Steel Valley Football;1002225 wrote:1) I never said it was relevant. I only asked why it was so dangerous. You were the one who first claimed it was dangerous because of his blind spot which makes no sense. It makes no sense because side-by-side cars aren't in the other's blind spot and also because, with the way he initially worded it, he was not in either of the side-by-side cars.
2) Don't tell me what I said. Let's go back and quote what was said.
The way he originally wrote it, the only place he could be is behind the two side by side cars. That, or not on the highway at all and speaking hypothetically; which is fine. He then came back and added more details which changed what was originally wrote. Then thats when you started thinking you were all cool and right about everything and being a dicck. Now, he may have MEANT something other than what he originally wrote but that's not my fault.
Since you seem like you want a debate, that is. So, go.
1. normally if you are paying attention to the road infront of you and checking your rear view mirror(which i would say you check more than your side mirrors), you wouldnt see a car next to you, its out of your peripheral vision. plus like i said earlier, if there is an obstacle in the road and you have to swerve or change lanes, with a car next to you, you cant or you would cause an accident...making it dangerous.
2.doesnt matter where you thought he was when he originally wrote it, that is my point. like i said, that is irrelevant. he was just talking about the situation in general, he wasnt telling a specific story about himself.
</SPAN>
