OSU vacates 2010 wins

Home ▸ Archive ▸ College Sports ▸ OSU vacates 2010 wins
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:04 PM
Smart decision to be proactive, but I would think it's still going to cost them some scholarships.

It may spare them the postseason ban if they are lucky, IMO.
Jul 8, 2011 1:04pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:07 PM
Vacating wins has no affect on anything but the record books, I imagine a few schollies will be gone as well.
Jul 8, 2011 1:07pm
P

Prescott

Senior Member

2,569 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:19 PM
Thank you, Jim Tressel.
Jul 8, 2011 1:19pm
Tiger2003's avatar

Tiger2003

Kill or be Killed

15,421 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:23 PM
Im just ready for this shit to be over with.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I997 using Tapatalk
Jul 8, 2011 1:23pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:24 PM
Good.

Now we can move on and continue to win football games and set the standard for excellence in the classroom. We're still 100000x the program ND/Michigan/Random SEC team will ever be.
Jul 8, 2011 1:24pm
thedynasty1998's avatar

thedynasty1998

Senior Member

6,844 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:25 PM
What a freaking joke. Vacate wins and that is all? Maybe if they would have fired Tressel. But to allow him to retire and pay him, and then try to say you disassociated is as pathetic as Tressel's original presser.
Jul 8, 2011 1:25pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:26 PM
thedynasty1998;824680 wrote:What a freaking joke. Vacate wins and that is all? Maybe if they would have fired Tressel. But to allow him to retire and pay him, and then try to say you disassociated is as pathetic as Tressel's original presser.

That is all? The NCAA still has to make a ruling. There is more to come.
Jul 8, 2011 1:26pm
OneBuckeye's avatar

OneBuckeye

Senior Member

5,888 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:29 PM
se-alum;824668 wrote:Vacating wins has no affect on anything but the record books, I imagine a few schollies will be gone as well.

I don't. This had nothing to do with recruiting. None should be lost.
Jul 8, 2011 1:29pm
BigAppleBuckeye's avatar

BigAppleBuckeye

Senior Member

2,935 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:30 PM
I am seeing on all the sites that OSU is vacating "2010 wins" ... does that include the Sugar Bowl (in 2011)? Can't find a straight answer yet.
Jul 8, 2011 1:30pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:31 PM
BigAppleBuckeye;824685 wrote:I am seeing on all the sites that OSU is vacating "2010 wins" ... does that include the Sugar Bowl (in 2011)? Can't find a straight answer yet.

Yes. First line of the story on ESPN...
Ohio State has vacated all of its football wins from the 2010 season, including its 2011 Allstate Sugar Bowl victory.
Jul 8, 2011 1:31pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:32 PM
I believe it does include the 2011 sugar bowl.

I don't expect any further punishment and would be absolutely shocked if any additional punishment includes a bowl ban. Maybe a few scholarships will be lost, but we'll be playing in a bowl game, and likely it will be for a championship(which the haters will be pissed about because their team will be playing in the Upstairs Medical College Bowl sponsored by Toilet Paper Inc, and Papa Johns).
Jul 8, 2011 1:32pm
sleeper's avatar

sleeper

Legend

27,879 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:33 PM
thedynasty1998;824680 wrote:I'm a freaking joke.

Fixed.
Jul 8, 2011 1:33pm
BigAppleBuckeye's avatar

BigAppleBuckeye

Senior Member

2,935 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:35 PM
wildcats20;824688 wrote:Yes. First line of the story on ESPN...

Yes, I see that now, when I checked the first time it wasn't there.

My first reaction was "Why would OSU voluntarily do this?" ... but then reality set in: this is just the beginning, particularly if OSU is doing this as a token gesture to the NCAA. I wish I would share sleeper's optimism here, but I am feeling the polar opposite way ...
Jul 8, 2011 1:35pm
wildcats20's avatar

wildcats20

In ROY I Trust!!

27,794 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:41 PM
You will almost always see self-imposed sanctions in situations like this. I am not surprised at all.
Jul 8, 2011 1:41pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:44 PM
sleeper;824689 wrote:I believe it does include the 2011 sugar bowl.

I don't expect any further punishment and would be absolutely shocked if any additional punishment includes a bowl ban. Maybe a few scholarships will be lost, but we'll be playing in a bowl game, and likely it will be for a championship(which the haters will be pissed about because their team will be playing in the Upstairs Medical College Bowl sponsored by Toilet Paper Inc, and Papa Johns).
Seriously?
Jul 8, 2011 1:44pm
stroups's avatar

stroups

Senior Member

3,223 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:47 PM
I expect the NCAA to reduce some scholarships but I don't really expect a bowl ban. I kind of wish we would of imposed 3 less schollys for 3 years just to set the tone. It would be retarded for us to self impose a 1 year bowl ban considering that would probably be the max we get.
Jul 8, 2011 1:47pm
BigAppleBuckeye's avatar

BigAppleBuckeye

Senior Member

2,935 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:47 PM
wildcats20;824697 wrote:You will almost always see self-imposed sanctions in situations like this. I am not surprised at all.

Agreed, but was surprised by vacating the bowl win, as the NCAA allowed those players to play that game.
Jul 8, 2011 1:47pm
karen lotz's avatar

karen lotz

TuTu Train

22,284 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:47 PM
myguythetorg the torg
OSU vacates wins and puts itself on probation. Anyone buying this as final punishment? I cant wait 2 take calls from the kool aid drinkers
Jul 8, 2011 1:47pm
ts1227's avatar

ts1227

Senior Member

12,319 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:48 PM
Hb31187;824699 wrote:Seriously?

Look at who wrote it.
Jul 8, 2011 1:48pm
Automatik's avatar

Automatik

Senior Member

14,632 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:51 PM
I'm hoping for a bowl ban only.
Jul 8, 2011 1:51pm
Hb31187's avatar

Hb31187

Senior Member

8,534 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:52 PM
ts1227;824705 wrote:Look at who wrote it.

Lol, noted
Jul 8, 2011 1:52pm
ernest_t_bass's avatar

ernest_t_bass

12th Son of the Lama

24,984 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:53 PM
I don't think the NCAA will issue a bowl ban, nor do I think the all-mighty BCS will allow it. The Ohio State Buckeyes are one of the best, if not THE best traveling football fan bases in all of college football.
Jul 8, 2011 1:53pm
se-alum's avatar

se-alum

The Biggest Boss

13,948 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:55 PM
BigAppleBuckeye;824693 wrote:Yes, I see that now, when I checked the first time it wasn't there.

My first reaction was "Why would OSU voluntarily do this?" ... but then reality set in: this is just the beginning, particularly if OSU is doing this as a token gesture to the NCAA. I wish I would share sleeper's optimism here, but I am feeling the polar opposite way ...
I don't expect much more. There were alot of media outlets spewing allegations, and NONE of it was proven. Tressel and Pryor are gone, and the 2010 season is gone, other than a couple of schollies, I don't see much else happening.
Jul 8, 2011 1:55pm
LJ's avatar

LJ

Senior Member

16,351 posts
Jul 8, 2011 1:55 PM
BigAppleBuckeye;824702 wrote:Agreed, but was surprised by vacating the bowl win, as the NCAA allowed those players to play that game.

I'm surprised too. I think it is just the university saying "we don't want any of this dirtyness" trying to lessen any blows even further. I don't think the NCAA would have forced them to vacate the Sugar Bowl.
Jul 8, 2011 1:55pm