vball10set;983967 wrote:
I think you are confused that was you during the Jim Tressel investigation.
vball10set;983967 wrote:
lol..actually, I had the scarlet and gray glasses off for that mess....and sorry, hook, I just coudn't resist after Big Gain's postSkyhook79;983972 wrote:I think you are confused that was you during the Jim Tressel investigation.
You don't think it's this way at most schools?Big Gain;983796 wrote:Paterno and Penn State's former chief disciplinarian Vicky Triponey, the Standards and Conduct Officer, clashed repeatedly when football players broke rules and got in trouble. Paterno would always tell her he knew better than she did how to discipline his players. All other coaches respected her position and would work with her when it came to disciplining their athletes. Paterno demanding that he and his players be treated differently than any other coach and athlete at Penn State caused Tripony to "resign" her positoion.
Those who don't think Paterno was the most powerful person in Happy Valley and had the knowledge and power to stop Sandusky more than 10 years ago look like an ostrich.
I have no doubt the head coach at the major players hold a lot of sway in making decisions about discipline, but I'd also bet few of those universities have a culture that is as insular and inbred as State College and PSU. It's that closed atmosphere that gave Paterno his power, and it also allowed a predator to roam freely for decades, despite whispers and allegations that I'm betting we'll find out were fairly well known.WebFire;984001 wrote:You don't think it's this way at most schools?
One of the new alleged victims in the sexual harassment case against former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky told a grand jury that Sandusky's wife ignored his screams for help while Sandusky raped him in the basement of their home.
Sandusky rearrested in Pennsylvania
The young man, identified in the new complaint as Victim No. 9, who is now 18 years old, said in his testimony that Sandusky attempted to rape him at least 16 times, sometimes successfully.
Not many 11 and 12 year olds have the ability or power to dictate how the spend their time.mucalum49;1006089 wrote:^^ I know these children were underprivileged but at what point do you stop going around this guy?
Based on violating what NCAA rules?ccrunner609;1006144 wrote:I cant see how this doesnt get the NCAA to investigate PSU and offer up the death penalty
queencitybuckeye;1007106 wrote:Based on violating what NCAA rules?
I think the answer to the question remains to be seen. It's not like the NCAA needs a reason to do a little digging.Midstate01;1009694 wrote:Failure to monitor??
A MAJOR MAJOR "Lack Of Institutional Control" at the highest levels. This will end up being THE BIGGEST cover up in NCAA history. There will end up being dozens of coaches and administrators that knew about Sandusky's proclivity and did nothing to stop the animal.queencitybuckeye;1007106 wrote:Based on violating what NCAA rules?
A MAJOR MAJOR "Lack Of Institutional Control" at the highest levels. This will end up being THE BIGGEST cover up in NCAA history. There will end up being dozens of coaches and administrators that knew about Sandusky's proclivity and did nothing to stop the animal, all just to protect Penn State's brand name.queencitybuckeye;1007106 wrote:Based on violating what NCAA rules?
dtdtim;981539 wrote:I disagree here. I don't by any means think the NCAA is going to hammer Penn State but I don't think they're going to leave Happy Valley without giving them something. Even the NCAA, as big of a fraud as it is, knows that even the most casual follower of the USC/OSU/PSU scandals would be alarmed to see punishments handed to USC and OSU while PSU gets off scot-free. It might not technically be 100% sports related but it is enough to accuse them of LOIC and enough for the NCAA to go in and start digging.
It would be a PR disaster of the type of level that PSU has perpetuated for itself if the NCAA doesn't act in some way.
Can someone clarify this for me? The NCAA isn't a federal court and they pretty much have free reign to conduct themselves and punish as they see fit for what they feel is wrong. That means they don't need a reason to investigate any school. They just can, right? If a school doesn't like it, they don't have to be a member of the NCAA, but the legal options for schools that disagree with NCAA findings are not much?
It seems that, whether they like it or not or even think it's fair, Penn State just has to deal with it and cooperate.