I agree, that's a good way to look at it.rrfan;1338064 wrote:Orrville is down for the first time in a long time and people are enjoying it from all the WCAL schools. I take that as a compliment.
Like AllOhio said........kinda like the Yankees.
I agree, that's a good way to look at it.rrfan;1338064 wrote:Orrville is down for the first time in a long time and people are enjoying it from all the WCAL schools. I take that as a compliment.
I'm not sure i would agree with this years Orrville team beating any of these WCAL teams. We were not mentally tough enough to whoop our way out of a wet paper bag! Hopefully next year is different! That loss to Norwayne dented this program and it did not recover. Talent Shmalent! I agree with most posts as it starts and ends in the weight room and being disciplined enough to put the work in off the field! Obviously this years team wasn't that!!! This team was out toughed, out disciplined, and out conditioned and that was obvious on Friday nights!!!AllOhio;1337999 wrote:Don't know if they would've been "just fine" but that's just my opinion. Also I'm pretty sure we would've beat Waynedale, Rittman, Dalton, Chippewa and likely Smithville this past season...as I see it, would've been at least 5-3 in WCAL. Again, my opinion.
Or like Duke !BRF;1338244 wrote:I agree, that's a good way to look at it.
Like AllOhio said........kinda like the Yankees.
Troll King;1338347 wrote:Or like Duke !
I think we can all agree...we were out-everythinged last season. Time to move on now.Red Rider Nation;1338247 wrote:I'm not sure i would agree with this years Orrville team beating any of these WCAL teams. We were not mentally tough enough to whoop our way out of a wet paper bag! Hopefully next year is different! That loss to Norwayne dented this program and it did not recover. Talent Shmalent! I agree with most posts as it starts and ends in the weight room and being disciplined enough to put the work in off the field! Obviously this years team wasn't that!!! This team was out toughed, out disciplined, and out conditioned and that was obvious on Friday nights!!!
Orrville was a playoff team. Putting down your own team to make you feel better about losing to a county team?....that's sad.Troll King;1337902 wrote:I agree it took Norwayne's greatest team ever to defeat an average Orrville team. We were good that year but not great . we have had far better teams in the past , I wonder how Norwayne would've fared against some of those teams.
I'm a county fan and get no real enjoyment out of Orrvilles recent woes....now watching you guys cannibalize each other, that's another matter:laugh:rrfan;1338064 wrote:Orrville is down for the first time in a long time and people are enjoying it from all the WCAL schools. I take that as a compliment.
The Yankees are a baseball team and have won 27 championships.AllOhio;1338109 wrote:Most definately...kinda like the Yankees, people either love'm or hate'm but you gotta respect'm. I think that's where we sit here in Orrville. I gues we gotta put ourselves in their shoes...imagine if all you read about was how good the Riders are every season. Kind of overshadows all the other area programs, until the past 2 years. That everyone loves it when we lose is absolutely a compliment!
a healthy choice....repsAllOhio;1339568 wrote: Time to move on now.
Red Rider Nation;1338247 wrote:I'm not sure i would agree with this years Orrville team beating any of these WCAL teams. We were not mentally tough enough to whoop our way out of a wet paper bag! Hopefully next year is different! That loss to Norwayne dented this program and it did not recover. Talent Shmalent! I agree with most posts as it starts and ends in the weight room and being disciplined enough to put the work in off the field! Obviously this years team wasn't that!!! This team was out toughed, out disciplined, and out conditioned and that was obvious on Friday nights!!!
I think you are the only one arguing the talent thing-we all agree we were less talented-we ALL agree with that! Were we less talented then the 9 teams we lost to? I struggle with that one but maybe so-judging by the year the basketball team is about to have I may buy that argument!!! I mean a 32 point loss to West Holmes??? Come on now! Maybe it's Smuckers fault again!RedRider1;1339929 wrote:We all know the answer..i'm tired of seeing the claim that we had a dip in talent dismissed as inconsequential. Like talent has NOTHING at all to do with winning games.
It's a bad argument and only done to prop up the position that its all on the coach.
With that said, the coaching must not have mattered as much as one percieves, yet, the coaches recieved much honor for the victories. So now, with "marginal/little talent" do you also have "little coaching"? Does that "jive" with you?RedRider1;1339790 wrote:And out talented too. it was pretty obvious, no?
Did we lose a at least 1 game (Triway) based on coaching? Sure. Did we lose a few (Clear Fork, Madison) on turnovers/mental mistakes? Yeah.
Did we lose most (Copley, Lex, Senior, WH, Ash, Wooster) b/c we just weren't the more talented team? Yep.
Talent matters, especially in high school sports. How many Red Rider teams in the 80 & 90's won games on talent & little else? Too many to count. Yet somehow now talent doesn't matter & it's all on coaching? Doesn't jive with me...sorry.
AllOhio;1340344 wrote:Great point Old Rider. Anyone who doesn't think talent is the major factor in all athletics should not be posting! We are down and, conversely, programs such as W. Holmes, Norwayne, Madison, etc. are at an all-time high as far as talent. Another good example is Clear Fork... recently had a couple great classes who won their 1st ever OCC championship. We see what's happened since.
I think we have all been around sports at all levels to know that coaches get too much credit when they win and too much blame when they lose. Fact.Series62;1340342 wrote:With that said, the coaching must not have mattered as much as one percieves, yet, the coaches recieved much honor for the victories. So now, with "marginal/little talent" do you also have "little coaching"? Does that "jive" with you?
I don't think that is a new problem, but a continuation of a problem. Some will always get mixed up with it and have for a long time. The problem I see is the parents not doing what they need to do to stop their child. 5knots is right not enough parenting going on.5knots;1340441 wrote:I knew your son Series and can tell by what type of a person he was that you were one of those parents/guardians who took the time to be a parent. Knowing where your son was, who he was with, and more importantly WHAT they were doing. Our biggest challenge going forward as a community is more parents like that. It has nothing to do with race or economics it has to do with being a parent. My ear is to the sidewalk in town as much as it can be and my take is we have a bigger problem with alcohol and drugs being ingested by our youth than any of us would like to think. Biggest problem is parents afraid to say NO. that may seem trivial to many of you but you would be surprised at how few parents hold fast to a 21 year old drinking law. Once that line is crossed, the party rolls on with kids. Wish I knew how to fix it?
I wish this was the answer RR1 but I fear not. I certainly would support such a program but our issues with weed and beer are as much a problem with the 2 parent household (if not more!) than with the single or no parent household. time for folks to stop looking the other way. It is not a popular stance to have but if your friends have underage kids drinking at their house it should be brought up....and I am talking about College kids and their friends. 21 is 21...I do not believe their are special exemptions just because you go to college?RedRider1;1340536 wrote:5knots has mentioned it before..a mentoring program. That is what's needed.
Too many kids growing up with ZERO positive role models to look up to. Entertainers & athletes have more influence on our kids than parents, grandparents & guardians. How sad is that?
Tired of reading the paper about former Red Rider greats finding trouble with the law.
But when does hand-holding stop & personal responsibility start?
My support for anyone attempting to help guide our youth on the "straight and narrow" never has and never will waiver. It seems that if some of us on this site don't agree with coach Davault from the football standpoint, we're made out to "hate" him! I think RRN and TK have said this too many times already.5knots;1340441 wrote:I knew your son Series and can tell by what type of a person he was that you were one of those parents/guardians who took the time to be a parent. Knowing where your son was, who he was with, and more importantly WHAT they were doing. Our biggest challenge going forward as a community is more parents like that. It has nothing to do with race or economics it has to do with being a parent. My ear is to the sidewalk in town as much as it can be and my take is we have a bigger problem with alcohol and drugs being ingested by our youth than any of us would like to think. Biggest problem is parents afraid to say NO. that may seem trivial to many of you but you would be surprised at how few parents hold fast to a 21 year old drinking law. Once that line is crossed, the party rolls on with kids. Wish I knew how to fix it?