robj55
Posts: 9,511
Sep 11, 2011 3:50pm
yeah the line has been badpnhasbeen;892040 wrote:Bears had so much immediate penetration on the two point
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 3:52pm
Chad Pennington and Matt Ryan have traded bodies. Its comical how many times hes checked down
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Sep 11, 2011 3:53pm
How was Atlanta the #1 seed again? Ryan looks scared, their O-Line is terrible, and they are even making the Bears offense look good.
Two more sacks for the Bears, Peppers is a beast.
Two more sacks for the Bears, Peppers is a beast.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Sep 11, 2011 3:54pm
He has no time and no one is getting open obviously.Hb31187;892052 wrote:Chad Pennington and Matt Ryan have traded bodies. Its comical how many times hes checked down
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 3:55pm
You have 2 big physical Wrs and a Huge TE. at least give them a chance to get a ballrobj55;892064 wrote:He has no time and no one is getting open obviously.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Sep 11, 2011 3:57pm
and throw int's? I don't think you want that. He has no time to go through his reads at all.Hb31187;892069 wrote:You have 2 big physical Wrs and a Huge TE. at least give them a chance to get a ball
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 3:58pm
Throwin an INT goin down the field. Or throwing 3 straight dump passes for 2 yards and punting. The end result is the same
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Sep 11, 2011 4:00pm
you would be just as mad with an int, even more soHb31187;892082 wrote:Throwin an INT goin down the field. Or throwing 3 straight dump passes for 2 yards and punting. The end result is the same
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 4:02pm
If the game was close? Hell yeah I would be. Down 18 what do you have to lose by taking a shot or 2?
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Sep 11, 2011 4:03pm
From what i've seen the receivers are getting no separation at all, completely locked down.Hb31187;892102 wrote:If the game was close? Hell yeah I would be. Down 18 what do you have to lose by taking a shot or 2?
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 4:06pm
This is beyond pathetic
chicago510
Posts: 5,728
Sep 11, 2011 4:21pm
Big win for my Bears, needed a big time performance after that debacle in the NFC title game.
Bears D-line gives teams trouble and allows their LBs to get into coverage.
Bears D-line gives teams trouble and allows their LBs to get into coverage.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Sep 11, 2011 4:46pm
The Chargers special teams basically single-handedly kept them out of the playoffs last season, so of course they come out and start this year off by giving up a 103 yard kick return TD to Percy Harvin on the opening kickoff.
Also, Killa Cam with a 77 yard pass TD to Steve Smith.
Also, Killa Cam with a 77 yard pass TD to Steve Smith.
bradmaynard
Posts: 277
Sep 11, 2011 5:52pm
I think Atlanta will end up alright this year. I'm a pretty firm believer that they are slightly better than the Saints. I'm pretty excited to see the post game articles after this one for the Bears, especially after Bill Barnwell on Grantland put them in the same category as the Bengals.
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Sep 11, 2011 6:01pm
Cam Newton is really playing well. 10 of 14, 239 yards, 2 TD and 0 INT. Leaning pretty heavily on Steve Smith, but I would too.
Laley23
Posts: 29,506
Sep 11, 2011 6:05pm
Newtons line is looking good. That or Arizonas is bad...they cant get any pressure!
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Sep 11, 2011 6:08pm
He has actually thrown two picks as well, one was negated because of a personal foul though.Laley23;892328 wrote:Newtons line is looking good. That or Arizonas is bad...they cant get any pressure!
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 6:12pm
Newton is lookin real impressive. Wonder what all the people in the CFB forum who were sayin hes not as good as Pryor think thus far lol
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Sep 11, 2011 6:16pm
What does Pryor have to do with how he's played today?Hb31187;892339 wrote:Newton is lookin real impressive. Wonder what all the people in the CFB forum who were sayin hes not as good as Pryor think thus far lol
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 6:18pm
The people saying that Cam could never run a pro style offense were 99% pro pryorrobj55;892344 wrote:What does Pryor have to do with how he's played today?
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Sep 11, 2011 6:19pm
But what does Terrelle Pryor have to do with how Cam is performing today?Hb31187;892346 wrote:The people saying that Cam could never run a pro style offense were 99% pro pryor
Mulva
Posts: 13,650
Sep 11, 2011 6:20pm
He's already completed about 6 or 7 passes for over 20 yards. 288 yards now with still 6 minutes left in the 3rd.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Sep 11, 2011 6:21pm
Pretty surprising considering he completed about 40% of his passes in preseason, good to see improvement.Mulva;892351 wrote:He's already completed about 6 or 7 passes for over 20 yards. 288 yards now with still 6 minutes left in the 3rd.
Hb31187
Posts: 8,534
Sep 11, 2011 6:22pm
Okay.... The talk of Cam Newton and his Pro success/failure mainly took place in a TP thread correct?. The people who thought he would do terrible, were almost all Pryor backers. So I wondered how the people in that thread, would think about how hes doing.
robj55
Posts: 9,511
Sep 11, 2011 6:25pm
I'll answer it for you, you are an OSU/Pryor hater and will look for anyway to discredit them and take shots at them. Pryor has nothing to do with how Cam is playing today, you just felt like bringing those discussions up to take shots at OSU and their fans and try and get under their skin. We get it, you love Michigan and hate OSUHb31187;892353 wrote:Okay.... The talk of Cam Newton and his Pro success/failure mainly took place in a TP thread correct?. The people who thought he would do terrible, were almost all Pryor backers. So I wondered how the people in that thread, would think about how hes doing.
. Stop trollin son!