merv;1030735 wrote:Serious question... Is Kelly's seat getting warmer?
sherm03;1030682 wrote:Was sleeper's ND thread ban just a one year thing? I did not know that. Looks like this forum will be completely unbearable again.
sleeper;1030690 wrote:It was. It's suppose to be January 1st, but I can't resist LOL
2kool4skool;1030962 wrote:Notre Dame is so shitty lol
Looks like you said never, sleeper. That doesn't mean one year.sleeper;1030690 wrote:I would take that bet.
ND 6 wins or less, a thread must be created by an ND fan on this forum with the title "ND is terrible, sleeper is right"
The text of the thread must be "Bring back Weis, at least he gave us a "close loss" to USC"
ND 7 wins or more, I will never post on any thread with Notre Dame in the title.
Any takers?
You really expect him to follow thru on a bet? smhsherm03;1030968 wrote:Found the post...
Looks like you said never, sleeper. That doesn't mean one year.
You can get off this thread now.
If he didn't act like such an idiot, most people probably wouldn't have cared and let him post on the threads again. But even the mods have been enforcing this bet, which makes me laugh because it makes sleeper QQ.Skyhook79;1030978 wrote:You really expect him to follow thru on a bet? smh
It doesn't take much to make sleeper QQ. Good for the Mods.sherm03;1030982 wrote:If he didn't act like such an idiot, most people probably wouldn't have cared and let him post on the threads again. But even the mods have been enforcing this bet, which makes me laugh because it makes sleeper QQ.
Do you know how fucking tiring it is having to explain the same shit to you over and over?ccrunner609;1030673 wrote:How could a team with the so called top recruiting class every year be this bad? THink if they would of actually had to play a good team in a bowl game?
If he honors this bet, I better get my iPadSkyhook79;1030978 wrote:You really expect him to follow thru on a bet? smh
vball10set;1031058 wrote:If I missed it on this thread, I apologize, but what was the nature of Floyd's injury? I have to believe it was horrific if it kept a senior leader, a player given numerous chances by the coaching staff after a couple of brushes with the law, off the field when his team needed him most. He had his helmet on until the end of the game, which usually indicates a readiness to return, so I'm wondering if it was a coaches/trainers decision to not let him re-enter the game?
SportsAndLady;1031136 wrote:Clausen the QB Notre dame goes undefeated?
LOL!!
/karen lotz'd
karen lotz;1031137 wrote:Upper body injury is all that was said after the game. Happened on the juggling TD catch.
ccrunner609;1031143 wrote:He knew they were losing and he quit on his team.
killer_ewok;1031144 wrote:I thought they mentioned the hip flexor too? In any event, it sucks that he couldn't return. Rees would've just thrown it directly to a 'Nole if Floyd was in there anyways.
I definitely didn't predict that anywhere. I did mistype, and meant to say they would lose two out of the three toss up games. But I don't see how I predicted any sort of BCS birth when I then typed this...ccrunner609;1031164 wrote:Yeah you did. You said that you are "leaning on a W" vs Miami and that they would win 2 of the toss up games. That would ammount to 10 wins. Do your own math. You are predicting 10 wins. When you do that you are predicting a BCS bowl game. Would you want a wager on that?
Now go the fuck away you kid-fucking douchebag.sherm03;1030756 wrote:and ends up with four losses again next year. Sure hope they prove me wrong though.