WebFire;842287 wrote:Apparently you have to read this thread with scarlet colored glasses to see what it's about.
Not really. It's pretty easy to understand the article and the issue. Not sure why you can't get it?
WebFire;842287 wrote:Apparently you have to read this thread with scarlet colored glasses to see what it's about.
WebFire;842282 wrote:Wow.
SportsAndLady;842292 wrote:Lol why in the hell would we care about.that??? You're completely missing the point...its about one vacated season being listed as vacated and another vacated season not.
SportsAndLady;842292 wrote:Lol why in the hell would we care about.that??? You're completely missing the point...its about one vacated season being listed as vacated and another vacated season not.
SportsAndLady;842297 wrote:HAHA wow is right--you really can't answer the question!
Vacated wins don't matter, remember? So why the whining?
karen lotz;842300 wrote:I understand that its about the different vacated seasons. Many of you have said that the vacated wins mean exactly dick, so why does it matter what happens with other vacated seasons? They all mean the same whether they are listed on espn.com or not.
lhslep134;842308 wrote:I don't understand why ESPN having a bias, IF they have a bias, matters at all. Who cares? It's not like they impact anything of any real significance, do they?
LJ;842302 wrote:But what matters is why report one and not the others?
karen lotz;842314 wrote:They did report that the other teams vacated wins, they didn't update tables on the website from in some cases 6 or 7 seasons ago. If you don't care, why do you care?
They also have OSU on a 6 game winning streak, right? I can only imagine the outrage from Buckeye haters around the country over that error!!!
karen lotz;842325 wrote:If it was something that meant more than vacated wins, it wouldn't be. Like everyone has said on here already, people know what happened in everyone of those vacated wins. Send ESPN an email and include the elevenwarriors link.
LJ;842327 wrote:So, having inaccurate records is ok with you in this case?
karen lotz;842331 wrote:No! I am outraged!!! :mad:
God damn you are a douche.
LJ;842319 wrote:So the "Worldwide Leader in Sports" having inaccurate records listed on their informational website is just A-OK with you?
SportsAndLady;842334 wrote:Karen and web spend more time arguing with buckeye fans than they spend time actually following their own teams I think. Do you guys just get off to that or what?
SportsAndLady;842334 wrote:Karen and web spend more time arguing with buckeye fans than they spend time actually following their own teams I think. Do you guys just get off to that or what?
lhslep134;842340 wrote:Yeah. As an educated sports fan I know those wins were vacated, so who cares?
lhslep134;842340 wrote:Yeah. As an educated sports fan I know those wins were vacated, so who cares?
LJ;842347 wrote:I dunno, I would think the "worldwide leader in sports" would have accurate information on their website.
failkaren lotz;842349 wrote:Why don't LJ or S&L respond to you? They must get off on arguing with non Buckeye fans!
Have you listened to their announcers in the past 5 years?LJ;842319 wrote:So the "Worldwide Leader in Sports" having inaccurate records listed on their informational website is just A-OK with you?
karen lotz;842349 wrote:Why don't LJ or S&L respond to you? They must get off on arguing with non Buckeye fans!