fish82;849832 wrote:"Debunked as junk," because Media Matters doesn't like a couple of their funding sources? You get funnier by the day.

How about the Harvard study? Crap too I suppose, at least compared to that bastion of centrism, Pew Research. :rolleyes:

Bigdogg;850574 wrote:Speaking of which, Plunderbund was name best political blog in Ohio.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/the-fixs-best-state-based-political-blogs-2011-edition/2011/08/02/gIQApaWvpI_blog.html

queencitybuckeye;850584 wrote:The blogs listed were the result a simple popularity contest, which simply proves that you're not the only numbnut that reads the sophomoric and soporific POS.

Footwedge;850419 wrote:I have listened to him maybe 3 times on the last 5 years. I listened to him every day for years....back in the late 80's...early 90's. The man is a liar. A fraud....a hypocrite to the nth degree. His show is a propaganda machine. His show is popular because of it's shock value.

Bigdogg;850574 wrote:Speaking of which, Plunderbund was name best political blog in Ohio.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/the-fixs-best-state-based-political-blogs-2011-edition/2011/08/02/gIQApaWvpI_blog.html

Bigdogg;850581 wrote:Laughing boy then should actually read what was being studied. The two studies were not even attempting to measure the same thing. You should learn that it is better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt fishie

fish82;850734 wrote:Now you're just talking out of your ass again. I'm fully aware the two studies weren't measuring the same thing. The fact that you followed up your "Debunked as junk" faceplant with something not even related to the post being discussed pretty much speaks for itself. Carry on.

Bigdogg;850740 wrote:. Any study you find that says FOX news is the least bias just confirms what most people think of you on here, you are a freaking.........

Footwedge;850441 wrote:When Rush clamored that Magic Johnson had to be gay, or had to have had gay sex iimmediately after announcing he was HIV positive, did you call him out for it? This was at a time that was well past the well documented scientific proof that heterosexuals were being infected. Is that the kind of guy you like to listen to?

The man spend years and years preaching the "throw em all in jail" rhetoric when talking about drug offenders. All the while he was illicitly obtaining controlled substances fron his fuggin nanny. Is that the kind of guy that you would like to listen to?

The guy spent days upon days upon days mocking one H Ross Perot and his big ears....inspite of the fact that he was the first to run for the president based on old school conservative fiscal policies. Is that the "talent loaned fron Gawd" you bow to? Do you espouse Rushboy's statement and I quote VERBATIM..."the national debt is no big deal". Should the self described leader of "advanced conservative studies" be pedestaled for such shameless remarks?

The man on several occasions....particularly in the mid nineties... espoused Keynesian economics as being "no big deal" to his bastion of followers....again in the early to mid nineties. Is that someone you would call your maharushi in regards to the teacher of "advanced conservative studies"?

Or how about the hawkish of all hawks....that any war was a good war.....declared or not declared by the Congress as the Constitution dictates....yet skirted his own duty of fighting for his own country....when selective conscription was the law of the land.....getting deferments excusing him from serving and possibly dying in Vietnam back in the 60's.....from of all things...a mild cyst on his ass? Is that someone you bow down to as a "true conservative" patriot?

Or the man who, inspite of numerous official declassified documents from several of our intel departments stating that Al Quada had no ties to Saddam Hussein....and he called all the reports "left winged wacko news"...or the biggest of whoppers when no WMD was found...stating that these wMd's somehow were contrabanded to Jordan.....is that someone you would believe...... even one lousy stinking sentence spewed on his daily show?

Or the man who mimicked Michael J Fox...by shaking unshamelessly at.....downplaying the insidious disease of Parkinson's....is that a man you would want your kids to emulate?

And really, that's just the tip of the iceberg. The man is a very sick and demented individual....who has bastardized what true conservatism represents and what true conservatives stand up for. If those 20 million daily listeners want to pound their puds to this guy....have at it. The other 280 million people have seen through his wretched debauchery.

Independent Bill Maher educates the lemmings here....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M91wDBM6Krc

Bigdogg;850740 wrote:Did or did you not imply that the Harvard study backed up the UCLA study? Pay attention, the post has to do with media bias. You are going to get sent to the kid table soon. Any study you find that says FOX news is the least bias just confirms what most people think of you on here, you are a freaking.........

Bigdogg;850647 wrote:

fish82;850757 wrote:The I implied no such thing. I merely cited it as a more well-known example...also unequivocally proving that bias exists. You're starting to do that "babble incoherently" thing you always do when you've painted yourself into a corner.

fish82;850988 wrote:Refresh my memory...what "facts" did you point out again?

Bigdogg;851128 wrote: