten games (beaten USF and Michigan), with a stud like Jimmy Clausen they'd be playing LSU right now. Do I think they'd be the #2 team in the country..NO. That's not what I said. Try to comprehend what I'm typing.

All of you Notre Dame haters should get your punches in now, because when Kelly has his athletes and quarterback to roll with, it'll get interesting. guys like Deontay Greenberry, Davaris Daniels, and Everett Golson are going to make you forget the joke that Tommy Rees is pretty damn quickly. If Kelly gets Neal of Agholor look out.

A bit of an upgrade from Tommy:

[video=youtube;Wcd0CED1yKI][/video]

ccrunner609;1031502 wrote:this is awesome.

"I don't know how to construct an intelligent response" would have sufficed.

LOL tobias is delusional...Notre Dame will be 8-4 next year, if not worse, regardless of their qb.

DeyDurkie5;1031506 wrote:LOL tobias is delusional...Notre Dame will be 8-4 next year, if not worse, regardless of their qb.

Am I delusional if I agree with what you just said?

Another comprehension fail for durrrrrrrrrrrrrrkie.

ccrunner609;1031515 wrote:Yes now we have the usual "top recruiting class" bullshit. Its getting better after every post

Holy hell you are one ignorant mother fucker.

ccrunner609;1031515 wrote:Yes now we have the usual "top recruiting class" bullshit. Its getting better after every post

Where is any one other then you saying they have top recruiting classes? Saying they have some talent is true. Saying they have top classes every year is wrong and easily disproved.

Tobias Fünke;1031523 wrote:Holy hell you are one ignorant mother fucker.

Add toby fuckhead to the list of MAD ND fans. Hahahahhahahahah!!!!!1!1!!1!111!!!1!one

ccrunner609;1031528 wrote:Are you not reading what you are posting? You look as smart as the bottom of my shoe

You've demonstrated over the years a considerable lack of cognitive ability, I question if you can even read what I posted. Please just shut the fuck up.